Occupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.
Disaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052308.
The increasing threats from biological agents have become a concern in laboratories, and emerging infectious diseases have demanded increased awareness and preparedness of laboratory facilities. Bio-risk assessment is needed to provide a framework for organisations to establish a comprehensive bio-risk management system. The assessment criteria should include both biosafety and biosecurity measures. Laboratories in Indonesia play a significant role in public health interventions in term of disease screening, diagnosis and medical decision making. The National Clinical and Medical Referral Centre Laboratories have the potential of daily exposures to dangerous biological materials. This study aims to identify the gap between bio-risk management system implementation and International Standard Organisation (ISO) 35001:2019 requirements. The 202 items in ISO 35001:2019 are categorized into seven main elements. The findings show that more than half of the elements on ISO 35001:2019 have been implemented in these centres. Good performance was identified at lab 4 and 5 which obtained the highest scores, particularly in the context of organisation, planning, operation and improvement elements. However, the widest gap was found in leadership, support and performance evaluation. One way to address this would be to create written rules and regulations at the laboratory top management level to require all laboratory facilities to comply to the bio-risk policies, rules, and regulations.
生物制剂带来的威胁日益增加,这在实验室中引起了关注,新出现的传染病要求实验室设施提高认识和做好准备。需要进行生物风险评估,为各组织建立全面的生物风险管理系统提供框架。评估标准应包括生物安全和生物安保措施。印度尼西亚的实验室在疾病筛查、诊断和医疗决策方面对公共卫生干预发挥了重要作用。国家临床和医学转诊中心实验室每天都有可能接触到危险的生物材料。本研究旨在确定生物风险管理系统实施与国际标准化组织(ISO)35001:2019 要求之间的差距。ISO 35001:2019 中的 202 项条款分为七个主要要素。研究结果表明,这些中心已经实施了 ISO 35001:2019 中一半以上的要素。实验室 4 和 5 的表现良好,得分最高,特别是在组织、规划、运行和改进要素方面。然而,在领导力、支持和绩效评估方面存在最大差距。解决这一问题的一种方法是在实验室最高管理层制定书面规则和条例,要求所有实验室设施遵守生物风险政策、规则和条例。