• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生医疗人工智能准备度量表波斯文版的心理计量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.

机构信息

Student Committee of Medical Education Development, Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Community Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Medical Education Leadership and Management Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04516-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04516-6
PMID:37488522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10367280/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence's advancement in medicine and its worldwide implementation will be one of the main elements of medical education in the coming years. This study aimed to translate and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated according to a backward-forward translation procedure. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted on 302 medical students. Content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index and Content Validity Ratio.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole scale was found to be 0.94. The Content Validity Index was 0.92 and the Content Validity Ratio was 0.75. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a fair fit for four factors: cognition, ability, vision, and ethics.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of the medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students consisting of four factors including cognition, ability, vision, and ethics appears to be an almost valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of medical artificial intelligence readiness.

摘要

背景

人工智能在医学领域的发展及其在全球范围内的应用将成为未来几年医学教育的主要内容之一。本研究旨在翻译并对医学生医学人工智能准备量表的波斯版本进行心理计量学评估。

方法

根据反向翻译程序对问卷进行翻译。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估信度。对 302 名医学生进行验证性因子分析。使用内容效度指数和内容效度比评估内容效度。

结果

整个量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.94。内容效度指数为 0.92,内容效度比为 0.75。验证性因子分析显示,四个因素(认知、能力、愿景和伦理)具有较好的拟合度。

结论

由认知、能力、愿景和伦理四个因素组成的医学生医学人工智能准备量表的波斯文版本,似乎是评估医学人工智能准备情况的一个近乎有效和可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.医学生医疗人工智能准备度量表波斯文版的心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04516-6.
2
Psychometric properties of the persian version of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS).医学生医疗人工智能准备量表(MAIRS-MS)波斯语版的心理测量学特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 15;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04553-1.
3
Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) - development, validity and reliability study.医学生医学人工智能准备度量表(MAIRS-MS)——开发、效度与信度研究
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6.
4
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument.患者准备使用健康信息技术(PRE-HIT)工具的波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3.
5
Psychometric evaluation of Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.基于认知学徒模型的马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷的心理测量学评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Personal Meaning Profile in Iran.《个人意义特征量表波斯文版在伊朗的心理测量学特性》
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3443-3457. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01468-3. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
7
A psychometric evaluation of inter-professional education competency tool in nursing and medicine students.护理和医学专业学生跨专业教育能力工具的心理测量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04991-x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS, version 1) in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿生活影响量表(LLIS,版本 1)波斯语版的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 28;16(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0958-z.
9
The Turkish version of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale: A validity and reliability study.《凯西-芬克实践准备量表》土耳其语版的效度和信度研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103667. Epub 2023 May 18.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).老年人体力活动量表(PASE)波斯文版的心理测量特性。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02337-0.

引用本文的文献

1
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Innovations, Diagnosis, and Implications.医学问卷中的人工智能:创新、诊断及影响
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e72398. doi: 10.2196/72398.
2
Insights Into the Future: Assessing Medical Students' Artificial Intelligence Readiness - A Cross-Sectional Study at Kerman University of Medical Sciences (2022).对未来的洞察:评估医学生对人工智能的准备情况——克尔曼医科大学的一项横断面研究(2022年)
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70870. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70870. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Readiness towards artificial intelligence among medical and dental undergraduate students in Peshawar, Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey.巴基斯坦白沙瓦医学和牙科本科学生对人工智能的接受程度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06911-7.
4
Factors affecting medical artificial intelligence (AI) readiness among medical students: taking stock and looking forward.影响医学生对医学人工智能(AI)接受度的因素:总结与展望
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06852-1.
5
Evaluating cognitive performance: Traditional methods vs. ChatGPT.评估认知表现:传统方法与ChatGPT对比
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 16;10:20552076241264639. doi: 10.1177/20552076241264639. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of alternative topics to diversify medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy student theses: a mixed method study.多元化医学、牙科和药学专业学生论文选题的方法识别:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04031-8.
2
Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study.黎巴嫩医学生对人工智能的认知与态度:一项全国性调查研究。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Nov 2;5:1015418. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1015418. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of a flipped classroom course to foster medical students' AI literacy with a focus on medical imaging: a single group pre-and post-test study.以医学影像学为重点的翻转课堂课程对培养医学生人工智能素养的效果:一项单组前后测试研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 18;22(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03866-x.
4
Perceptions of US Medical Students on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey Study.美国医学生对医学人工智能的认知:混合方法调查研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Oct 21;8(4):e38325. doi: 10.2196/38325.
5
Undergraduate Medical Students' and Interns' Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.本科医学生和实习生对医学人工智能的知识与认知
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Aug 23;13:927-937. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S368519. eCollection 2022.
6
Readiness to Embrace Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Doctors and Students: Questionnaire-Based Study.医生和医学生对人工智能的接受度:基于问卷调查的研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Apr 12;8(2):e34973. doi: 10.2196/34973.
7
Artificial Intelligence Education for the Health Workforce: Expert Survey of Approaches and Needs.面向卫生工作者的人工智能教育:方法与需求的专家调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Apr 4;8(2):e35223. doi: 10.2196/35223.
8
Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) - development, validity and reliability study.医学生医学人工智能准备度量表(MAIRS-MS)——开发、效度与信度研究
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in a Resource-constrained Setting: A Reality Check.资源受限环境下胃肠道内镜检查中的人工智能:现实审视
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Dec;10(2):92-97. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1322.
10
AI-RADS: An Artificial Intelligence Curriculum for Residents.AI-RADS:面向住院医师的人工智能课程。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Dec;28(12):1810-1816. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 16.