• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间北京共享单车使用的时空流动性分析

Analysis of spatiotemporal mobility of shared-bike usage during COVID-19 pandemic in Beijing.

作者信息

Chai Xinwei, Guo Xian, Xiao Jihua, Jiang Jie

机构信息

School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture Beijing China.

BeiDou Navigation & LBS (Beijing) Co., Ltd Beijing China.

出版信息

Trans GIS. 2021 Dec;25(6):2866-2887. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12784. Epub 2021 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/tgis.12784
PMID:34899032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8646262/
Abstract

The entire world is experiencing a crisis in public health and the economy owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Understanding human mobility during the pandemic helps to formulate interventional strategies and resilient measures. The widely used bike-sharing system (BSS) could illustrate the activities of urban dwellers over time and space in big cities; however, it is rarely reported in epidemiological research. In this article, we analyze the BSS data to examine the human mobility of shared-bike users, detecting the key time nodes of different pandemic stages and demonstrating the evolution of human mobility owing to the onset of the COVID-19 threat and administrative restrictions. We assessed the impact of the pandemic using the results of co-location analysis between shared-bike usage and points of interest. Our results demonstrate that the pandemic has reduced overall bike usage by 64.8%; however, a subsequent average increase (15.9%) in shared-bike usage has been observed, suggesting partial recovery of productive and residential activities, although far from normal times. These findings could be a reference for epidemiological research, and thereby aid policymaking in the context of the current COVID-19 outbreak and other epidemic events at the city scale.

摘要

由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,整个世界正在经历一场公共卫生和经济危机。了解大流行期间的人员流动情况有助于制定干预策略和弹性措施。广泛使用的共享单车系统(BSS)可以说明大城市中城市居民在时间和空间上的活动情况;然而,在流行病学研究中很少有相关报道。在本文中,我们分析了共享单车系统数据,以研究共享单车用户的人员流动情况,找出不同疫情阶段的关键时间节点,并展示由于COVID-19威胁的出现和行政限制导致的人员流动演变。我们使用共享单车使用情况与兴趣点之间的共置分析结果评估了大流行的影响。我们的结果表明,大流行使共享单车的总体使用量减少了64.8%;然而,随后观察到共享单车使用量平均增加了15.9%,这表明生产和居住活动出现了部分恢复,尽管远未恢复到正常时期。这些发现可为流行病学研究提供参考,从而有助于在当前COVID-19疫情及城市层面的其他疫情事件背景下制定政策。

相似文献

1
Analysis of spatiotemporal mobility of shared-bike usage during COVID-19 pandemic in Beijing.新冠疫情期间北京共享单车使用的时空流动性分析
Trans GIS. 2021 Dec;25(6):2866-2887. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12784. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
2
Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间一个中型共享单车系统的使用演变模式。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104669. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
A long-term perspective on the COVID-19: The bike sharing system resilience under the epidemic environment.对新冠疫情的长期展望:疫情环境下共享单车系统的恢复力
J Transp Health. 2022 Sep;26:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101460. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
4
Examining spatiotemporal changing patterns of bike-sharing usage during COVID-19 pandemic.审视新冠疫情期间共享单车使用的时空变化模式。
J Transp Geogr. 2021 Feb;91:102997. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102997. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
The role of bike sharing during the coronavirus pandemic: An analysis of the mobility patterns and perceptions of Lisbon's users.新冠疫情期间共享单车的作用:对里斯本用户出行模式及看法的分析
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users' motivations during COVID-19.共享单车作为突发公共卫生危机期间替代出行方式的优缺点:对新冠疫情期间用户动机的定性分析
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022 Dec;129:24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
8
The motivations for using bike sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Lisbon.新冠疫情期间使用共享单车的动机:来自里斯本的见解。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2021 Oct;82:378-399. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
9
Impacts of COVID-19 on Bike-Share Usage: The case of Daejeon, Korea.新冠疫情对共享单车使用情况的影响:以韩国大田市为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jun 9:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100856.
10
Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.根据通行证类型对因新冠疫情导致的首尔共享单车使用模式变化的调查。
Heliyon. 2023 May;9(5):e16077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16077. Epub 2023 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间一个中型共享单车系统的使用演变模式。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104669. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Who changed and who maintained their urban bike-sharing mobility after the COVID-19 outbreak? A within-subjects study.在新冠疫情爆发后,哪些人改变了,哪些人保持了他们的城市共享单车出行方式?一项受试者内研究。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104343. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Revealing the spatiotemporal characteristics of the general public's panic levels during the pandemic crisis in China.揭示中国疫情危机期间公众恐慌水平的时空特征。
Trans GIS. 2022 Dec 26. doi: 10.1111/tgis.13016.
4
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the profile and preferences of urban mobility in Brazil: Challenges and opportunities.新冠疫情对巴西城市交通模式与偏好的影响:挑战与机遇
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:312-322. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
Causal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily ridership of public bicycle sharing in Seoul.新冠疫情对首尔公共自行车共享系统日使用量的因果影响。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Feb;89:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104344. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
6
The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users' motivations during COVID-19.共享单车作为突发公共卫生危机期间替代出行方式的优缺点:对新冠疫情期间用户动机的定性分析
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022 Dec;129:24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Riding the wave: Predicting the use of the bike-sharing system in Barcelona before and during COVID-19.顺应潮流:预测新冠疫情前后巴塞罗那共享单车系统的使用情况。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2022 Aug;83:103929. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103929. Epub 2022 May 4.
8
Bike-Sharing Demand Prediction at Community Level under COVID-19 Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的 COVID-19 下社区层面共享单车需求预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;22(3):1060. doi: 10.3390/s22031060.
9
Bikeshare and subway ridership changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.纽约市在新冠疫情期间共享单车和地铁客流量的变化。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Jun;106:262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China.中国的人员流动限制与新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)的传播
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104272. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Variation in human mobility and its impact on the risk of future COVID-19 outbreaks in Taiwan.人类流动性的变化及其对台湾未来 COVID-19 爆发风险的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10260-7.
3
The Impact of Policy Measures on Human Mobility, COVID-19 Cases, and Mortality in the US: A Spatiotemporal Perspective.政策措施对美国人口流动、新冠病例和死亡率的影响:时空透视。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 23;18(3):996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030996.
4
Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic.非强制性措施在 COVID-19 疫情期间极大地降低了东京的人员流动性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75033-5.
5
Mobile device data reveal the dynamics in a positive relationship between human mobility and COVID-19 infections.移动设备数据揭示了人类流动性和 COVID-19 感染之间呈正相关关系的动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27087-27089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010836117. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Effects of human mobility restrictions on the spread of COVID-19 in Shenzhen, China: a modelling study using mobile phone data.利用手机数据的建模研究:中国深圳的人类流动限制对 COVID-19 传播的影响
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e417-e424. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30165-5. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States.基于 GIS 的美国大陆 COVID-19 发病率空间建模。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138884. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Chinese Public's Attention to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Social Media: Observational Descriptive Study.中国公众在社交媒体上对新冠疫情的关注度:观察性描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 4;22(5):e18825. doi: 10.2196/18825.
9
COVID-19 information propagation dynamics in the Chinese Sina-microblog.中国新浪微博上新冠疫情信息的传播动态
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Mar 9;17(3):2676-2692. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020146.
10
Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: how 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics.全球冠状病毒病 COVID-19/严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)疫情及相关事件的地理追踪和制图:21 世纪 GIS 技术如何支持全球抗击疫情和传染病。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Mar 11;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00202-8.