Suppr超能文献

改良根治性乳房切除术中手术刀与电灼术的比较

Scalpel versus electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy.

作者信息

Miller E, Paull D E, Morrissey K, Cortese A, Nowak E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center, NY 10021.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1988 May;54(5):284-6.

PMID:3364865
Abstract

Forty nine consecutive mastectomy patients were randomized to one of two groups. Twenty four patients had skin flaps created with the cold scalpel and twenty five with the electrocautery. The two groups were similar with respect to age, stage of disease, size of tumor, and weight. Cautery patients had significantly less operative blood loss when compared with scalpel patients, 352 versus 507 milliliters, respectively, P less than 0.05. No cautery patient required transfusion compared with three transfused scalpel patients, P less than .005. Total postoperative hemovac drainage and hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Although the number of fever days and wound complications were slightly higher in the cautery group, the difference was not statistically significant. The electrocautery may be superior to the scalpel for mastectomy.

摘要

四十九例连续的乳房切除术患者被随机分为两组。二十四例患者使用冷手术刀制作皮瓣,二十五例使用电灼术。两组在年龄、疾病分期、肿瘤大小和体重方面相似。与手术刀组患者相比,电灼术组患者术中失血量显著减少,分别为352毫升和507毫升,P<0.05。与三名接受输血的手术刀组患者相比,电灼术组无患者需要输血,P<0.005。两组术后总负压引流和住院时间无显著差异。虽然电灼术组的发热天数和伤口并发症数量略高,但差异无统计学意义。对于乳房切除术,电灼术可能优于手术刀。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验