• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立和运营数据信托的基本要求:由十五个加拿大组织和倡议的代表共同制定的实用指南

Essential requirements for establishing and operating data trusts: practical guidance co-developed by representatives from fifteen canadian organizations and initiatives.

作者信息

Paprica P Alison, Sutherland Eric, Smith Andrea, Brudno Michael, Cartagena Rosario G, Crichlow Monique, Courtney Brian K, Loken Chris, McGrail Kimberlyn M, Ryan Alex, Schull Michael J, Thorogood Adrian, Virtanen Carl, Yang Kathleen

机构信息

University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.

Vector Institute, Suite 710, 661 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Aug 24;5(1):1353. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1353.

DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1353
PMID:33644412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894384/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increasingly, the label "data trust" is being applied to repeatable mechanisms or approaches to sharing data in a timely, fair, safe, and equitable way. However, there is an absence of practical guidance regarding how to establish and operate a data trust.

AIM AND APPROACH

In December 2019, the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence convened a working meeting of 19 people representing 15 Canadian organizations/initiatives involved in data sharing, most of which focus on public sector health data. The objective was to identify essential requirements for the establishment and operation of data trusts in the Canadian context. Preliminary requirements were discussed during the meeting and then refined as authors contributed to this manuscript.

RESULTS

Twelve minimum specification requirements ("min specs") for data trusts were identified. The foundational min spec is that data trusts must meet all legal requirements, including legal authority to collect, hold or share data. In addition, there was agreement that data trusts must have (i) an accountable governing body to ensure that the data trust achieves its stated purpose and is transparent, (ii) comprehensive data management including clear processes and qualified individuals responsible for the collection, storage, access, disclosure and use of data, (iii) training and accountability requirements for all data users and (iv) ongoing public and stakeholder engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Practical guidance for the establishment and operation of data trusts was articulated in the form of 12 min specs requirements. The 12 min specs are a starting point. Future work to refine and strengthen them with members of the public, companies, and additional research data stakeholders from within and outside of Canada, is recommended.

摘要

引言

“数据信托”这一标签越来越多地被用于指代以及时、公平、安全和公平的方式共享数据的可重复机制或方法。然而,关于如何建立和运营数据信托,目前缺乏实际指导。

目的与方法

2019年12月,加拿大卫生信息研究所和向量人工智能研究所召集了一次工作会议,与会的19人代表了15个参与数据共享的加拿大组织/倡议,其中大多数专注于公共部门的健康数据。目的是确定在加拿大背景下建立和运营数据信托的基本要求。会议期间讨论了初步要求,随后随着作者对本手稿的贡献而进行了完善。

结果

确定了数据信托的12项最低规范要求(“最低规范”)。基本的最低规范是数据信托必须符合所有法律要求,包括收集、持有或共享数据的法律权限。此外,与会者一致认为,数据信托必须具备:(i)一个可问责的治理机构,以确保数据信托实现其既定目标并保持透明;(ii)全面的数据管理,包括明确的流程以及负责数据收集、存储、访问、披露和使用的数据管理人员;(iii)对所有数据用户的培训和问责要求;(iv)持续的公众和利益相关者参与。

结论

以12项最低规范要求的形式阐述了数据信托建立和运营的实际指导。这12项最低规范是一个起点。建议未来与加拿大国内外的公众、公司以及其他研究数据利益相关者共同完善和强化这些规范。

相似文献

1
Essential requirements for establishing and operating data trusts: practical guidance co-developed by representatives from fifteen canadian organizations and initiatives.建立和运营数据信托的基本要求:由十五个加拿大组织和倡议的代表共同制定的实用指南
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Aug 24;5(1):1353. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1353.
2
Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.数据信托、数据存储库和其他数据合作的治理和管理的基本要求。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Sep 20;8(4):2142. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2142. eCollection 2023.
3
Commitments for Ethically Responsible Sourcing, Use, and Reuse of Patient Data in the Digital Age: Cocreation Process.数字时代患者数据的道德负责获取、使用和再利用承诺:共创过程。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e41095. doi: 10.2196/41095.
4
Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews.为养老院常规健康数据的二次利用建立治理框架:使用定性访谈的开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 25;25:e38929. doi: 10.2196/38929.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
User Requirements for Comanaged Digital Health and Care: Review.患者对共管理型数字健康和护理的需求:综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 10;24(6):e35337. doi: 10.2196/35337.
7
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence and social accountability in the Canadian health care landscape: A rapid literature review.加拿大医疗保健领域中的人工智能与社会问责制:快速文献综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;3(9):e0000597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000597. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Public Involvement and Engagement in Big Data Research: Scoping Review.公众参与大数据研究:范围综述
J Particip Med. 2024 Aug 16;16:e56673. doi: 10.2196/56673.
3
Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.数据信托、数据存储库和其他数据合作的治理和管理的基本要求。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Sep 20;8(4):2142. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2142. eCollection 2023.
4
Ethical and social reflections on the proposed European Health Data Space.关于拟议的欧洲健康数据空间的伦理和社会思考。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):498-505. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01543-9. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Database quality assessment in research in paramedicine: a scoping review.急救医学研究中的数据库质量评估:范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 11;31(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01145-2.
6
Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.患者和公众对健康数据二次使用背景下透明度的期望:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 13;25:e45002. doi: 10.2196/45002.
7
'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.“对我来说,这只是 1 和 0,但实际上,那就是死亡”:一项定性研究,探索研究人员在大数据研究中涉及和吸引很少被听到的社区的经验。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):882-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13713. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Next-Generation Capabilities in Trusted Research Environments: Interview Study.可信研究环境中的下一代能力:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 20;24(9):e33720. doi: 10.2196/33720.
9
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.非洲综合人口健康数据库的考量:全球最佳实践的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
10
What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?健康研究的数据信托可以从生物库的参与式治理中学到什么?
J Med Ethics. 2022 May;48(5):323-328. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.共享用于研究的关联数据集:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省一次公众参与审议活动的结果
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 May 7;4(1):1103. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1103.
2
Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research.关于公众参与和参与数据密集型健康研究的共识声明。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Feb 12;4(1):586. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586.
3
Notches on the dial: a call to action to develop plain language communication with the public about users and uses of health data.表盘上的刻度:呼吁采取行动,就健康数据的用户和用途与公众开展通俗易懂的沟通。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Aug 5;4(1):1106. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1106.
4
The TRUST Principles for digital repositories.TRUST 数字知识库原则。
Sci Data. 2020 May 14;7(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7.
5
We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era.我们需要在数字时代思考痴呆症研究的数据治理问题。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Jan 31;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-0584-y.
6
Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.公众对英国、美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的基因组数据共享的信任。
Hum Genet. 2019 Dec;138(11-12):1237-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02062-0. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models.利用生成模型估计不完全数据集重识别的成功率。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3.
8
Participatory governance over research in an academic research network: the case of Diabetes Action Canada.参与式治理在学术研究网络中的研究:以加拿大糖尿病行动为例。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e026828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026828.
9
Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape.描述生物医学数据共享领域。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1073110519840481.
10
Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons.引言:在医学信息共享空间中共享数据。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):7-11. doi: 10.1177/1073110519840479.