Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0248234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248234. eCollection 2021.
In the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, public health experts have produced guidelines to limit the spread of the coronavirus, but individuals do not always comply with experts' recommendations. Here, we tested whether a specific psychological belief-identification with all humanity-predicts cooperation with public health guidelines as well as helpful behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that peoples' endorsement of this belief-their relative perception of a connection and moral commitment to other humans-would predict their tendencies to adopt World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and to help others. To assess this, we conducted a global online study (N = 2537 participants) of four WHO-recommended health behaviors and four pandemic-related moral dilemmas that we constructed to be relevant to helping others at a potential cost to oneself. We used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) that included 10 predictor variables (demographic, contextual, and psychological) for each of five outcome measures (a WHO cooperative health behavior score, plus responses to each of our four moral, helping dilemmas). Identification with all humanity was the most consistent and consequential predictor of individuals' cooperative health behavior and helpful responding. Analyses showed that the identification with all humanity significantly predicted each of the five outcomes while controlling for the other variables (Prange < 10-22 to < 0.009). The mean effect size of the identification with all humanity predictor on these outcomes was more than twice as large as the effect sizes of other predictors. Identification with all humanity is a psychological construct that, through targeted interventions, may help scientists and policymakers to better understand and promote cooperative health behavior and help-oriented concern for others during the current pandemic as well as in future humanitarian crises.
在持续的 COVID-19 大流行期间,公共卫生专家制定了限制冠状病毒传播的指南,但个人并不总是遵守专家的建议。在这里,我们测试了一种特定的心理信念——对全人类的认同——是否能预测个人对公共卫生指南的合作以及在 COVID-19 大流行期间的帮助行为。我们假设,人们对这种信念的认可——他们对与他人的联系和道德承诺的相对感知——将预测他们采取世界卫生组织(WHO)指南和帮助他人的倾向。为了评估这一点,我们进行了一项全球在线研究(共有 2537 名参与者),研究了 WHO 推荐的四项健康行为和四项与大流行相关的道德困境,这些困境是为了在对自己造成潜在代价的情况下帮助他人而构建的。我们使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM),对五个结果测量(WHO 合作健康行为得分,以及对我们四个道德、帮助困境的每个回答)中的每一个都包含 10 个预测变量(人口统计学、环境和心理学)。对全人类的认同是个人合作健康行为和乐于助人反应的最一致和最具影响力的预测因素。分析表明,在控制其他变量的情况下,对全人类的认同显著预测了五个结果中的每一个(Prange < 10-22 到 < 0.009)。对全人类的认同预测因素对这些结果的平均效应大小是其他预测因素效应大小的两倍多。对全人类的认同是一种心理结构,通过有针对性的干预措施,可能有助于科学家和政策制定者更好地理解和促进当前大流行期间以及未来人道主义危机中的合作健康行为和对他人的帮助导向关注。