• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在封锁期间通过五个英国国家纵向研究中的 COVID-19 调查获取健康和医疗服务的情况。

Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e045813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045813.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045813
PMID:33737441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7978270/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Access to health services and adequate care is influenced by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic position (SEP) and the burden of comorbidities. Our study aimed to assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic further deepened these already existing health inequalities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Data were collected from five longitudinal age-homogenous British cohorts (born in 2000-2002, 1989-1990, 1970, 1958 and 1946).

PARTICIPANTS

A web survey was sent to the cohorts. Anybody who responded to the survey was included, resulting in 14 891 eligible participants.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED

The survey provided data on cancelled surgical or medical appointments, and the number of care hours received in a week during the first UK COVID-19 national lockdown.

INTERVENTIONS

Using binary or ordered logistic regression, we evaluated whether these outcomes differed by sex, ethnicity, SEP and having a chronic illness. Adjustment was made for study design, non-response weights, psychological distress, presence of children or adolescents in the household, COVID-19 infection, key worker status, and whether participants had received a shielding letter. Meta-analyses were performed across the cohorts, and meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of age as a moderator.

RESULTS

Women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55) and those with a chronic illness (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.05) experienced significantly more cancellations during lockdown (all p<0.0001). Ethnic minorities and those with a chronic illness required a higher number of care hours during the lockdown (both OR≈2.00, all p<0.002). SEP was not associated with cancellation or care hours. Age was not independently associated with either outcome in the meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

The UK government's lockdown approach during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have deepened existing health inequalities, impacting predominantly women, ethnic minorities and those with chronic illnesses. Public health authorities need to implement urgent policies to ensure equitable access to health and care for all in preparation for a fourthwave.

摘要

目的

卫生服务的获取和充分的护理受到性别、种族、社会经济地位(SEP)和合并症负担的影响。我们的研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行是否进一步加深了这些已经存在的健康不平等。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

数据来自五个纵向年龄一致的英国队列(出生于 2000-2002 年、1989-1990 年、1970 年、1958 年和 1946 年)。

参与者

向队列发送了网络调查。任何对调查做出回应的人都被包括在内,共有 14891 名合格参与者。

主要观察结果

调查提供了关于取消手术或医疗预约以及在英国第一次 COVID-19 全国封锁期间每周接受护理小时数的数据。

干预措施

使用二项或有序逻辑回归,我们评估了这些结果是否因性别、种族、SEP 和患有慢性疾病而有所不同。调整了研究设计、无应答权重、心理困扰、家庭中是否有儿童或青少年、COVID-19 感染、关键工人身份以及参与者是否收到了屏蔽信。对队列进行了荟萃分析,并使用元回归评估了年龄作为调节因素的影响。

结果

女性(OR 1.40,95%CI 1.27 至 1.55)和患有慢性疾病的人(OR 1.84,95%CI 1.65 至 2.05)在封锁期间经历了更多的取消(均 p<0.0001)。少数民族和患有慢性疾病的人在封锁期间需要更多的护理小时数(两者的 OR≈2.00,均 p<0.002)。SEP 与取消或护理小时数无关。年龄在元回归中与这两个结果均无关。

