Erasmus University Medical Center (MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Blood Adv. 2021 Feb 23;5(4):1110-1121. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003855.
Lenalidomide, an antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drug, has therapeutic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but definitive studies about its therapeutic utility have been lacking. In a phase 3 study, we compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients age 18 to 65 years with AML: idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle 1) and daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (cycle 2) without or with lenalidomide (15 mg orally on days 1-21). One final consolidation cycle of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) or allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) was provided according to a prognostic risk and minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted approach. Event-free survival (EFS; primary end point) and other clinical end points were assessed. A second random assignment in patients in complete response or in complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 3 or auto-SCT involved 6 cycles of maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) or observation. In all, 392 patients were randomly assigned to the control group, and 388 patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide induction. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the study revealed no differences in outcome between the treatments (EFS, 44% ± 2% standard error and overall survival, 54% ± 2% at 4 years for both arms) although in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a lenalidomide benefit was suggested in SRSF2-mutant AML. In relation to the previous Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (HOVON-SAKK) studies that used a similar 3-cycle regimen but did not pursue an MRD-guided approach, these survival estimates compare markedly more favorably. MRD status after cycle 2 lost prognostic value in intermediate-risk AML in the risk-adjusted treatment context. Maintenance with lenalidomide showed no apparent effect on relapse probability in 88 patients randomly assigned for this part of the study.
来那度胺是一种抗肿瘤和免疫调节药物,在急性髓系白血病(AML)中有治疗活性,但缺乏关于其治疗效用的明确研究。在一项 3 期研究中,我们比较了两种诱导方案在新诊断的年龄在 18 至 65 岁的 AML 患者中的疗效:阿糖胞苷(第 1 周期)和柔红霉素和中剂量阿糖胞苷(第 2 周期),无或有来那度胺(第 1 至 21 天口服 15mg)。根据预后风险和微小残留病(MRD)适应性方法,提供了一个最终的巩固化疗或自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)或异基因 SCT(allo-SCT)周期。无事件生存(EFS;主要终点)和其他临床终点进行了评估。在完全缓解或第 3 周期或 auto-SCT 后不完全血液学恢复的完全缓解患者中进行了第二次随机分组,包括 6 个周期的来那度胺维持治疗(第 1 至 21 天口服 10mg)或观察。共有 392 名患者被随机分配到对照组,388 名患者被随机分配到来那度胺诱导组。中位随访 41 个月后,研究结果显示两种治疗方法之间的结果无差异(EFS,44%±2%标准误差和总生存,4 年时均为 54%±2%),尽管在探索性事后分析中,来那度胺在 SRSF2 突变型 AML 中显示出获益。与之前使用类似的 3 周期方案但未采用 MRD 指导方法的荷兰-比利时血液肿瘤合作组和瑞士临床癌症研究组(HOVON-SAKK)研究相比,这些生存估计明显更为有利。在风险调整治疗背景下,第 2 周期后的 MRD 状态在中危 AML 中失去了预后价值。在随机分配进行这部分研究的 88 名患者中,来那度胺维持治疗对复发概率没有明显影响。