• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒感染风险的暴露密度和邻里差异。

Exposure density and neighborhood disparities in COVID-19 infection risk.

机构信息

Marron Institute of Urban Management, New York University, New York, NY 10011.

Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021258118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2021258118
PMID:33727410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8020638/
Abstract

Although there is increasing awareness of disparities in COVID-19 infection risk among vulnerable communities, the effect of behavioral interventions at the scale of individual neighborhoods has not been fully studied. We develop a method to quantify neighborhood activity behaviors at high spatial and temporal resolutions and test whether, and to what extent, behavioral responses to social-distancing policies vary with socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. We define ([Formula: see text]) as a measure of both the localized volume of activity in a defined area and the proportion of activity occurring in distinct land-use types. Using detailed neighborhood data for New York City, we quantify neighborhood exposure density using anonymized smartphone geolocation data over a 3-mo period covering more than 12 million unique devices and rasterize granular land-use information to contextualize observed activity. Next, we analyze disparities in community social distancing by estimating variations in neighborhood activity by land-use type before and after a mandated stay-at-home order. Finally, we evaluate the effects of localized demographic, socioeconomic, and built-environment density characteristics on infection rates and deaths in order to identify disparities in health outcomes related to exposure risk. Our findings demonstrate distinct behavioral patterns across neighborhoods after the stay-at-home order and that these variations in exposure density had a direct and measurable impact on the risk of infection. Notably, we find that an additional 10% reduction in exposure density city-wide could have saved between 1,849 and 4,068 lives during the study period, predominantly in lower-income and minority communities.

