Shaikh Farhan, Janaapureddy Yeshwanth R, Mohanty Shashwat, Reddy Preetham K, Sachane Kapil, Dekate Parag S, Yerra Anupama, Chirla Dinesh
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Rainbow Children' s Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;25(2):181-184. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23737.
To study if protocolized monitoring of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure every 6 hours is better than adjusting endotracheal tube cuff inflation by the only bedside clinical assessment.
This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled study done between July 1, 2017 and March 31, 2019. Children between 1 month and 18 years, intubated with cuffed ETT by our trained doctors were included. After obtaining consent, patients were randomized into two groups, standard group (SG) and cuff pressure monitoring group (MG). Sample size was calculated with 80 patients in each group with a power of 80%, significance level (alpha 0.05 and beta 0.2). In the SG, ETT cuff inflation was adjusted by clinical assessment (bedside minimal leak technique and monitoring the percentage of leak displayed on ventilator display) at 6 hours interval. In the MG, cuff pressures were monitored by the device every 6 hours to maintain between 20 and 25 mm Hg.
Out of 543 mechanically ventilated children during the study period, 266 were eligible and randomized for study. During the study, 89 patients died and 17 were left against medical advice, leaving 80 patients in each group. Incidence of post-extubation stridor (PES), re-intubation rate, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rate, ventilator days, and length of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay were analyzed and found no advantage of protocolized monitoring of cuff pressures in the reduction of any of the above variables.
Our findings if confirmed by large multicentric studies can bring an end to routine ETT cuff pressure measurements and emphasize more on clinical assessment. Clinical trial registry (CTRI/2019/05/019098).Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (2021): 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23737.
Shaikh F, Janaapureddy YR, Mohanty S, Reddy PK, Sachane K, Dekate PS, Utility of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitoring in Mechanically Ventilated (MV) Children in Preventing Post-extubation Stridor (PES). Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):181-184.
研究每6小时对气管内插管(ETT)套囊压力进行规范化监测是否优于仅通过床边临床评估来调整气管内插管套囊的充气情况。
这是一项于2017年7月1日至2019年3月31日在单中心进行的前瞻性随机对照研究。纳入由我们训练有素的医生使用带套囊的ETT进行插管的1个月至18岁儿童。获得同意后,将患者随机分为两组,即标准组(SG)和套囊压力监测组(MG)。每组计算样本量为80例患者,检验效能为80%,显著性水平(α=0.05,β=0.2)。在SG组,通过临床评估(床边最小漏气技术和监测呼吸机显示屏上显示的漏气百分比)每隔6小时调整ETT套囊的充气情况。在MG组,每隔6小时使用设备监测套囊压力,使其维持在20至25 mmHg之间。
在研究期间的543例机械通气儿童中,266例符合条件并被随机分组进行研究。研究期间,89例患者死亡,17例自动出院,每组各剩余80例患者。分析拔管后喘鸣(PES)的发生率、再插管率、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率、机械通气天数以及儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院时间,发现规范化监测套囊压力在降低上述任何变量方面并无优势。
如果我们的研究结果得到大型多中心研究的证实,那么可以不再进行常规的ETT套囊压力测量,而应更加强调临床评估。临床试验注册编号(CTRI/2019/05/019098)。《印度重症医学杂志》(2021年):10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23737。
谢赫F,贾纳普雷迪YR,莫汉蒂S,雷迪PK,萨钱内K,德卡特PS,气管内插管套囊压力监测在预防机械通气(MV)儿童拔管后喘鸣(PES)中的作用。《印度重症医学杂志》2021年;25(2):181-184。