• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌贼在延迟满足任务中表现出自我控制能力。

Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task.

作者信息

Schnell Alexandra K, Boeckle Markus, Rivera Micaela, Clayton Nicola S, Hanlon Roger T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Karl Landsteiner University of Health Science, Krems, Austria.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 10;288(1946):20203161. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3161. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2020.3161
PMID:33653135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935110/
Abstract

The ability to exert self-control varies within and across taxa. Some species can exert self-control for several seconds whereas others, such as large-brained vertebrates, can tolerate delays of up to several minutes. Advanced self-control has been linked to better performance in cognitive tasks and has been hypothesized to evolve in response to specific socio-ecological pressures. These pressures are difficult to uncouple because previously studied species face similar socio-ecological challenges. Here, we investigate self-control and learning performance in cuttlefish, an invertebrate that is thought to have evolved under partially different pressures to previously studied vertebrates. To test self-control, cuttlefish were presented with a delay maintenance task, which measures an individual's ability to forgo immediate gratification and sustain a delay for a better but delayed reward. Cuttlefish maintained delay durations for up to 50-130 s. To test learning performance, we used a reversal-learning task, whereby cuttlefish were required to learn to associate the reward with one of two stimuli and then subsequently learn to associate the reward with the alternative stimulus. Cuttlefish that delayed gratification for longer had better learning performance. Our results demonstrate that cuttlefish can tolerate delays to obtain food of higher quality comparable to that of some large-brained vertebrates.

摘要

自我控制能力在不同物种以及同一物种内部都有所不同。一些物种能够进行长达数秒的自我控制,而其他物种,如大脑较大的脊椎动物,则能够忍受长达数分钟的延迟。高级自我控制能力与在认知任务中表现更好有关,并且据推测是为了应对特定的社会生态压力而进化的。由于之前研究的物种面临相似的社会生态挑战,这些压力很难区分开来。在这里,我们研究了乌贼的自我控制和学习表现,乌贼是一种无脊椎动物,其进化过程中所面临的压力被认为与之前研究的脊椎动物部分不同。为了测试自我控制能力,我们给乌贼设置了一个延迟维持任务,该任务旨在衡量个体放弃即时满足、为了更好但延迟的奖励而维持延迟的能力。乌贼能够维持长达50 - 130秒的延迟时间。为了测试学习表现,我们使用了一个逆向学习任务,即要求乌贼学会将奖励与两种刺激中的一种联系起来,然后再学会将奖励与另一种刺激联系起来。延迟满足时间更长的乌贼学习表现更好。我们的研究结果表明,乌贼能够忍受延迟以获取与一些大脑较大的脊椎动物相当的更高质量食物。

相似文献

1
Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task.乌贼在延迟满足任务中表现出自我控制能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 10;288(1946):20203161. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3161. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Waiting for a better possibility: delay of gratification in corvids and its relationship to other cognitive capacities.等待更好的可能性:鸦科动物的延迟满足及其与其他认知能力的关系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210348. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0348. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
Intra- and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task.在延迟满足任务中鹦鹉的自我控制能力的种内和种间变化。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):473-491. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01565-6. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
4
Waiting for the better reward: Comparison of delay of gratification in young children across two cultures.等待更好的回报:两种文化背景下幼儿延迟满足的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 3;16(9):e0256966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256966. eCollection 2021.
5
The effect of unexpected rewards on decision making in cuttlefish.章鱼的意外奖励对其决策的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 15;12(1):2514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06443-w.
6
Horses wait for more and better rewards in a delay of gratification paradigm.在延迟满足范式中,马会等待更多更好的奖励。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:954472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954472. eCollection 2022.
7
Self-control assessments of capuchin monkeys with the rotating tray task and the accumulation task.使用旋转托盘任务和积累任务对卷尾猴进行自我控制评估。
Behav Processes. 2016 Aug;129:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
8
Temporal expectations in delay of gratification.延迟满足中的时间期望。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2023 Jan;119(1):59-80. doi: 10.1002/jeab.814. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Delayed gratification in New Caledonian crows and young children: influence of reward type and visibility.新喀鸦和幼儿的延迟满足:奖励类型和可见性的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Jan;23(1):71-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01317-7. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
10
How do African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) perform on a delay of gratification task?非洲灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)在延迟满足任务中表现如何?
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0284-2. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions.从执行功能的角度解读昆虫行为。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 4;19:1638374. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1638374. eCollection 2025.
2
decision-making revealed via a quantitative and ethological study of foraging.通过对觅食的定量和行为学研究揭示的决策过程。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 16:2024.09.18.613674. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.18.613674.
3
Assessing the limits of delay of gratification in bumble bees.评估大黄蜂延迟满足的限度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08616-9.
4
Lizards and tortoises show evidence of low inhibitory control.蜥蜴和乌龟表现出抑制控制能力较低的迹象。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08373-9.
5
Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds.自我控制在灵长类动物中具有社会作用,但在其他哺乳动物或鸟类中则不然。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99523-6.
6
The Case for Octopus Consciousness: Valence.章鱼意识之实例:效价
NeuroSci. 2022 Nov 17;3(4):656-666. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3040047. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
The Case for Octopus Consciousness: Temporality.章鱼具有意识的例证:时间性。
NeuroSci. 2022 May 3;3(2):245-261. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3020018. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Measuring self-control in a wild songbird using a spatial discounting task.利用空间折扣任务测量野生鸣禽的自我控制能力。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Oct 25;27(1):70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01911-4.
9
To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals.知道还是不知道?好奇心与动物前瞻性信息的价值。
Learn Behav. 2025 Mar;53(1):114-127. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00647-y. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Invisible Invertebrates: The Welfare of Invertebrates in Public Aquaria.隐形无脊椎动物:公共水族馆中无脊椎动物的福利
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 23;13(23):3620. doi: 10.3390/ani13233620.

本文引用的文献

1
Learned valuation during forage decision-making in cuttlefish.乌贼在觅食决策过程中的学习性估值
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Dec 16;7(12):201602. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201602. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
How intelligent is a cephalopod? Lessons from comparative cognition.头足类动物有多聪明?来自比较认知学的经验教训。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Feb;96(1):162-178. doi: 10.1111/brv.12651. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
Cuttlefish retrieve whether they smelt or saw a previously encountered item.乌贼会根据之前是否闻到或看到过某件物品来进行检索。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 25;10(1):5413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62335-x.
4
Cuttlefish show flexible and future-dependent foraging cognition.乌贼表现出灵活且依赖未来的觅食认知。
Biol Lett. 2020 Feb;16(2):20190743. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0743. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Cephalopod cognition.头足类动物认知。
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 5;29(15):R726-R732. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.049.
6
Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates.乌鸦、鹦鹉和非人类灵长类动物的自我控制。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;10(6):e1504. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1504. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
What can associative learning do for planning?联想学习对规划有什么作用?
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Nov 28;5(11):180778. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180778. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Grow Smart and Die Young: Why Did Cephalopods Evolve Intelligence?聪明早逝:头足类动物为何进化出智力?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;34(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Bonobos voluntarily hand food to others but not toys or tools.倭黑猩猩会主动将食物递给别人,但不会给别人玩具或工具。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 12;285(1886):20181536. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1536.
10
Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.比较心理学:确定差异是理解进化的核心。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0283.