• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间异质性可导致 COVID-19 发病时间和严重程度的显著局部变化。

Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.

Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24180-24187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011656117. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2011656117
PMID:32913057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7533653/
Abstract

Standard epidemiological models for COVID-19 employ variants of compartment (SIR or susceptible-infectious-recovered) models at local scales, implicitly assuming spatially uniform local mixing. Here, we examine the effect of employing more geographically detailed diffusion models based on known spatial features of interpersonal networks, most particularly the presence of a long-tailed but monotone decline in the probability of interaction with distance, on disease diffusion. Based on simulations of unrestricted COVID-19 diffusion in 19 US cities, we conclude that heterogeneity in population distribution can have large impacts on local pandemic timing and severity, even when aggregate behavior at larger scales mirrors a classic SIR-like pattern. Impacts observed include severe local outbreaks with long lag time relative to the aggregate infection curve, and the presence of numerous areas whose disease trajectories correlate poorly with those of neighboring areas. A simple catchment model for hospital demand illustrates potential implications for health care utilization, with substantial disparities in the timing and extremity of impacts even without distancing interventions. Likewise, analysis of social exposure to others who are morbid or deceased shows considerable variation in how the epidemic can appear to individuals on the ground, potentially affecting risk assessment and compliance with mitigation measures. These results demonstrate the potential for spatial network structure to generate highly nonuniform diffusion behavior even at the scale of cities, and suggest the importance of incorporating such structure when designing models to inform health care planning, predict community outcomes, or identify potential disparities.

