Suppr超能文献

如何进行负责任的研究:研究生指南。

How to Conduct Responsible Research: A Guide for Graduate Students.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Medicine, Division of Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Curr Protoc. 2021 Mar;1(3):e87. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.87.

Abstract

Researchers must conduct research responsibly for it to have an impact and to safeguard trust in science. Essential responsibilities of researchers include using rigorous, reproducible research methods, reporting findings in a trustworthy manner, and giving the researchers who contributed appropriate authorship credit. This "how-to" guide covers strategies and practices for doing reproducible research and being a responsible author. The article also covers how to utilize decision-making strategies when uncertain about the best way to proceed in a challenging situation. The advice focuses especially on graduate students, but is appropriate for undergraduates and experienced researchers. It begins with an overview of responsible conduct of research, research misconduct, and ethical behavior in the scientific workplace. The takeaway message is that responsible conduct of research requires a thoughtful approach to doing research in order to ensure trustworthy results and conclusions, and that researchers receive fair credit. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

摘要

研究人员必须负责任地开展研究,才能产生影响并维护对科学的信任。研究人员的基本责任包括使用严谨、可重复的研究方法,以可信赖的方式报告研究结果,并给予做出贡献的研究人员适当的作者身份认可。本“操作指南”涵盖了进行可重复研究和成为负责任的作者的策略和实践。本文还介绍了在不确定如何处理具有挑战性的情况时,如何使用决策策略。该建议特别针对研究生,但也适用于本科生和有经验的研究人员。它首先概述了负责任的研究行为、研究不端行为和科研工作场所的道德行为。核心信息是,负责任的研究行为需要认真对待研究,以确保可靠的结果和结论,并且研究人员获得公平的认可。© 2021 威立出版公司。

相似文献

4
Coercion Authorship: Ubiquitous and Preventable.胁迫署名:普遍存在且可预防。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 5;39(30):e215. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e215.

本文引用的文献

2
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
4
The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science.科学中的多样性-创新悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9284-9291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
6
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.掠夺性期刊:无定义,无辩护。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.
7
Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?性别偏见是否仍在影响科学界的女性?
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019 Jul 17;83(3). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00018-19. Print 2019 Aug 21.
8
Research integrity is much more than misconduct.研究诚信远不止于不当行为。
Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):5. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01727-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验