Suppr超能文献

基于一步法 GBLUP 模型对肉鸡组合群体遗传差异的分析。

Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Cobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2021 Apr 1;99(4). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab056.

Abstract

The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was composed of 242,413 birds and genotypes were available for 107,216 birds. A five-trait model that included one growth, two yield, and two efficiency traits was used for the analyses. The strategies to model the introduction of external birds were to include a fixed effect representing the origin of parents and to use unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF). Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with single-step GBLUP using the Algorithm for Proven and Young. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of GEBV for the validation birds, that is, from the most recent generation, were computed. The bias and dispersion were estimated with the linear regression (LR) method,whereas accuracy was estimated by the LR method and predictive ability. When fixed UPG were fit without estimated inbreeding, the model did not converge. In contrast, models with fixed UPG and estimated inbreeding or random UPG converged and resulted in similar GEBV. The inclusion of an extra fixed effect in the model made the GEBV unbiased and reduced the inflation. Genomic predictions with MF were slightly biased and inflated due to the unbalanced number of observations assigned to each metafounder. When combining local and external populations, the greatest accuracy can be obtained by adding an extra fixed effect to account for the origin of parents plus UPG with estimated inbreeding or random UPG. To estimate the accuracy, the LR method is more consistent among scenarios, whereas the predictive ability greatly depends on the model specification.

摘要

从不同环境或种群引入动物是商业牲畜种群中的常见做法。在这项研究中,我们模拟了将一组外部鸟类纳入当地肉鸡种群的情况,目的是进行基因组评估。系谱由 242413 只鸟组成,其中 107216 只鸟有基因型。分析中使用了一个包含一个生长、两个产率和两个效率性状的五性状模型。模拟引入外部鸟类的策略是包括一个代表父母起源的固定效应,并使用未知亲本组(UPG)或元祖先(MF)。使用 Algorithm for Proven and Young 进行单步 GBLUP 获得基因组估计育种值(GEBV)。对于验证鸟类(即最近一代),计算 GEBV 的偏差、分散度和准确性。偏差和分散度通过线性回归(LR)方法估计,而准确性通过 LR 方法和预测能力估计。当不估计近交时拟合固定 UPG 时,模型无法收敛。相比之下,具有固定 UPG 和估计近交或随机 UPG 的模型收敛,导致相似的 GEBV。在模型中增加额外的固定效应使 GEBV 无偏并减少膨胀。由于分配给每个元祖先的观测值不平衡,使用 MF 进行基因组预测会略微偏倚和膨胀。在组合本地和外部种群时,通过添加额外的固定效应来解释父母起源,再加上具有估计近交或随机 UPG 的 UPG,可以获得最大的准确性。为了估计准确性,LR 方法在不同场景下更为一致,而预测能力则很大程度上取决于模型规格。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0644/8355479/3cfd043f7ad9/skab056_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验