摘要

标准的 COVID-19 流行病学模型在局部尺度上采用了变体隔间 (SIR 或易感-感染-恢复) 模型,隐含地假设了局部混合的空间均匀性。在这里,我们研究了采用更具地理细节的扩散模型的效果,这些模型基于人际网络的已知空间特征,特别是存在与距离相关的交互概率呈长尾但单调下降的特征,对疾病传播的影响。基于对 19 个美国城市 COVID-19 无限制扩散的模拟,我们得出结论,人口分布的异质性即使在更大规模上的总体行为反映出经典的 SIR 样模式时,也会对当地大流行的时间和严重程度产生重大影响。观察到的影响包括与总感染曲线相比具有长滞后时间的局部严重爆发,以及存在许多与相邻地区疾病轨迹相关性较差的地区。医院需求的简单集水区模型说明了对医疗保健利用的潜在影响,即使没有距离干预,影响的时间和程度也存在很大差异。同样,对与患病或死亡的他人的社会接触的分析表明,在大流行对地面上的个人的表现方面存在相当大的差异,这可能会影响风险评估和对缓解措施的遵守。这些结果表明,即使在城市规模上,空间网络结构也有可能产生高度不均匀的扩散行为,并表明在设计模型以提供医疗保健规划、预测社区结果或识别潜在差异时,纳入这种结构的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/e960a943d8fb/pnas.2011656117fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/6f086c9c636f/pnas.2011656117fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/edbcc3eda12a/pnas.2011656117fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/d327699753a0/pnas.2011656117fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/61b573f6ab91/pnas.2011656117fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/fb142ebdf284/pnas.2011656117fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/e960a943d8fb/pnas.2011656117fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/6f086c9c636f/pnas.2011656117fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/edbcc3eda12a/pnas.2011656117fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/d327699753a0/pnas.2011656117fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/61b573f6ab91/pnas.2011656117fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/fb142ebdf284/pnas.2011656117fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/7533653/e960a943d8fb/pnas.2011656117fig06.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity.空间异质性可导致 COVID-19 发病时间和严重程度的显著局部变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24180-24187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011656117. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.自行采取预防措施和短期政府实施社会隔离对减轻和延缓 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
The 5% of the Population at High Risk for Severe COVID-19 Infection Is Identifiable and Needs to Be Taken Into Account When Reopening the Economy.新冠病毒严重感染高风险的5%人群是可识别的,在经济重启时需要予以考虑。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 May;26(3):219-227. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000475.
4
Local lockdowns outperform global lockdown on the far side of the COVID-19 epidemic curve.局部封锁在新冠疫情曲线的远端优于全球封锁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24575-24580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014385117. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Disease spreading with social distancing: A prevention strategy in disordered multiplex networks.社交距离下的疾病传播:无序复网络中的预防策略。
Phys Rev E. 2020 Aug;102(2-1):022310. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.022310.
6
Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study.美国移动模式与 COVID-19 传播的关联:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Flexible, Freely Available Stochastic Individual Contact Model for Exploring COVID-19 Intervention and Control Strategies: Development and Simulation.用于探索 COVID-19 干预和控制策略的灵活、免费的随机个体接触模型:开发和模拟。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 18;6(3):e18965. doi: 10.2196/18965.
8
Demographic, jurisdictional, and spatial effects on social distancing in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间人口统计学、司法管辖区和空间对社交距离的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 22;15(9):e0239572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239572. eCollection 2020.
9
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Distancing Interventions to Delay or Flatten the Epidemic Curve of Coronavirus Disease.评估社交隔离干预措施在延迟或拉平冠状病毒病流行曲线方面的效果。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;26(8):1740-1748. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201093. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Effects of Proactive Social Distancing on COVID-19 Outbreaks in 58 Cities, China.中国 58 个城市积极主动的社交距离措施对 COVID-19 疫情爆发的影响。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):2267-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201932. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Endogenous competition and the underrealized reproduction of infectious diseases.内源性竞争与传染病未充分实现的传播
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2502676122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2502676122. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Unveiling the social fabric through a temporal, nation-scale social network and its characteristics.通过一个时间跨度上的全国规模社交网络及其特征揭示社会结构。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;15(1):18383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98072-2.
3
Spatio-temporal forecasting of COVID-19 cases in the Netherlands for source and contact tracing.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of weather-related social distancing on city-scale transmission of respiratory viruses: a retrospective cohort study.天气相关社交隔离对呼吸道病毒城市尺度传播的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06028-4.
2
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance - United States, January 22-May 30, 2020.2019 年冠状病毒病病例监测-美国,2020 年 1 月 22 日-5 月 30 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 19;69(24):759-765. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2.
3
Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world.
荷兰新冠病毒疾病病例的时空预测,用于源头追踪和接触者追踪。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 May 7;10(1):2703. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2703. eCollection 2025.
4
Fine-grained forecasting of COVID-19 trends at the county level in the United States.美国县级层面新冠疫情趋势的细粒度预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 11;8(1):204. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01606-1.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Risk of New Chronic Conditions: Insights from a Longitudinal Population-Based Study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染与新发慢性病风险:一项基于人群的纵向研究的见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 26;22(2):166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020166.
6
Bias in mobility datasets drives divergence in modeled outbreak dynamics.移动性数据集中的偏差导致模型化疫情动态的差异。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jan 7;5(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00714-5.
7
Unveiling pandemic patterns: a detailed analysis of transmission and severity parameters across four COVID-19 waves in Bogotá, Colombia.揭示疫情模式:对哥伦比亚波哥大新冠疫情四波期间传播和严重程度参数的详细分析。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 10;2(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00105-x.
8
On the friendship paradox and inversity: A network property with applications to privacy-sensitive network interventions.论友谊悖论与逆悖论:一种具有隐私敏感型网络干预应用的网络属性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2306412121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306412121. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
9
Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 variants and vaccination on the time-varying reproduction number: statistical methods.分析 COVID-19 变异株和疫苗接种对时变繁殖数的影响:统计方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;12:1353441. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353441. eCollection 2024.
10
Environmental and geographical factors influencing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 over 2 years: a fine-scale spatiotemporal analysis.环境和地理因素对 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响超过 2 年:精细时空分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 18;12:1298177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1298177. eCollection 2024.
基于社交网络的隔离策略,以在封锁后世界中拉平 COVID-19 曲线。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):588-596. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Pathophysiological characteristics and therapeutic approaches for pulmonary injury and cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病 2019 的肺损伤和心血管并发症的病理生理特征和治疗方法。
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2020 Jul-Aug;47:107228. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2020.107228. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19.人口科学有助于了解 COVID-19 的传播和死亡率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 5;117(18):9696-9698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004911117. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.意大利新冠肺炎死亡患者的病死率及特征
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
7
Review of the Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的临床特征综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1545-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05762-w. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Suburbanization and Segregation in the United States: 1970-2010.美国的郊区化与隔离:1970 - 2010年
Ethn Racial Stud. 2018;41(9):1594-1611. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1312010. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities.美国 50 个最大城市的城市流动性和社区隔离。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 24;115(30):7735-7740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802537115. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Predicting Regional Self-identification from Spatial Network Models.从空间网络模型预测区域自我认同。
Geogr Anal. 2015 Jan;47(1):50-72. doi: 10.1111/gean.12045.