• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

透过镜子看人工智能:对人工智能中结构性社会和伦理挑战的实证研究

AI through the looking glass: an empirical study of structural social and ethical challenges in AI.

作者信息

Ryan Mark, de Roo Nina, Wang Hao, Blok Vincent, Atik Can

机构信息

Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Philosophy Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3891-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0. Epub 2024 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0
PMID:40510248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12152039/
Abstract

This paper examines how professionals (N = 32) working on artificial intelligence (AI) view structural AI ethics challenges like injustices and inequalities beyond individual agents' direct intention and control. This paper answers the research question: What are professionals' perceptions of the structural challenges of AI (in the agri-food sector)? This empirical paper shows that it is essential to broaden the scope of ethics of AI beyond micro- and meso-levels. While ethics guidelines and AI ethics often focus on the responsibility of designers and the competencies and skills of designers to take this responsibility, our results show that many structural challenges are beyond their reach. This result means that while ethics guidelines and AI ethics frameworks are helpful, there is a risk that they overlook more complicated, nuanced, and intersected structural challenges. In addition, it highlights the need to include diverse stakeholders, such as quadruple helix (QH) participants, in discussions around AI ethics rather than solely focusing on the obligations of AI developers and companies. Overall, this paper demonstrates that addressing structural challenges in AI is challenging and requires an approach that considers four requirements: (1) multi-level, (2) multi-faceted, (3) interdisciplinary, and (4) polycentric governance.

摘要

本文探讨了从事人工智能(AI)工作的专业人士(N = 32)如何看待人工智能结构性伦理挑战,如超出个体行为者直接意图和控制范围的不公正和不平等现象。本文回答了以下研究问题:专业人士对人工智能(在农业食品领域)的结构性挑战有何看法?这篇实证论文表明,将人工智能伦理的范围扩展到微观和中观层面之外至关重要。虽然伦理准则和人工智能伦理通常侧重于设计者的责任以及设计者承担此责任的能力和技能,但我们的研究结果表明,许多结构性挑战超出了他们的能力范围。这一结果意味着,虽然伦理准则和人工智能伦理框架很有帮助,但存在忽视更复杂、细微和交叉的结构性挑战的风险。此外,它强调了在围绕人工智能伦理的讨论中纳入不同利益相关者的必要性,例如四重螺旋(QH)参与者,而不是仅仅关注人工智能开发者和公司的义务。总体而言,本文表明应对人工智能中的结构性挑战具有挑战性,需要一种考虑四个要求的方法:(1)多层次,(2)多方面,(3)跨学科,以及(4)多中心治理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/c169243beec6/146_2024_2146_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/ce0853f32db0/146_2024_2146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/aba30536b813/146_2024_2146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/76aa3dc9670b/146_2024_2146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/8d84f78b1e7c/146_2024_2146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/dc3f315e8269/146_2024_2146_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/bf73c43bd89e/146_2024_2146_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/c169243beec6/146_2024_2146_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/ce0853f32db0/146_2024_2146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/aba30536b813/146_2024_2146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/76aa3dc9670b/146_2024_2146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/8d84f78b1e7c/146_2024_2146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/dc3f315e8269/146_2024_2146_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/bf73c43bd89e/146_2024_2146_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c0/12152039/c169243beec6/146_2024_2146_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
AI through the looking glass: an empirical study of structural social and ethical challenges in AI.透过镜子看人工智能:对人工智能中结构性社会和伦理挑战的实证研究
AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3891-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
2
Ethics dumping in artificial intelligence.人工智能中的道德倾销。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 8;7:1426761. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1426761. eCollection 2024.
3
Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education.人工智能领域新出现的挑战以及人工智能伦理教育的必要性。
AI Ethics. 2021;1(1):61-65. doi: 10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Research ethics and artificial intelligence for global health: perspectives from the global forum on bioethics in research.研究伦理与全球健康中的人工智能:来自全球研究生物伦理论坛的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 18;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01044-w.
5
Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics.谁来负责?通过信任和道德视角看美国公众对人工智能治理的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):654-672. doi: 10.1177/09636625231224592. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.重建人工智能伦理原则:人工智能的罗尔斯式伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;30(5):46. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y.
7
Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges.迈向医疗保健领域安全可信的人工智能:对新兴创新和伦理挑战的系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Mar;195:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105780. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
8
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI.塑造医疗保健的未来:伦理临床挑战与可信人工智能之路。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 27;14(5):1605. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051605.
9
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
10
Multi Scale Ethics-Why We Need  to Consider the Ethics of AI in Healthcare at Different Scales.多尺度伦理——为何我们需要在不同尺度上考虑医疗 AI 的伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Nov 28;28(6):63. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00396-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance.全球人工智能伦理:对200项人工智能治理指南和建议的综述。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Oct 13;4(10):100857. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857.
2
Reflections on Putting AI Ethics into Practice: How Three AI Ethics Approaches Conceptualize Theory and Practice.将人工智能伦理付诸实践的思考:三种人工智能伦理方法如何概念化理论与实践。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 May 26;29(3):21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00443-3.
3
Recommendations for ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in digital agriculture.
数字农业中人工智能的道德与负责任使用建议。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Jul 29;5:884192. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.884192. eCollection 2022.
4
Automating Agroecology: How to Design a Farming Robot Without a Monocultural Mindset?农业生态学自动化:如何在没有单一栽培思维模式的情况下设计农业机器人?
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2022;35(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09876-x. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles.将价值敏感设计映射到人工智能促进社会公益的原则上。
AI Ethics. 2021;1(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation?致力于负责任人工智能的公司:从原则走向实施与监管?
Philos Technol. 2021;34(4):1135-1193. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach.算法不公正:一种关系伦理方法。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Feb 12;2(2):100205. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.
8
Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence.人工智能设计透明化。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3333-3361. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Prediction paradigm: the human price of instrumentalism.预测范式:工具主义的人类代价。
AI Soc. 2020;35(3):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-01035-6. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
There is a blind spot in AI research.人工智能研究中存在一个盲点。
Nature. 2016 Oct 20;538(7625):311-313. doi: 10.1038/538311a.