结论

英国政府在 COVID-19 大流行期间的封锁措施似乎加深了现有的健康不平等,主要影响女性、少数民族和患有慢性疾病的人。公共卫生当局需要实施紧急政策,确保所有人都能公平地获得卫生和护理,为第四波疫情做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602b/7978270/609f9f8b78bb/bmjopen-2020-045813f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602b/7978270/82bba6ac14cd/bmjopen-2020-045813f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602b/7978270/609f9f8b78bb/bmjopen-2020-045813f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602b/7978270/82bba6ac14cd/bmjopen-2020-045813f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602b/7978270/609f9f8b78bb/bmjopen-2020-045813f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies.评估在封锁期间通过五个英国国家纵向研究中的 COVID-19 调查获取健康和医疗服务的情况。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e045813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045813.
2
Impact of lockdown on key workers: findings from the COVID-19 survey in four UK national longitudinal studies.封锁对关键工人的影响:四项英国全国纵向研究中 COVID-19 调查的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Oct;75(10):955-962. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215889. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies.基于 11 项纵向研究的协调分析,英国成年人在 COVID-19 大流行前后的心理困扰。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7629.
5
The Impact of First UK-Wide Lockdown (March-June 2020) on Sexual Behaviors in Men and Gender Diverse People Who Have Sex with Men During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.《2020 年 3 月至 6 月英国首次全国封锁对 COVID-19 大流行期间男男性行为人群性行为的影响:一项横断面调查》。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Feb;52(2):617-627. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02458-6. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Changes in the behavioural determinants of health during the COVID-19 pandemic: gender, socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in five British cohort studies.新冠疫情期间健康行为决定因素的变化:五个英国队列研究中的性别、社会经济和种族不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Dec;75(12):1136-1142. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215664. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
Association of Human Mobility Restrictions and Race/Ethnicity-Based, Sex-Based, and Income-Based Factors With Inequities in Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国在新冠大流行期间,人类活动限制以及基于种族/民族、性别和收入因素与幸福感不平等之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7373.
8
'Stay at home …': exploring the impact of the COVID-19 public health response on sexual behaviour and health service use among men who have sex with men: findings from a large online survey in the UK.“待在家中……”:探究新冠疫情公共卫生应对措施对男男性行为者性行为和卫生服务利用的影响:来自英国大型在线调查的研究结果。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Aug;98(5):346-352. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055039. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Shielding, hospital admission and mortality among 1216 people with total laryngectomy in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey from the first national lockdown.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,英国对 1216 名全喉切除术患者的屏蔽、住院和死亡率进行的横断面调查:来自第一次全国封锁的研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Sep;56(5):1064-1073. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12656. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Social inequalities in medical appointment cancellations and reschedulings at the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.法国新冠疫情初期医疗预约取消和重新安排中的社会不平等现象。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):652-659. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae101.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal study examining determinants of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in regional referral hospitals across Uganda.一项纵向研究,考察乌干达各地转诊医院在新冠疫情期间基本医疗服务的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 28;15(1):31706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15934-5.
2
End-of-life dementia care: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of minority ethnic and economically disadvantaged groups.临终痴呆护理:对少数族裔和经济弱势群体的经历与看法的定性研究
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf168.
3
COVID-19 and domiciliary care utilisation: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in the behavioural determinants of health during the COVID-19 pandemic: gender, socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in five British cohort studies.新冠疫情期间健康行为决定因素的变化:五个英国队列研究中的性别、社会经济和种族不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Dec;75(12):1136-1142. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215664. Epub 2021 May 26.
2
Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19中的种族与临床结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Dec;29:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100630. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study.
新冠病毒肺炎与居家护理利用情况:来自英国老年纵向研究的证据
J Econ Ageing. 2025 Jun;31:100552. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2025.100552.
4
The GP's a stranger: an interpretive phenomenological analysis exploring patient experiences of changed access to primary care in the management of long-term conditions.全科医生是个陌生人:一项诠释现象学分析,探究患者在长期疾病管理中获得初级医疗服务途径改变的体验。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Apr 29;5:1473680. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1473680. eCollection 2025.
5
Long term mortality trends in people with severe mental illnesses and how COVID-19, ethnicity and other chronic mental health comorbidities contributed: a retrospective cohort study.严重精神疾病患者的长期死亡率趋势以及新冠疫情、种族和其他慢性精神健康合并症如何产生影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 21;54(13):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001843.
6
Evaluating Ocular Healthcare Accessibility and the Severity of Emergencies during Times of Crisis.评估危机时期的眼部医疗可及性和紧急情况的严重程度。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 7;13(19):5962. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195962.
7
COVID-19's impact on hospital stays, mortality, and readmissions for poverty-related diseases, noncommunicable diseases, and injury groups in Thailand.COVID-19 对泰国与贫困相关疾病、非传染性疾病和伤害群体的住院时间、死亡率和再入院率的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0310090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310090. eCollection 2024.
8
Social inequalities in medical appointment cancellations and reschedulings at the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.法国新冠疫情初期医疗预约取消和重新安排中的社会不平等现象。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):652-659. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae101.
9
Disruption of hospital care during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted socioeconomic groups differently: population based study using routine registration data.在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,医院护理的中断对不同社会经济群体产生了不同的影响:使用常规登记数据的基于人群的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10695-9.
10
Multiple disadvantages: class, social capital, and well-being of ethnic minority groups in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.多重劣势:新冠疫情期间英国少数族裔群体的阶层、社会资本与福祉
Front Sociol. 2024 Jan 18;9:1215676. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1215676. eCollection 2024.
《COVID-19 大流行对英国英格兰因诊断延误导致的癌症死亡人数的影响:一项全国性基于人群的建模研究》。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1023-1034. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Health Disparities and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in the USA.美国的健康差异与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2431-2432. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05916-w. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.
6
COVID-19 and Health Disparities: the Reality of "the Great Equalizer".新冠疫情与健康差异:“伟大平等izer”的现实。 (注:这里原文中“Equalizer”可能有误,推测可能是“Equalizer”想表达“equalizer”即“均衡器、平等化因素”等意思,结合语境这里大概想表达新冠疫情本应是消除健康差异的平等化因素,但实际却出现了问题展现出了健康差异等意思,不过按要求严格翻译就是上述译文。)
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2439-2440. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05880-5. Epub 2020 May 14.
7
COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies.新冠疫情与数字不平等:相互影响及缓解策略
Comput Human Behav. 2020 Oct;111:106424. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Predicting admission to long-term care and mortality among community-based, dependent older people in Ireland.预测爱尔兰社区中依赖型老年人的长期护理入院和死亡率。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;34(7):999-1007. doi: 10.1002/gps.5101. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Frailty syndrome: implications and challenges for health care policy.衰弱综合征:对医疗保健政策的影响与挑战
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb 14;12:23-30. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S168750. eCollection 2019.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood and adolescent body-mass index, weight, and height from 1953 to 2015: an analysis of four longitudinal, observational, British birth cohort studies.1953 年至 2015 年期间儿童和青少年身体质量指数、体重和身高的社会经济不平等:四项英国纵向观察性出生队列研究的分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Apr;3(4):e194-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30045-8. Epub 2018 Mar 21.