摘要

尽管人们越来越意识到脆弱社区在 COVID-19 感染风险方面存在差异,但针对个别社区规模的行为干预措施的效果尚未得到充分研究。我们开发了一种方法来量化高时空分辨率的邻里活动行为,并检验社会隔离政策的行为反应是否以及在何种程度上因社会经济和人口特征而异。我们将 ([公式:见正文]) 定义为衡量特定区域内活动局部量和不同土地利用类型活动比例的指标。我们使用纽约市的详细邻里数据,使用覆盖超过 1200 万个独特设备的 3 个月匿名智能手机地理位置数据量化邻里暴露密度,并将粒度土地利用信息栅格化以将观察到的活动置于上下文中。接下来,我们通过在强制居家令前后估计按土地利用类型划分的邻里活动变化来分析社区社会隔离方面的差异。最后,我们评估局部人口统计、社会经济和建筑环境密度特征对感染率和死亡率的影响,以确定与暴露风险相关的健康结果差异。我们的研究结果表明,居家令后邻里之间存在明显的行为模式差异,这种暴露密度的变化对感染风险直接产生了可衡量的影响。值得注意的是,我们发现全市范围内将暴露密度降低 10%,在研究期间可能会挽救 1849 至 4068 条生命,主要是在低收入和少数族裔社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/85f26d7d0eb1/pnas.2021258118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/3cb8dd21cb25/pnas.2021258118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/27901aa3b3cb/pnas.2021258118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/85f26d7d0eb1/pnas.2021258118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/3cb8dd21cb25/pnas.2021258118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/27901aa3b3cb/pnas.2021258118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ab/8020638/85f26d7d0eb1/pnas.2021258118fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Exposure density and neighborhood disparities in COVID-19 infection risk.新冠病毒感染风险的暴露密度和邻里差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021258118.
2
Neighborhood-level disparities and subway utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.纽约市 COVID-19 大流行期间邻里层面的差异和地铁使用情况。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 17;12(1):3692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24088-7.
3
Persistent disparities in SARS-CoV-2 test percent positivity by neighborhood in New York City, March 1-July 25, 2020.2020 年 3 月 1 日至 7 月 25 日期间,纽约市各社区 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性率持续存在差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;63:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Racial and Neighborhood-Level Disparities in COVID-19 Incidence among Patients on Hemodialysis in New York City.纽约市血液透析患者 COVID-19 发病率的种族和社区水平差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Aug;32(8):2048-2056. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020111606. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Measuring sensitivity to social distancing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.测量 COVID-19 大流行期间对社交距离行为的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 29;12(1):16350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20198-4.
6
Differential COVID-19 case positivity in New York City neighborhoods: Socioeconomic factors and mobility.纽约市社区中 COVID-19 病例阳性率的差异:社会经济因素和流动性。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021 Mar;15(2):209-217. doi: 10.1111/irv.12816. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
COVID-19 and Inequity: a Comparative Spatial Analysis of New York City and Chicago Hot Spots.COVID-19 与不平等:对纽约市和芝加哥热点地区的比较空间分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00468-0.
8
Association between neighborhood socioeconomic status, built environment and SARS-CoV-2 infection among cancer patients treated at a Tertiary Cancer Center in New York City.纽约市一家三级癌症中心治疗的癌症患者中,社区社会经济地位、建成环境与 SARS-CoV-2 感染之间的关联。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;6(2):e1714. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1714. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
9
Neighborhood Inequalities in Hepatitis C Mortality: Spatial and Temporal Patterns and Associated Factors.社区间丙型肝炎死亡率的不平等:空间和时间模式及相关因素。
J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):746-755. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0174-x.
10
Spatial Disparities in Coronavirus Incidence and Mortality in the United States: An Ecological Analysis as of May 2020.美国冠状病毒发病率和死亡率的空间差异:截至 2020 年 5 月的生态分析。
J Rural Health. 2020 Jun;36(3):433-445. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12476. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavior-driven forecasts of neighborhood-level COVID-19 spread in New York City.纽约市社区层面新冠病毒传播的行为驱动预测。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 29;21(4):e1012979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012979. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Associations Between Experiences of Racial Discrimination Across the Life Course and Mental Health: Exploring Direct and Indirect Pathways.一生当中种族歧视经历与心理健康之间的关联:探索直接和间接途径。
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 May;47(4):e70023. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70023.
3
Pathogenic built environment? Reflections on modeling spatial determinants of health in urban settings considering the example of COVID-19 studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of ventilation on the indoor spread of COVID-19.通风对新型冠状病毒肺炎室内传播的影响。
J Fluid Mech. 2020 Sep 28;903:F1. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.720.
2
The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States.《新冠疫情政策对美国社交隔离行为的即时影响》
Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults.新冠疫情期间的早期认知与行为反应:一项针对英国成年人的横断面调查
致病的建筑环境?以新冠疫情研究为例,对城市环境中健康空间决定因素建模的思考
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;13:1502897. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1502897. eCollection 2025.
4
Structural inequalities exacerbate infection disparities.结构性不平等加剧了感染差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91008-w.
5
Integrative systems biology framework discovers common gene regulatory signatures in mechanistically distinct inflammatory skin diseases.整合系统生物学框架在机制上不同的炎症性皮肤病中发现了共同的基因调控特征。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2025 Feb 27;11(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41540-025-00498-x.
6
How did COVID-19 case distribution associate with the urban built environment? A community-level exploration in Shanghai focusing on non-linear relationship.**标题**:COVID-19 病例分布与城市建成环境有何关联?以上海为例的社区层面研究聚焦于非线性关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0309019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309019. eCollection 2024.
7
The causal relationship model of factors influencing COVID-19 preventive behaviors during the post-pandemic era and implications for health prevention strategies: a case of Bangkok City, Thailand.后疫情时代影响 COVID-19 预防行为因素的因果关系模型及对卫生预防策略的启示:以泰国曼谷市为例。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09818-8.
8
SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a highly vulnerable population of Brazil: a household cohort study.巴西高危人群中的新型冠状病毒传播:一项家庭队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jun 18;36:100824. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100824. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Population Behavior Changes Underlying Phasic Shifts of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Settings Across 3 Omicron Epidemic Waves in Hong Kong: Prospective Cohort Study.人口行为变化是 SARS-CoV-2 暴露环境在香港 3 次奥密克戎疫情波次中阶段性转变的基础:前瞻性队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 19;10:e51498. doi: 10.2196/51498.
10
Compact living or policy inaction? Effects of urban density and lockdown on the COVID-19 outbreak in the US.紧凑居住还是政策不作为?美国城市密度和封锁措施对新冠疫情爆发的影响。
Urban Stud. 2023 Jul;60(9):1588-1609. doi: 10.1177/00420980221127401. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):e043577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577.
4
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality and neighborhood characteristics in Chicago.2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡率与芝加哥社区特征的关系
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Apr;56:47-54.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的邻里收入与物理隔离。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1294-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00998-2. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
The use of mobile phone data to inform analysis of COVID-19 pandemic epidemiology.利用手机数据为新冠疫情流行病学分析提供信息。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 30;11(1):4961. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18190-5.
8
Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.大流行政治:新冠疫情时期的州级社会隔离应对措施的时机选择。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.
9
Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity.空间异质性可导致 COVID-19 发病时间和严重程度的显著局部变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24180-24187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011656117. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Association of Mobile Phone Location Data Indications of Travel and Stay-at-Home Mandates With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the US.手机定位数据显示的出行和居家令与美国 COVID-19 感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2020485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20485.