Ryan Mark, de Roo Nina, Wang Hao, Blok Vincent, Atik Can
Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Philosophy Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.
AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3891-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
This paper examines how professionals (N = 32) working on artificial intelligence (AI) view structural AI ethics challenges like injustices and inequalities beyond individual agents' direct intention and control. This paper answers the research question: What are professionals' perceptions of the structural challenges of AI (in the agri-food sector)? This empirical paper shows that it is essential to broaden the scope of ethics of AI beyond micro- and meso-levels. While ethics guidelines and AI ethics often focus on the responsibility of designers and the competencies and skills of designers to take this responsibility, our results show that many structural challenges are beyond their reach. This result means that while ethics guidelines and AI ethics frameworks are helpful, there is a risk that they overlook more complicated, nuanced, and intersected structural challenges. In addition, it highlights the need to include diverse stakeholders, such as quadruple helix (QH) participants, in discussions around AI ethics rather than solely focusing on the obligations of AI developers and companies. Overall, this paper demonstrates that addressing structural challenges in AI is challenging and requires an approach that considers four requirements: (1) multi-level, (2) multi-faceted, (3) interdisciplinary, and (4) polycentric governance.
本文探讨了从事人工智能(AI)工作的专业人士(N = 32)如何看待人工智能结构性伦理挑战,如超出个体行为者直接意图和控制范围的不公正和不平等现象。本文回答了以下研究问题:专业人士对人工智能(在农业食品领域)的结构性挑战有何看法?这篇实证论文表明,将人工智能伦理的范围扩展到微观和中观层面之外至关重要。虽然伦理准则和人工智能伦理通常侧重于设计者的责任以及设计者承担此责任的能力和技能,但我们的研究结果表明,许多结构性挑战超出了他们的能力范围。这一结果意味着,虽然伦理准则和人工智能伦理框架很有帮助,但存在忽视更复杂、细微和交叉的结构性挑战的风险。此外,它强调了在围绕人工智能伦理的讨论中纳入不同利益相关者的必要性,例如四重螺旋(QH)参与者,而不是仅仅关注人工智能开发者和公司的义务。总体而言,本文表明应对人工智能中的结构性挑战具有挑战性,需要一种考虑四个要求的方法:(1)多层次,(2)多方面,(3)跨学科,以及(4)多中心治理。