Habli Zeina, Saleh Sahera, Zaraket Hassan, Khraiche Massoud L
Neural Engineering and Nanobiosensors Group, Biomedical Engineering Program, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty for Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 28;8:605702. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.605702. eCollection 2020.
The world continues to grapple with the devastating effects of the current COVID-19 pandemic. The highly contagious nature of this respiratory disease challenges advanced viral diagnostic technologies for rapid, scalable, affordable, and high accuracy testing. Molecular assays have been the gold standard for direct detection of the presence of the viral RNA in suspected individuals, while immunoassays have been used in the surveillance of individuals by detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Unlike molecular testing, immunoassays are indirect testing of the viral infection. More than 140 diagnostic assays have been developed as of this date and have received the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA). Given the differences in assasy format and/or design as well as the lack of rigorous verification studies, the performance and accuracy of these testing modalities remain unclear. In this review, we aim to carefully examine commercialized and FDA approved molecular-based and serology-based diagnostic assays, analyze their performance characteristics and shed the light on their utility and limitations in dealing with the COVID-19 global public health crisis.
世界仍在努力应对当前新冠疫情的毁灭性影响。这种呼吸道疾病的高传染性对先进的病毒诊断技术提出了挑战,要求其能够进行快速、可扩展、经济且高精度的检测。分子检测一直是直接检测疑似个体中病毒RNA存在情况的金标准,而免疫检测则通过检测针对新冠病毒的抗体来对个体进行监测。与分子检测不同,免疫检测是对病毒感染的间接检测。截至目前,已开发出140多种诊断检测方法,并获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的紧急使用授权(EUA)。鉴于检测方法的形式和/或设计存在差异,以及缺乏严格的验证研究,这些检测方式的性能和准确性仍不明确。在本综述中,我们旨在仔细研究已商业化且获得FDA批准的基于分子和血清学的诊断检测方法,分析它们的性能特征,并阐明它们在应对新冠全球公共卫生危机中的效用和局限性。