Özen Özhan, Buetler Karin A, Marchal-Crespo Laura
Motor Learning and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Feb 2;14:600059. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.600059. eCollection 2020.
Despite recent advances in robot-assisted training, the benefits of haptic guidance on motor (re)learning are still limited. While haptic guidance may increase task performance during training, it may also decrease participants' effort and interfere with the perception of the environment dynamics, hindering somatosensory information crucial for motor learning. Importantly, haptic guidance limits motor variability, a factor considered essential for learning. We propose that Model Predictive Controllers (MPC) might be good alternatives to haptic guidance since they minimize the assisting forces and promote motor variability during training. We conducted a study with 40 healthy participants to investigate the effectiveness of MPCs on learning a dynamic task. The task consisted of swinging a virtual pendulum to hit incoming targets with the pendulum ball. The environment was haptically rendered using a Delta robot. We designed two MPCs: the first MPC-end-effector MPC-applied the optimal assisting forces on the end-effector. A second MPC-ball MPC-applied its forces on the virtual pendulum ball to further reduce the assisting forces. The participants' performance during training and learning at short- and long-term retention tests were compared to a control group who trained without assistance, and a group that trained with conventional haptic guidance. We hypothesized that the end-effector MPC would promote motor variability and minimize the assisting forces during training, and thus, promote learning. Moreover, we hypothesized that the ball MPC would enhance the performance and motivation during training but limit the motor variability and sense of agency (i.e., the feeling of having control over their movements), and therefore, limit learning. We found that the MPCs reduce the assisting forces compared to haptic guidance. Training with the end-effector MPC increases the movement variability and does not hinder the pendulum swing variability during training, ultimately enhancing the learning of the task dynamics compared to the other groups. Finally, we observed that increases in the sense of agency seemed to be associated with learning when training with the end-effector MPC. In conclusion, training with MPCs enhances motor learning of tasks with complex dynamics and are promising strategies to improve robotic training outcomes in neurological patients.
尽管机器人辅助训练最近取得了进展,但触觉引导对运动(再)学习的益处仍然有限。虽然触觉引导可能会在训练期间提高任务表现,但它也可能会减少参与者的努力,并干扰对环境动态的感知,从而阻碍对运动学习至关重要的体感信息。重要的是,触觉引导会限制运动变异性,而运动变异性是被认为对学习至关重要的一个因素。我们提出模型预测控制器(MPC)可能是触觉引导的良好替代方案,因为它们在训练期间将辅助力降至最低,并促进运动变异性。我们对40名健康参与者进行了一项研究,以调查MPC对学习动态任务的有效性。该任务包括摆动一个虚拟摆锤,用摆锤球击中 incoming 目标。使用Delta机器人对环境进行触觉渲染。我们设计了两种MPC:第一种MPC-末端执行器MPC-在末端执行器上施加最佳辅助力。第二种MPC-球MPC-在虚拟摆锤球上施加力,以进一步降低辅助力。将参与者在训练期间以及短期和长期保留测试中的学习表现与无辅助训练的对照组以及接受传统触觉引导训练的组进行比较。我们假设末端执行器MPC会在训练期间促进运动变异性并将辅助力降至最低,从而促进学习。此外,我们假设球MPC会在训练期间提高表现和积极性,但会限制运动变异性和自主感(即对自己动作的控制感),因此会限制学习。我们发现,与触觉引导相比,MPC降低了辅助力。使用末端执行器MPC进行训练会增加运动变异性,并且在训练期间不会阻碍摆锤摆动变异性,最终与其他组相比增强了对任务动态的学习。最后,我们观察到,在使用末端执行器MPC进行训练时,自主感的增加似乎与学习相关。总之,使用MPC进行训练可增强对具有复杂动态任务的运动学习,并且是改善神经疾病患者机器人训练结果的有前景的策略。