Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Sep;54(3):787-794. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27581. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images are often collected with different imaging parameters, which may impact the calculated values of myocardial radiomic features.
To investigate the sensitivity of myocardial radiomic features to changes in imaging parameters in cardiac MR images.
Prospective.
A total of 11 healthy participants/five patients.
FIELD STRENGTH/ SEQUENCE: A 3 T/cine balanced steady-state free-precession, T -weighted spoiled gradient-echo, T -weighted turbo spin-echo, and quantitative T and T mapping. For each sequence, the flip angle, in-plane resolution, slice thickness, and parallel imaging technique were varied to study the sensitivity of radiomic features to alterations in imaging parameters.
Myocardial contours were manually delineated by experienced readers, and a total of 1023 radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics with 11 image filters and six feature families.
Sensitivity was defined as the standardized mean difference (D effect size), and the robust features were defined at sensitivity < 0.2. Sensitivity analysis was performed on predefined sets of reproducible features. The analysis was performed using the entire cohort of 16 subejcts.
64% of radiomic features were robust (sensitivity < 0.2) to changes in any imaging parameter. In qualitative sequences, radiomic features were most sensitive to changes in in-plane spatial resolution (spatial resolution: 0.6 vs. flip angle: 0.19, parallel imaging: 0.18, slice thickness: 0.07; P < 0.01 for all); in quantitative sequences, radiomic features were least sensitive to changes in spatial resolution (spatial resolution: 0.07 vs. slice thickness: 0.16, flip angle: 0.24; P < 0.01 for all). In an individual feature level, no singular feature family/image filter was identified as robust (sensitivity < 0.2) across sequences; however, highly sensitive features were predominantly associated with high-frequency wavelet filters across all sequences (32/50 features).
In cardiac MR, a considerable number of radiomic features are sensitive to changes in sequence parameters.
1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
心脏磁共振(MR)图像通常采用不同的成像参数进行采集,这可能会影响心肌放射组学特征的计算值。
探讨心脏 MR 图像中成像参数变化对心肌放射组学特征的敏感性。
前瞻性。
共 11 名健康志愿者/5 名患者。
磁场强度/序列:3T/电影平衡稳态自由进动、T1 加权扰相梯度回波、T2 加权涡轮自旋回波和定量 T1 和 T2 映射。对于每个序列,改变翻转角、平面分辨率、层厚和并行成像技术,以研究放射组学特征对成像参数变化的敏感性。
由有经验的读者手动勾画心肌轮廓,使用 PyRadiomics 提取总共 1023 个放射组学特征,共 11 个图像滤波器和 6 个特征族。
敏感性定义为标准化平均差异(D 效应量),稳健特征定义为敏感性<0.2。在可重复特征的预定义集合上进行敏感性分析。该分析在 16 名受试者的整个队列中进行。
64%的放射组学特征对任何成像参数的变化都很敏感(敏感性<0.2)。在定性序列中,放射组学特征对平面空间分辨率的变化最敏感(空间分辨率:0.6 对翻转角:0.19,并行成像:0.18,层厚:0.07;所有 P<0.01);在定量序列中,放射组学特征对空间分辨率的变化最不敏感(空间分辨率:0.07 对层厚:0.16,翻转角:0.24;所有 P<0.01)。在单个特征水平上,没有单个特征族/图像滤波器被确定为在所有序列中稳健(敏感性<0.2);然而,在所有序列中,高敏感特征主要与高频小波滤波器相关(32/50 个特征)。
在心脏 MR 中,相当多的放射组学特征对序列参数的变化敏感。
1 技术功效:阶段 1。