• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物标志物和评分在描述尿脓毒症中的作用。

The Role of Biomarkers and Scores in Describing Urosepsis.

机构信息

Clinical Emergency County Hospital "Sf. Ap. Andrei", 800578 Galați, Romania.

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dunarea de Jos University, 800008 Galați, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 17;59(3):597. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030597.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59030597
PMID:36984597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10059648/
Abstract

: Patients with urinary tract obstruction (UTO) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) are at risk of developing urosepsis, whose evolution involves increased morbidity, mortality and cost. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of already existing scores and biomarkers to diagnose, describe the clinical status, and predict the evolution of patients with complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) and their risk of progressing to urosepsis. : We conducted a retrospective study including patients diagnosed with UTI hospitalized in the urology department of" Sfântul Apostol Andrei" County Emergency Clinical Hospital (GCH) in Galati, Romania, from September 2019 to May 2022. The inclusion criteria were: UTI proven by urine culture or diagnosed clinically complicated with UTO, fever or shaking chills, and purulent collections, such as psoas abscess, Fournier Syndrome, renal abscess, and paraurethral abscess, showing SIRS. The exclusion criteria were: patients age < 18 years, pregnancy, history of kidney transplantation, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, and patients with missing data. We used the Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and qSOFA (quick SOFA) scores, and procalcitonin (PCT) to describe the clinical status of the patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assesses pre-existing morbidities. The hospitalization days and costs and the days of intensive care were considered. Depending on the diagnosis at admission, we divided the patients into three groups: SIRS, sepsis and septic shock. The fourth group was represented by patients who died during hospitalization. : A total of 174 patients with complicated UTIs were enrolled in this study. From this total, 46 were enrolled in the SIRS group, 88 in the urosepsis group, and 40 in the septic shock group. A total of 23 patients died during hospitalization and were enrolled in the deceased group. An upward trend of age along with worsening symptoms was highlighted with an average of 56.86 years in the case of SIRS, 60.37 years in the sepsis group, 69.03 years in the septic shock, and 71.04 years in the case of deceased patients ( < 0.04). A statistically significant association between PCT and complex scores (SOFA, CCI and qSOFA) with the evolution of urosepsis was highlighted. Increased hospitalization costs can be observed in the case of deceased patients and those with septic shock and statistically significantly lower in the case of those with SIRS. The predictability of discriminating urosepsis stages was assessed by using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and very good specificity and sensitivity was identified in predicting the risk of death for PCT (69.57%, 77.33%), the SOFA (91.33%, 76.82%), qSOFA (91.30%, 74.17%) scores, and CCI (65.22%, 88.74%). The AUC value was best for qSOFA (90.3%). For the SIRS group, the PCT (specificity 91.30%, sensitivity 85.71%) and SOFA (specificity 84.78%, sensitivity 78.74%), qSOFA scores (specificity 84.78%, sensitivity 76, 34%) proved to be relevant in establishing the diagnosis. In the case of the septic shock group, the qSOFA (specificity 92.5%, sensitivity 82.71%) and SOFA (specificity 97.5%, sensitivity 77.44%) as well as PCT (specificity 80%, sensitivity 85.61%) are statistically significant disease-defining variables. An important deficit in the tools needed to classify patients into the sepsis group is obvious. All the variables have an increased specificity but a low sensitivity. This translates into a risk of a false negative diagnosis. : Although SOFA and qSOFA scores adequately describe patients with septic shock and they are independent prognostic predictors of mortality, they fail to be accurate in diagnosing sepsis. These scores should not replace the conventional triage protocol. In our study, PCT proved to be a disease-defining marker and an independent prognostic predictor of mortality. Patients with important comorbidities, CCI greater than 10, should be treated more aggressively because of increased mortality.

