• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人急诊住院后的临床决策。风险分层评分的推导和验证:OPERA。

Clinical decision-making in older adults following emergency admission to hospital. Derivation and validation of a risk stratification score: OPERA.

机构信息

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248477. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248477
PMID:33735316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7971558/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Demographic changes alongside medical advances have resulted in older adults accounting for an increasing proportion of emergency hospital admissions. Current measures of illness severity, limited to physiological parameters, have shortcomings in this cohort, partly due to patient complexity. This study aimed to derive and validate a risk score for acutely unwell older adults which may enhance risk stratification and support clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Data was collected from emergency admissions in patients ≥65 years from two UK general hospitals (April 2017- April 2018). Variables underwent regression analysis for in-hospital mortality and independent predictors were used to create a risk score. Performance was assessed on external validation. Secondary outcomes included seven-day mortality and extended hospital stay.

RESULTS

Derivation (n = 8,974) and validation (n = 8,391) cohorts were analysed. The model included the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), clinical frailty scale (CFS), acute kidney injury, age, sex, and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool. For mortality, area under the curve for the model was 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.80), superior to NEWS2 0.65 (0.62-0.67) and CFS 0.76 (0.74-0.77) (P<0.0001). Risk groups predicted prolonged hospital stay: the highest risk group had an odds ratio of 9.7 (5.8-16.1) to stay >30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our simple validated model (Older Persons' Emergency Risk Assessment [OPERA] score) predicts in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay and could be easily integrated into electronic hospital systems, enabling automatic digital generation of risk stratification within hours of admission. Future studies may validate the OPERA score in external populations and consider an impact analysis.

摘要

研究目的

人口结构变化和医学进步导致老年患者在急诊入院患者中的比例不断增加。目前的疾病严重程度评估方法仅限于生理参数,在这一人群中存在缺陷,部分原因是患者病情复杂。本研究旨在为病情急危的老年患者开发和验证一种风险评分,以增强风险分层,并为临床决策提供支持。

研究方法

本研究的数据来自于 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 4 月期间英国两家综合医院的老年(≥65 岁)急诊入院患者。对入院患者的变量进行回归分析,确定院内死亡率的独立预测因素,并据此建立风险评分。通过外部验证评估其性能。次要结局包括 7 天死亡率和延长住院时间。

研究结果

对 8974 名患者进行了推导,对 8391 名患者进行了验证。该模型纳入了国家早期预警评分 2(NEWS2)、临床虚弱量表(CFS)、急性肾损伤、年龄、性别和营养不良通用筛查工具。对于死亡率,该模型的曲线下面积为 0.79(95%CI 0.78-0.80),优于 NEWS2 的 0.65(0.62-0.67)和 CFS 的 0.76(0.74-0.77)(P<0.0001)。风险组预测延长住院时间:风险最高的组住院时间超过 30 天的比值比为 9.7(5.8-16.1)。

