Cavelti Marialuisa, Lerch Stefan, Ghinea Denisa, Fischer-Waldschmidt Gloria, Resch Franz, Koenig Julian, Kaess Michael
University Hospital for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Section for Translational Psychobiology in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Feb 26;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00147-9.
The heterogeneous presentation of borderline personality disorder (BPD) represents a clinical challenge. There is an ongoing scientific debate whether the heterogeneity can best be understood in terms of qualitative (categorical) or quantitative (dimensional) differences between individuals. The present study examined the latent structure of BPD in adolescents.
Five-hundred and six outpatients aged 12 to 17 years with risk-taking and/or self-harming behavior were assessed at baseline and one-year follow-up. Latent class analysis (corresponding with the categorical approach), factor analysis (corresponding with the dimensional approach), and factor mixture models (allowing for both categorical and dimensional aspects) were applied to the DSM-IV BPD criteria.
The best fitting model distinguished between a majority class with high probabilities for all BPD criteria ("borderline group") and a minority class with high probabilities for the impulsivity and anger criteria only ("impulsive group"). Sex significantly affected latent class membership, and both a latent factor and age explained within-class variability. The borderline group primarily consisted of females, frequently reported adverse childhood experiences, scored high on the emotion dysregulation and inhibitedness personality traits, and was associated with internalizing psychopathology. In contrast, the impulsive group primarily consisted of males, scored high on the dissocial behavior personality trait, and was associated with externalizing psychopathology. After one year, the two groups showed similar clinical improvement.
The study provides evidence for two distinct subgroups of adolescents with BPD features that resemble the subtypes of the ICD-10 emotionally unstable personality disorder. More research is needed to further investigate the diagnostic stability of the two groups over time and potential differential treatment indications.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的异质性表现是一项临床挑战。关于这种异质性是最好从个体间的质性(分类)差异还是量性(维度)差异来理解,目前仍存在科学争论。本研究考察了青少年BPD的潜在结构。
对506名年龄在12至17岁、有冒险和/或自我伤害行为的门诊患者进行了基线评估和一年随访。将潜在类别分析(对应分类方法)、因素分析(对应维度方法)和因素混合模型(兼顾分类和维度方面)应用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的BPD标准。
最佳拟合模型区分出一个对所有BPD标准概率都很高的多数类别(“边缘型组”)和一个仅对冲动和愤怒标准概率很高的少数类别(“冲动组”)。性别显著影响潜在类别归属,一个潜在因素和年龄都解释了类别内的变异性。边缘型组主要由女性组成,经常报告有不良童年经历,在情绪失调和抑制性人格特质上得分较高,且与内化性精神病理学相关。相比之下,冲动组主要由男性组成,在反社会行为人格特质上得分较高,且与外化性精神病理学相关。一年后,两组显示出相似的临床改善。
该研究为具有BPD特征的青少年存在两个不同亚组提供了证据,这两个亚组类似于《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)中情绪不稳定人格障碍的亚型。需要更多研究来进一步调查这两组随时间推移的诊断稳定性以及潜在的差异治疗指征。