• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

算法不公正:一种关系伦理方法。

Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach.

作者信息

Birhane Abeba

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland & Lero-The Irish Software Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Patterns (N Y). 2021 Feb 12;2(2):100205. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.

DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205
PMID:33659914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7892355/
Abstract

It has become trivial to point out that algorithmic systems increasingly pervade the social sphere. Improved efficiency-the hallmark of these systems-drives their mass integration into day-to-day life. However, as a robust body of research in the area of algorithmic injustice shows, algorithmic systems, especially when used to sort and predict social outcomes, are not only inadequate but also perpetuate harm. In particular, a persistent and recurrent trend within the literature indicates that society's most vulnerable are disproportionally impacted. When algorithmic injustice and harm are brought to the fore, most of the solutions on offer (1) revolve around technical solutions and (2) do not center disproportionally impacted communities. This paper proposes a fundamental shift-from rational to relational-in thinking about personhood, data, justice, and everything in between, and places ethics as something that goes above and beyond technical solutions. Outlining the idea of ethics built on the foundations of relationality, this paper calls for a rethinking of justice and ethics as a set of broad, contingent, and fluid concepts and down-to-earth practices that are best viewed as a habit and not a mere methodology for data science. As such, this paper mainly offers critical examinations and reflection and not "solutions."

摘要

指出算法系统日益渗透到社会领域已变得轻而易举。这些系统的标志性特征——提高效率,推动了它们大规模融入日常生活。然而,正如算法不公正领域大量有力的研究所表明的那样,算法系统,尤其是在用于对社会结果进行分类和预测时,不仅不够完善,而且还会使伤害持续存在。特别是,文献中一个持续且反复出现的趋势表明,社会中最弱势群体受到的影响尤为严重。当算法不公正和伤害被凸显出来时,现有的大多数解决方案(1)围绕技术解决方案展开,(2)没有以受影响尤为严重的社区为核心。本文提出了一种根本性的转变——从理性思维转向关系思维——来思考人格、数据、正义以及其间的一切,并将伦理置于超越技术解决方案的位置。本文概述了基于关系性基础构建的伦理观念,呼吁将正义和伦理重新思考为一组宽泛、偶然且灵活的概念以及切实可行的实践,这些最好被视为一种习惯,而不仅仅是数据科学的一种方法。因此,本文主要提供批判性审视和反思,而非“解决方案”。

相似文献

1
Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach.算法不公正:一种关系伦理方法。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Feb 12;2(2):100205. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.
2
Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare.自动阿片类药物风险评分:医疗保健中机器学习导致认知不公正的一个案例。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2023;25(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10676-023-09676-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Research agenda for algorithmic fairness studies: Access to justice lessons for interdisciplinary research.算法公平性研究的研究议程:跨学科研究的司法获取经验教训。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Dec 21;5:882134. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.882134. eCollection 2022.
5
Creating Space for Feminist Ethics in Medical School.在医学院为女性主义伦理学创造空间。
HEC Forum. 2020 Jun;32(2):111-124. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09403-x.
6
Exploring the relevance of social justice within a relational nursing ethic.探究关系护理伦理中社会正义的相关性。
Nurs Philos. 2012 Jan;13(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00525.x.
7
Rethinking monogamy's nature: From the truth of non/monogamy to a dyke ethics of "antimonogamy".重新思考一夫一妻制的本质:从非一夫一妻制/一夫一妻制的真相到一种“反一夫一妻制”的女同性恋伦理。
J Lesbian Stud. 2018 Apr 3;22(2):235-253. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2017.1340006. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review.从关系伦理视角看以患者为中心的护理,以提供高质量和安全的医疗保健:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.
9
Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.心理健康护理中算法和数据驱动技术研究的伦理与法律:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jun 10;8(6):e24668. doi: 10.2196/24668.
10
Scientific Ethics: A New Approach.科学伦理:一种新方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1193-1216. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0050-4. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
FanFAIR: sensitive data sets semi-automatic fairness assessment.FanFAIR:敏感数据集半自动公平性评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Sep 12;25(Suppl 3):329. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03184-4.
2
Relational Ethics in the Administration of Healthcare Technology: AI, Automation and Proper Distance.医疗技术管理中的关系伦理:人工智能、自动化与适当距离
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jun;47(5):e70055. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70055.
3
AI through the looking glass: an empirical study of structural social and ethical challenges in AI.透过镜子看人工智能:对人工智能中结构性社会和伦理挑战的实证研究
AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3891-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
4
We need better images of AI and better conversations about AI.我们需要有关人工智能的更好图像以及关于人工智能的更深入探讨。
AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3615-3626. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02101-z. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Books (Are Not Like People): A Postdigital Fable.《书籍(不像人):一则后数字时代寓言》
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(2):519-539. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00256-2. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Building health systems capable of leveraging AI: applying Paul Farmer's 5S framework for equitable global health.构建能够利用人工智能的卫生系统:应用保罗·法默的公平全球卫生5S框架
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 May 2;3(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00158-6.
7
A golden age of behavioural social psychology? Towards a social psychology of power and intergroup relations in the digital age.行为社会心理学的黄金时代?迈向数字时代权力与群体间关系的社会心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12896. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12896.
8
AI, universal basic income, and power: symbolic violence in the tech elite's narrative.人工智能、普遍基本收入与权力:科技精英叙事中的象征性暴力
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Feb 24;8:1488457. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1488457. eCollection 2025.
9
How predictive medicine leads to solidarity gaps in health.预测医学如何导致健康领域的团结差距。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 18;8(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01497-2.
10
High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare.高回报、高风险技术?医疗保健领域人工智能开发的伦理与法律剖析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism NYU Press, 2018. 256 pp.《压迫的算法:搜索引擎如何强化种族主义》 纽约大学出版社,2018年。256页。
Science. 2021 Oct 29;374(6567):542. doi: 10.1126/science.abm5861. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Don't ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair, ask how it shifts power.不要问人工智能是好是坏或是否公平,要问它如何转移权力。
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7815):169. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02003-2.
3
Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration.利用科学大众协作来衡量生命结局的可预测性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 14;117(15):8398-8403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915006117. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
5
The body social: an enactive approach to the self.身体社会:一种关于自我的生成进路。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 12;5:986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00986. eCollection 2014.
6
The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?贝叶斯方法的兴起:是好是坏?
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 8;5:765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765. eCollection 2014.
7
Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition.贝叶斯原教旨主义还是启蒙?论认知贝叶斯模型的解释地位和理论贡献。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Aug;34(4):169-88; disuccsion 188-231. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10003134.
8
Bayesian Bigot? Statistical Discrimination, Stereotypes, and Employer Decision Making.贝叶斯偏执者?统计歧视、刻板印象与雇主决策
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2009 Jan 1;621(1):70-93. doi: 10.1177/0002716208324628.