• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多方利益相关者参与灾害管理——以新冠疫情为例。

Multistakeholder Participation in Disaster Management-The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Panneer Sigamani, Kantamaneni Komali, Pushparaj Robert Ramesh Babu, Shekhar Sulochana, Bhat Lekha, Rice Louis

机构信息

Department of Social Work, School of Social Sciences and Humanities and Centre for Happiness, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamilnadu 610005, India.

Faculty of Creative Industries, Architecture and Engineering, Solent University, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;9(2):203. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020203.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9020203
PMID:33668669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7918841/
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is affecting society's health, economy, environment and development. COVID-19 has claimed many lives across the globe and severely impacted the livelihood of a considerable section of the world's population. We are still in the process of finding optimal and effective solutions to control the pandemic and minimise its negative impacts. In the process of developing effective strategies to combat COVID-19, different countries have adapted diverse policies, strategies and activities and yet there are no universal or comprehensive solutions to the problem. In this context, this paper brings out a conceptual model of multistakeholder participation governance as an effective model to fight against COVID-19. Accordingly, the current study conducted a scientific review by examining multi-stakeholder disaster response strategies, particularly in relation to COVID-19. The study then presents a conceptual framework for multistakeholder participation governance as one of the effective models to fight against COVID-19. Subsequently, the article offers strategies for rebuilding the economy and healthcare system through multi-stakeholder participation, and gives policy directions/decisions based on evidence to save lives and protect livelihoods. The current study also provides evidence about multidimensional approaches and multi-diplomatic mechanisms during the COVID-19 crisis, in order to examine dimensions of multi-stakeholder participation in disaster management and to document innovative, collaborative strategic directions across the globe. The current research findings highlight the need for global collaboration by working together to put an end to this pandemic situation through the application of a Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Support System (MS-SDSS).

摘要

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在影响社会的健康、经济、环境和发展。COVID-19已在全球夺走许多生命,并严重影响了世界相当一部分人口的生计。我们仍在寻找最佳和有效的解决方案来控制这一流行病并尽量减少其负面影响。在制定抗击COVID-19的有效战略过程中,不同国家采取了不同的政策、战略和行动,但对于这个问题尚无普遍或全面的解决方案。在此背景下,本文提出了一个多利益相关方参与治理的概念模型,作为抗击COVID-19的有效模式。相应地,本研究通过审视多利益相关方灾害应对战略,特别是与COVID-19相关的战略,进行了一项科学综述。该研究随后提出了一个多利益相关方参与治理的概念框架,作为抗击COVID-19的有效模式之一。随后,本文提供了通过多利益相关方参与来重建经济和医疗体系的战略,并基于证据给出政策方向/决策,以拯救生命和保护生计。本研究还提供了关于COVID-19危机期间多维方法和多外交机制的证据,以审视多利益相关方参与灾害管理的维度,并记录全球各地创新的、协作的战略方向。当前的研究结果强调了通过应用多利益相关方空间决策支持系统(MS-SDSS)共同努力来结束这种大流行状况的全球合作的必要性。

相似文献

1
Multistakeholder Participation in Disaster Management-The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic.多方利益相关者参与灾害管理——以新冠疫情为例。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;9(2):203. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020203.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of crisis and disasters risk management in COVID-19 times: Insights and lessons learned from Saudi Arabia.新冠疫情时期危机与灾害风险管理的影响:来自沙特阿拉伯的见解与经验教训
Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Sep;18:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100705. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Are we there yet? The transition from response to recovery for the COVID-19 pandemic.我们到了吗?新冠疫情从应对到恢复的过渡。
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Oct;7:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100102. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
Tuberculosis结核病
6
Global key concepts of civil-military cooperation for disaster management in the COVID-19 pandemic-A qualitative phenomenological scoping review.全球 COVID-19 大流行期间军民合作管理灾害的关键概念:一项定性现象学范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:975667. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975667. eCollection 2022.
7
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures.多准则框架下的大流行病应对措施
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;9:583706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706. eCollection 2021.
8
Multisectoral action towards sustainable development goal 3.d and building health systems resilience during and beyond COVID-19: Findings from an INTOSAI development initiative and World Health Organization collaboration.多部门行动以实现可持续发展目标 3.d 并在 COVID-19 期间和之后增强卫生系统的弹性:来自国际审计组织发展倡议和世界卫生组织合作的发现。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 19;11:1104669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104669. eCollection 2023.
9
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder's response to COVID-19 using Protective Action Decision Model: Perception of Saudi citizens.利益相关者使用保护行动决策模型对COVID-19的反应:沙特公民的认知
Jamba. 2025 Jun 5;17(1):1886. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1886. eCollection 2025.
2
Public participation in decisions about measures to manage the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.公众参与管理 COVID-19 大流行措施决策:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jun 3;9(6):e014404. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014404.
3
Study on the logic and effectiveness of crisis learning in the promotion policy adjustment: an observation based on the adjustment of COVID-19 prevention policy in China.

本文引用的文献

1
The Turkish state's responses to existential COVID-19 crisis.土耳其国家对新冠疫情生存危机的应对措施。
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 23;39(3):424-441. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783786. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong.低信任状态下的政策制定:香港的合法性、国家能力与对新冠疫情的应对
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 23;39(3):403-423. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Policy learning and crisis policy-making: quadruple-loop learning and COVID-19 responses in South Korea.
关于危机学习在促进政策调整中的逻辑和效果的研究:基于中国新冠肺炎疫情防控政策调整的观察。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1324420. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1324420. eCollection 2023.
4
Cross-sector decision landscape in response to COVID-19: A qualitative network mapping analysis of North Carolina decision-makers.跨部门应对 COVID-19 的决策格局:北卡罗来纳州决策者的定性网络绘图分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;10:906602. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.906602. eCollection 2022.
5
Health, Economic and Social Development Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strategies for Multiple and Interconnected Issues.新冠疫情的健康、经济和社会发展挑战:应对多重相互关联问题的策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;10(5):770. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050770.
6
The Great Lockdown in the Wake of COVID-19 and Its Implications: Lessons for Low and Middle-Income Countries.新冠疫情后的大封锁及其影响:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010610.
政策学习与危机决策:韩国的四重循环学习与新冠疫情应对措施
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 28;39(3):363-381. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1785195. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Policy capacity and Singapore's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.政策能力与新加坡对新冠疫情的应对
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 18;39(3):345-362. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783789. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses.动员应对新冠疫情的政策(无)能力:理解各国应对措施的差异
Policy Soc. 2020 Jul 3;39(3):285-308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
COVID-19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences.德国的新冠疫情防控政策及其社会、政治和心理影响。
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):191-202. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1091. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Why the COVID-19 response needs International Relations.为何新冠疫情应对需要国际关系。
Int Aff. 2020 Sep 1;96(5):1227-1251. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiaa135. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020.印度尼西亚当前对2019冠状病毒病应对措施的回顾与分析:2020年1月至3月期间
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Apr;6:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
9
Face masks, public policies and slowing the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from Canada.口罩、公共政策与减缓 COVID-19 传播:来自加拿大的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;78:102475. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102475. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.台湾和新西兰应对新冠疫情的卫生举措带来的潜在经验教训。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Nov;4:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044. Epub 2020 Oct 21.