摘要

: 患有尿路梗阻 (UTO) 和全身炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 的患者有发生尿脓毒症的风险,其发展涉及更高的发病率、死亡率和成本。本研究旨在评估现有的评分和生物标志物在诊断、描述临床状况以及预测复杂尿路感染 (UTI) 患者的病情演变及其向尿脓毒症发展的风险方面的能力。 : 我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2019 年 9 月至 2022 年 5 月在罗马尼亚加拉茨的“圣使徒安德鲁”县急症临床医院 (GCH) 泌尿科住院的 UTI 患者。纳入标准为:尿培养证实 UTI 或临床诊断为复杂 UTO,发热或寒战,有脓性积聚,如腰大肌脓肿、Fournier 综合征、肾脓肿和尿道旁脓肿,表现为 SIRS。排除标准为:年龄 < 18 岁、妊娠、肾移植、血液透析或腹膜透析史以及数据缺失的患者。我们使用序贯 (相关) 器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 和快速 SOFA (qSOFA) 评分以及降钙素原 (PCT) 来描述患者的临床状况。 Charlson 合并症指数 (CCI) 用于评估预先存在的合并症。住院天数和费用以及重症监护天数都被考虑在内。根据入院时的诊断,我们将患者分为三组:SIRS、败血症和败血症性休克。第四组由住院期间死亡的患者组成。 : 共有 174 名复杂 UTI 患者纳入本研究。其中 46 例被纳入 SIRS 组,88 例被纳入尿脓毒症组,40 例被纳入败血症性休克组。共有 23 名患者在住院期间死亡,被纳入死亡组。随着症状的加重,年龄呈上升趋势,SIRS 组平均年龄为 56.86 岁,败血症组为 60.37 岁,败血症性休克组为 69.03 岁,死亡组为 71.04 岁(<0.04)。PCT 与复杂评分(SOFA、CCI 和 qSOFA)与尿脓毒症的发展之间存在统计学显著关联。死亡患者和败血症性休克患者的住院费用增加,而 SIRS 患者的住院费用明显降低。通过使用 ROC 曲线下面积 (AUC) 评估了区分尿脓毒症阶段的预测能力,发现 PCT(特异性 69.57%,敏感性 77.33%)、SOFA(特异性 91.33%,敏感性 76.82%)、qSOFA(特异性 91.30%,敏感性 74.17%)和 CCI(特异性 65.22%,敏感性 88.74%)对预测死亡风险的预测性非常好。qSOFA 的 AUC 值最佳(90.3%)。对于 SIRS 组,PCT(特异性 91.30%,敏感性 85.71%)和 SOFA(特异性 84.78%,敏感性 78.74%)、qSOFA 评分(特异性 84.78%,敏感性 76.34%)被证明在建立诊断方面具有相关性。对于败血症性休克组,qSOFA(特异性 92.5%,敏感性 82.71%)和 SOFA(特异性 97.5%,敏感性 77.44%)以及 PCT(特异性 80%,敏感性 85.61%)是统计学上显著的疾病定义变量。在将患者分类为败血症组的工具中存在明显的不足。所有变量的特异性都增加,但敏感性较低。这转化为假阴性诊断的风险。 : 尽管 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分能够充分描述败血症性休克患者的病情,并且是死亡率的独立预后预测指标,但它们在诊断败血症方面并不准确。这些评分不应替代常规分诊方案。在我们的研究中,PCT 被证明是一种疾病定义标志物和死亡率的独立预后预测指标。CCI 大于 10 的患者有重要的合并症,应更积极地治疗,因为死亡率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/35b296e0d285/medicina-59-00597-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/81b6270ce5af/medicina-59-00597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/05d3ed2e3a15/medicina-59-00597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/38ad8b25d602/medicina-59-00597-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/35b296e0d285/medicina-59-00597-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/81b6270ce5af/medicina-59-00597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/05d3ed2e3a15/medicina-59-00597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/38ad8b25d602/medicina-59-00597-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3bc/10059648/35b296e0d285/medicina-59-00597-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Biomarkers and Scores in Describing Urosepsis.生物标志物和评分在描述尿脓毒症中的作用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 17;59(3):597. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030597.
2
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
3
Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.SOFA、qSOFA 和 SIRS 预测经皮肾镜取石术后脓毒性休克的表现。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):501-510. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03183-2. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Predicting Septic Shock After Emergent Ureteral Stenting in Stone-Related Obstruction and Presumed Infections.预测急诊输尿管支架置入术后与结石相关梗阻和疑似感染所致的感染性休克。
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):127-132. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0200.
5
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
6
[Diagnosis accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score for adult sepsis patient with soft tissue infection].[快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对成人软组织感染性脓毒症患者的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug;31(8):933-937. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.004.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
8
The Combined SIRS + qSOFA (qSIRS) Score is More Accurate Than qSOFA Alone in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Surgical Sepsis in an LMIC Emergency Department.联合 SIRS + qSOFA(qSIRS)评分比单独 qSOFA 更能准确预测中低收入国家急诊外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05181-x.
9
Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection.降钙素原在预测尿路感染患者感染性休克中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00906-4.
10
Procalcitonin and MR-Proadrenomedullin Combination with SOFA and qSOFA Scores for Sepsis Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Diagnostic Algorithm.降钙素原和 MR 前肾上腺髓质素联合 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分对脓毒症的诊断和预后:一种诊断算法。
Shock. 2018 Jul;50(1):44-52. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001023.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Emergency Department Antibiotic Discordance on the Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Urinary Tract Infections: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科抗生素使用不一致对住院尿路感染患者结局的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):545. doi: 10.3390/life15040545.
2
Identification of amino acid metabolism‑related genes as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in sepsis through machine learning.通过机器学习鉴定氨基酸代谢相关基因作为脓毒症的诊断和预后生物标志物
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Dec 20;29(2):36. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12786. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Dynamics of Urinary Extracellular DNA in Urosepsis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Urosepsis-A Literature Review.尿路脓毒症——文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 25;57(9):872. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090872.
2
Heterogeneity of Antibiotics Multidrug-Resistance Profile of Uropathogens in Romanian Population.罗马尼亚人群尿路病原体抗生素多药耐药谱的异质性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 2;10(5):523. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050523.
3
Spectrum and Antibiotic Resistance of Uropathogens in Romanian Females.罗马尼亚女性尿路病原体的谱型及抗生素耐药性
尿脓毒症中外泌体 DNA 的动力学。
Biomolecules. 2023 Jun 17;13(6):1008. doi: 10.3390/biom13061008.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Aug 1;9(8):472. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080472.
4
A Clinical Perspective on the Antimicrobial Resistance Spectrum of Uropathogens in a Romanian Male Population.罗马尼亚男性人群尿路病原体抗菌药物耐药谱的临床视角
Microorganisms. 2020 Jun 5;8(6):848. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060848.
5
The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.
6
The procalcitonin/albumin ratio as an early diagnostic predictor in discriminating urosepsis from patients with febrile urinary tract infection.降钙素原/白蛋白比值作为鉴别泌尿道脓毒症与发热性尿路感染患者的早期诊断预测指标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11078. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011078.
7
[Predictive value of SOFA, qSOFA score and traditional evaluation index on sepsis prognosis].[序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分及传统评估指标对脓毒症预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Aug;29(8):700-704. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.08.006.
8
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
9
The Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin Versus Other Biomarkers in Prediction of Bloodstream Infection.降钙素原与其他生物标志物在预测血流感染中的诊断价值
Clin Lab. 2017 Feb 1;63(2):277-285. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160802.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.