Durso A M, Bolon I, Kleinhesselink A R, Mondardini M R, Fernandez-Marquez J L, Gutsche-Jones F, Gwilliams C, Tanner M, Smith C E, Wüster W, Grey F, Ruiz de Castañeda R
Institute of Global Health, Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, USA.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):201273. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201273. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Species identification can be challenging for biologists, healthcare practitioners and members of the general public. Snakes are no exception, and the potential medical consequences of venomous snake misidentification can be significant. Here, we collected data on identification of 100 snake species by building a week-long online citizen science challenge which attracted more than 1000 participants from around the world. We show that a large community including both professional herpetologists and skilled avocational snake enthusiasts with the potential to quickly (less than 2 min) and accurately (69-90%; see text) identify snakes is active online around the clock, but that only a small fraction of community members are proficient at identifying snakes to the species level, even when provided with the snake's geographical origin. Nevertheless, participants showed great enthusiasm and engagement, and our study provides evidence that innovative citizen science/crowdsourcing approaches can play significant roles in training and building capacity. Although identification by an expert familiar with the local snake fauna will always be the gold standard, we suggest that healthcare workers, clinicians, epidemiologists and other parties interested in snakebite could become more connected to these communities, and that professional herpetologists and skilled avocational snake enthusiasts could organize ways to help connect medical professionals to crowdsourcing platforms. Involving skilled avocational snake enthusiasts in decision making could build the capacity of healthcare workers to identify snakes more quickly, specifically and accurately, and ultimately improve snakebite treatment data and outcomes.
物种鉴定对生物学家、医疗从业者和普通公众来说都可能具有挑战性。蛇类也不例外,误认毒蛇可能会带来严重的医疗后果。在这里,我们通过开展为期一周的在线公民科学挑战收集了有关100种蛇类鉴定的数据,该挑战吸引了来自世界各地的1000多名参与者。我们发现,一个由专业爬虫学家和经验丰富的业余蛇类爱好者组成的大型群体全天候活跃在网上,他们有能力快速(不到2分钟)且准确地(69%-90%;见正文)识别蛇类,但即使提供了蛇的地理来源,也只有一小部分群体成员能够熟练地将蛇类鉴定到物种水平。尽管如此,参与者表现出了极大的热情和参与度,我们的研究证明,创新的公民科学/众包方法可以在培训和能力建设中发挥重要作用。虽然由熟悉当地蛇类群落的专家进行鉴定始终是金标准,但我们建议医护人员、临床医生、流行病学家和其他对蛇咬伤感兴趣的各方可以与这些群体建立更紧密的联系,专业爬虫学家和经验丰富的业余蛇类爱好者可以组织各种方式,帮助医疗专业人员与众包平台建立联系。让经验丰富的业余蛇类爱好者参与决策,可以增强医护人员更快、更具体、更准确地识别蛇类的能力,并最终改善蛇咬伤治疗数据和治疗效果。