• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 障碍定式临床访谈量表-临床版(SCID-5-CV)的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).

机构信息

Mental Health Research Center, Mood Disorders Research Group, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Clinical Psychology Department, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Psychiatry Institute), Mental Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2021 May;11(5):e01894. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1894. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.1894
PMID:33729681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8119811/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of Structured Clinical Interview Version for DSM-5 (R) Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV) in a population of patients with psychiatric disorders in Tehran.

METHOD

The study population included all outpatients and inpatients referred to three psychiatric centers in Tehran, namely Iran Psychiatric Hospital, Rasoul Akram Hospital, and Clinic of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Psychiatric Institute). Inclusion criteria included age between 16 and 70 years, informed consent to study, ability to understand and speak Persian, and no specific physical problems that interfere with the conduct of the interview. Also, exclusion criteria included inability to communicate, mental retardation or dementia, severe symptoms of acute psychosis, and severe restlessness. In addition to demographic questionnaire, Persian version of SCID-5-CV was used in this study. Finally, diagnostic validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were used to evaluate the information.

RESULTS

In terms of the kappa criterion, for all diagnoses except for anxiety disorders, kappa was above 0.4 as a result of agreement above average, but in anxiety disorders with kappa 0.34 there was a moderate agreement between psychiatrist and SCID interviewer reports. Also, according to the psychiatrist's diagnosis as the gold standard, in most diagnoses, except for anxiety disorders, kappa was higher than 0.80, indicating the desirable characteristic of this tool in the diagnosis of disorders. Sensitivity of all diagnoses was higher than 0.80.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of the present study, SCID-5-CV can be used for diagnostic purposes in psychiatric clinics and hospitals and to evaluate the treatment process of patients. In general, this version is suitable especially the schizophrenia spectrum and other psychiatric disorders; however, using SCID-5-CV for anxiety-related disorders should be done with caution.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 DSM-5 临床定式访谈版(SCID-5-CV)在德黑兰精神障碍患者人群中的心理测量特性。

方法

研究人群包括所有转诊至德黑兰三家精神病中心的门诊和住院患者,即伊朗精神病院、拉索尔阿克拉姆医院和行为科学与心理健康诊所(德黑兰心理研究所)。纳入标准包括年龄在 16 至 70 岁之间、同意参加研究、能够理解和讲波斯语、以及没有具体的身体问题干扰访谈进行。此外,排除标准包括无法沟通、智力障碍或痴呆、严重的急性精神病症状和严重的不安。除了人口统计学问卷外,本研究还使用了波斯语版的 SCID-5-CV。最后,使用诊断有效性、测试重测信度和评分者间信度来评估信息。

结果

根据kappa 标准,除了焦虑障碍外,所有诊断的kappa 值均高于 0.4,表明两者之间的一致性高于平均水平,但在焦虑障碍中kappa 值为 0.34,表明精神科医生和 SCID 访谈员报告之间存在中度一致性。此外,根据精神科医生的诊断作为金标准,除了焦虑障碍外,大多数诊断的kappa 值均高于 0.80,表明该工具在诊断障碍方面具有理想的特征。所有诊断的敏感性均高于 0.80。

