Suppr超能文献

医学生医疗人工智能准备度量表波斯文版的心理计量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.

机构信息

Student Committee of Medical Education Development, Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Community Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Medical Education Leadership and Management Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04516-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence's advancement in medicine and its worldwide implementation will be one of the main elements of medical education in the coming years. This study aimed to translate and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated according to a backward-forward translation procedure. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted on 302 medical students. Content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index and Content Validity Ratio.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole scale was found to be 0.94. The Content Validity Index was 0.92 and the Content Validity Ratio was 0.75. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a fair fit for four factors: cognition, ability, vision, and ethics.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of the medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students consisting of four factors including cognition, ability, vision, and ethics appears to be an almost valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of medical artificial intelligence readiness.

摘要

背景

人工智能在医学领域的发展及其在全球范围内的应用将成为未来几年医学教育的主要内容之一。本研究旨在翻译并对医学生医学人工智能准备量表的波斯版本进行心理计量学评估。

方法

根据反向翻译程序对问卷进行翻译。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估信度。对 302 名医学生进行验证性因子分析。使用内容效度指数和内容效度比评估内容效度。

结果

整个量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.94。内容效度指数为 0.92,内容效度比为 0.75。验证性因子分析显示,四个因素(认知、能力、愿景和伦理)具有较好的拟合度。

结论

由认知、能力、愿景和伦理四个因素组成的医学生医学人工智能准备量表的波斯文版本,似乎是评估医学人工智能准备情况的一个近乎有效和可靠的工具。

相似文献

5
Psychometric evaluation of Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Personal Meaning Profile in Iran.
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3443-3457. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01468-3. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
The Turkish version of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale: A validity and reliability study.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103667. Epub 2023 May 18.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02337-0.

引用本文的文献

1
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Innovations, Diagnosis, and Implications.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e72398. doi: 10.2196/72398.
5
Evaluating cognitive performance: Traditional methods vs. ChatGPT.
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 16;10:20552076241264639. doi: 10.1177/20552076241264639. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study.
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Nov 2;5:1015418. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1015418. eCollection 2022.
5
Undergraduate Medical Students' and Interns' Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Aug 23;13:927-937. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S368519. eCollection 2022.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in a Resource-constrained Setting: A Reality Check.
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Dec;10(2):92-97. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1322.
10
AI-RADS: An Artificial Intelligence Curriculum for Residents.
Acad Radiol. 2021 Dec;28(12):1810-1816. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验