研究结论

我们的验证后的简单模型(老年人急诊风险评估[OPERA]评分)可以预测院内死亡率和延长住院时间,并且可以很容易地整合到电子医院系统中,在入院数小时内自动生成风险分层。未来的研究可能会在外部人群中验证 OPERA 评分,并考虑进行影响分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/0bc9326970e2/pone.0248477.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/ed346bb77a53/pone.0248477.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/e978a864edcd/pone.0248477.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/0bc9326970e2/pone.0248477.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/ed346bb77a53/pone.0248477.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/e978a864edcd/pone.0248477.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5309/7971558/0bc9326970e2/pone.0248477.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical decision-making in older adults following emergency admission to hospital. Derivation and validation of a risk stratification score: OPERA.老年人急诊住院后的临床决策。风险分层评分的推导和验证:OPERA。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248477. eCollection 2021.
2
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 - a prospective cohort study.入院时的国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)可预测新冠病毒疾病的严重程度和住院死亡率-一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 13;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3.
3
Development and validation of a novel computer-aided score to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for acutely ill medical admissions in two acute hospitals using their first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs: a cross-sectional study.开发和验证一种新的计算机辅助评分,以预测两家急症医院使用首次电子记录的血液检查结果和生命体征的急性入院患者住院期间死亡风险:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 6;8(12):e022939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022939.
4
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and 3-level triage scale as risk predictors in frail older adults in the emergency department.国家早期预警评分 2 版(NEWS2)和 3 级分诊量表在急诊科虚弱老年人中的风险预测作用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00379-y.
5
Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study.老年急诊剖腹手术患者的脆弱性:来自英国观察性急诊剖腹手术和脆弱性(ELF)研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.
6
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia.用于预测急诊科处置情况的悉尼分诊至入院风险工具(START):一项使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州全州范围回顾性数据的推导与内部验证研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4.
7
Is Frailty a Predictor of Outcomes in Elderly Inpatients with Acute Kidney Injury? A Prospective Cohort Study.衰弱是否可预测老年急性肾损伤住院患者的结局?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Med. 2018 Oct;131(10):1251-1256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
8
Evaluation and improvement of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for COVID-19: a multi-hospital study.评估和改进 COVID-19 的国家早期预警评分(NEWS2):一项多医院研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01893-3.
9
Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).预测急诊入院患者的急性肾损伤:急性肾损伤预测评分(APS)的外部验证研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 8;7(3):e013511. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013511.
10
Frailty status among older critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury.老年重症急性肾损伤患者的虚弱状况。
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 25;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03510-y.

引用本文的文献

1
What can we learn from 68 000 clinical frailty scale scores? Evaluating the utility of frailty assessment in emergency departments.从68000份临床衰弱量表评分中我们能学到什么?评估急诊科衰弱评估的效用。
Age Ageing. 2025 Mar 28;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf093.
2
Acute Kidney Injury Following Posaconazole for Mucormycosis: SARS-CoV-2 as a Back-Seat Driver.泊沙康唑治疗毛霉菌病后发生急性肾损伤:新型冠状病毒作为幕后推手
Cureus. 2022 Jul 19;14(7):e27018. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27018. eCollection 2022 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale.临床虚弱量表的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.
2
Evaluating the impact of prediction models: lessons learned, challenges, and recommendations.评估预测模型的影响:经验教训、挑战及建议。
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Jun 12;2:11. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0033-6. eCollection 2018.
3
Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study.
开发和验证一个专注于急性护理环境中老年人的医院衰弱风险评分,使用电子医院记录:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30668-8. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Development and External Validation of an Automated Computer-Aided Risk Score for Predicting Sepsis in Emergency Medical Admissions Using the Patient's First Electronically Recorded Vital Signs and Blood Test Results.开发并验证一种基于患者首次电子记录的生命体征和血液检查结果的自动计算机辅助风险评分,用于预测急诊入院患者发生脓毒症的风险。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):612-618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002967.
5
The most commonly used disease severity scores are inappropriate for risk stratification of older emergency department sepsis patients: an observational multi-centre study.最常用的疾病严重程度评分不适用于老年急诊科脓毒症患者的风险分层:一项观察性多中心研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 11;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0436-3.
6
Using routine blood test results to predict the risk of death for emergency medical admissions to hospital: an external model validation study.利用常规血液检测结果预测医院急诊入院死亡风险:一项外部模型验证研究。
QJM. 2017 Jan;110(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw110. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
The clinical frailty scale predicts functional decline and mortality when used by junior medical staff: a prospective cohort study.初级医务人员使用临床衰弱量表可预测功能衰退和死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jun 2;16:117. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0292-4.
8
Regression coefficient-based scoring system should be used to assign weights to the risk index.基于回归系数的评分系统应被用于为风险指数赋权。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Developing and validating a risk prediction model for acute care based on frailty syndromes.基于衰弱综合征开发并验证急性护理风险预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 21;5(10):e008457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008457.
10
Estimating the effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU utilization: a systematic review.评估姑息治疗干预措施和预立医疗计划对重症监护病房(ICU)使用情况的影响:一项系统评价
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1102-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000852.