结论

根据本研究的结果,SCID-5-CV 可用于精神病诊所和医院的诊断目的,并评估患者的治疗过程。总的来说,该版本特别适用于精神分裂症谱系和其他精神障碍;然而,在评估与焦虑相关的障碍时,应谨慎使用 SCID-5-CV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7398/8119811/f9bae7e76158/BRB3-11-e01894-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7398/8119811/f9bae7e76158/BRB3-11-e01894-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7398/8119811/f9bae7e76158/BRB3-11-e01894-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).DSM-5 障碍定式临床访谈量表-临床版(SCID-5-CV)的心理测量特性。
Brain Behav. 2021 May;11(5):e01894. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1894. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Clinical validity and intrarater and test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).DSM-5 临床定式访谈 - 临床版(SCID-5-CV)的临床有效性以及评定者内信度和重测信度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;73(12):754-760. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12931. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍结构化临床访谈的波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;32(4):95-99. doi: 10.12809/eaap2208.
4
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
5
Persian Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and its Psychometric Properties.《Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 的波斯语翻译与文化调适及其心理计量特性》。
Arch Iran Med. 2022 May 1;25(5):294-299. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.48.
6
The psychometric properties of the of the Persian version of the Screen for adult anxiety related disorders (SCAARED) in patients with anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍患者的成人焦虑相关障碍筛查表(SCAARED)波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;12(7):e2647. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2647. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
A Persian translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition: psychometric properties.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈的波斯语翻译:心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Feb;50(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
8
[Adaptation and Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Disorders - Clinician Version (SCID-5/CV) to the Turkish Language].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版障碍的结构化临床访谈-临床医生版(SCID-5/CV)的土耳其语改编与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Spring;30(1):51-56.
9
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
10
Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID).使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)结构临床访谈(SCID)评估的精神病理学严重程度维度的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1590. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot randomized trial comparing face-to-face and internet-based unified transdiagnostic treatment for adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders in Iran.一项在伊朗进行的针对患有焦虑症和抑郁症青少年的面对面与基于互联网的统一跨诊断治疗比较的试点随机试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 18;16:1500214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1500214. eCollection 2025.
2
Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring in First Episode Psychosis: Mixed-Methods Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.首发精神病中基于智能手机的自我监测:参与障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 26;27:e71989. doi: 10.2196/71989.
3
Exploring the impact of self-efficacy on glycemic control in Omani type 2 diabetes patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID).使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)结构临床访谈(SCID)评估的精神病理学严重程度维度的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1590. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Psychometric Properties of a Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-5 Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.DSM-5 焦虑、心境、强迫症及相关障碍的结构化诊断访谈的心理测量学特性。
Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1073191116638410. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II).
探索自我效能对阿曼2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 25;16:1597274. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1597274. eCollection 2025.
4
Neuropsychiatric symptoms cluster as primary drivers of Long COVID complexity: a South Texas retrospective cohort study.神经精神症状群是长期新冠复杂性的主要驱动因素:一项南德克萨斯回顾性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1612489. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1612489. eCollection 2025.
5
Manifestation and Measurement of Atypical Depression: A Scoping Review.非典型抑郁症的表现与测量:一项范围综述
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70123. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70123.
6
Memory Function in Euthymic Patients with Bipolar I Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical and Demographic Correlates.双相I型障碍心境正常患者的记忆功能:临床及人口统计学相关因素的横断面研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025 Mar 6;39:36. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.39.36. eCollection 2025.
7
Strengthening care in collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis in Uganda (SCAPE-U): A protocol for a cluster randomized controlled feasibility trial.乌干达与有精神病生活经历者合作加强护理(SCAPE-U):一项整群随机对照可行性试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 21;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01684-8.
8
Interactive effect of BDNF rs10835210 polymorphism and childhood maltreatment on cognitive functioning in Chinese male patients with methamphetamine use disorder.脑源性神经营养因子基因rs10835210多态性与童年期虐待对中国男性甲基苯丙胺使用障碍患者认知功能的交互作用
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02038-4.
9
Enhancing early detection and treatment of psychosis in Germany: a protocol for the health economic evaluation of an artificial intelligence-guided complex intervention.加强德国精神病的早期检测与治疗:一项关于人工智能引导的复杂干预措施的卫生经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e103151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103151.
10
Prevalence of Past-Year Mental and Substance Use Disorders, 2021-2022.2021 - 2022年过去一年精神和物质使用障碍的患病率
Psychiatr Serv. 2025 Aug 1;76(8):720-728. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240329. Epub 2025 May 21.
DSM-IV 轴 I 障碍(SCID I)和轴 II 障碍(SCID II)的结构性临床访谈的评定者间信度。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):75-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.693.
4
A Persian translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition: psychometric properties.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈的波斯语翻译:心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Feb;50(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
5
Diagnosing comorbid psychiatric disorders in substance abusers: validity of the Spanish versions of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.诊断药物滥用者的共病精神障碍:《物质与精神障碍精神科研究访谈》和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈西班牙语版本的效度
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1231-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1231.
6
Attainment and maintenance of reliability of axis I and II disorders over the course of a longitudinal study.在一项纵向研究过程中轴I和轴II障碍的可靠性的获得与维持。
Compr Psychiatry. 2001 Sep-Oct;42(5):369-74. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.24556.
7
The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.协作性纵向人格障碍研究:轴I和轴II诊断的可靠性
J Pers Disord. 2000 Winter;14(4):291-9. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291.
8
Inter-rater reliability of the SCID alcohol and substance use disorders section among adolescents.青少年中SCID酒精与物质使用障碍部分的评分者间信度。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 May 1;59(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00119-2.
9
A comparison of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R and clinical diagnoses.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本结构化临床访谈与临床诊断的比较
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1995 Jun;183(6):365-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199506000-00003.
10
High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本轴I障碍用结构化临床访谈(SCID-I)具有较高的评定者间信度。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Aug;84(2):167-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03123.x.