Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Faculty of Medicine, Roohani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Department of Medical Mycology, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, 47745-47176, Babol, Iran.
Mycopathologia. 2021 May;186(2):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s11046-021-00537-1. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Fungal otitis externa, an infection of the external auditory canal caused by molds and yeasts, accounts for approximately 10-20% of ear canal infections accompanying high recurrence. The purpose of the current study was to assess the pattern of etiological agents of otomycosis and resistance profile as well as the rate of tympanic membrane perforation. A total of 1040 patients with symptoms of fungal otitis externa, in a period of two years, were investigated. The mycological tests revealed the presence of different fungi in 237 ears (22.8%). Fungal otitis was more related to filamentous fungi of the species Aspergillus flavus (54.43%), A. tubingensis (10.97%), and A. niger (8.86%), followed by yeasts, Candida orthopsilosis (7.59%), C. albicans (6.75%), and C. parapsilosis (5.06%). Tympanic membrane perforation rate was found to be 6.75% and was more common with otomycosis caused by A. flavus, A. tubingensis and C. albicans. In antifungal susceptibility tests, all tested drugs showed generally good activity against most isolates of molds and yeasts, while tolnaftate, clotrimazole, nystatin, and terbinafine had lowest effects. We found that among Aspergillus isolates, one A. niger isolate was resistant to voriconazole, and one A. flavus isolate was resistant to amphotericin B. Furthermore, among Candida species, three isolates of C. orthopsilosis showed high MIC values to fluconazole, two C. albicans isolates were considered fluconazole resistant and one isolate of C. parapsilosis was resistant to caspofungin and 3 isolates were resistant to fluconazole. Regarding the existence of the cases with perforated tympanic membrane and emerging species causing fungal otitis in the current report, the importance of the early physical examination, precise molecular identification, and the antifungal susceptibility evaluation is highlighted.
真菌性外耳道炎是一种由霉菌和酵母菌引起的外耳道感染,约占伴有高复发率的耳道感染的 10-20%。本研究的目的是评估耳霉菌病的病原体模式和耐药谱以及鼓膜穿孔率。在两年的时间里,对 1040 名有真菌性外耳道炎症状的患者进行了调查。 1040 名患者中,237 名患者(22.8%)的真菌学检查显示存在不同的真菌。真菌性外耳道炎与黄曲霉(54.43%)、烟曲霉(10.97%)和黑曲霉(8.86%)等丝状真菌关系更为密切,其次是念珠菌属,近平滑念珠菌(7.59%)、白念珠菌(6.75%)和葡萄牙念珠菌(5.06%)。发现鼓膜穿孔率为 6.75%,且由黄曲霉、烟曲霉和白念珠菌引起的耳霉菌病更为常见。在抗真菌药敏试验中,所有测试药物对大多数霉菌和酵母菌分离株均表现出良好的活性,而托萘酯、克霉唑、制霉菌素和特比萘芬的效果最差。我们发现,在黑曲霉分离株中,1 株黑曲霉对伏立康唑耐药,1 株黄曲霉对两性霉素 B 耐药。此外,在念珠菌属中,3 株近平滑念珠菌对氟康唑的 MIC 值较高,2 株白念珠菌被认为对氟康唑耐药,1 株葡萄牙念珠菌对卡泊芬净耐药,3 株对氟康唑耐药。关于当前报告中存在鼓膜穿孔和新出现的引起真菌性外耳道炎的病例,强调了早期体格检查、准确的分子鉴定和抗真菌药敏评估的重要性。