Suppr超能文献

“研究典范”的实验室管理实践促进研究严谨性和法规遵从性:对成功首席研究员的定性研究。

The lab management practices of "Research Exemplars" that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators.

机构信息

Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0214595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214595. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Conducting rigorous scientific inquiry within the bounds of research regulation and acceptable practice requires a principal investigator to lead and manage research processes and personnel. This study explores the practices used by investigators nominated as exemplars of research excellence and integrity to produce rigorous, reproducible research and comply with research regulations.

METHODS

Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 52 principal investigators working in the United States at top research universities and the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program. We solicited nominations of researchers meeting two criteria: (1) they are federally-funded researchers doing high-quality, high-impact research, and (2) have reputations for professionalism and integrity. Each investigator received an initial nomination addressing both criteria and at least one additional endorsement corroborating criteria 2. A panel of researchers and our research team reviewed the nominations to select finalists who were invited to participate. The cohort of "Research Exemplars" includes highly accomplished researchers in diverse scientific disciplines. The semi-structured interview questions asked them to describe the routine practices they employ to foster rigor and regulatory compliance. We used inductive thematic analysis to identify common practices.

RESULTS

The exemplars identified a core set of 8 practices and provided strategies for employing them. The practices included holding regular team meetings, encouraging shared ownership, providing supervision, ensuring adequate training, fostering positive attitudes about compliance, scrutinizing data and findings, and following standard operating procedures. Above all, the use of these practices aim to create a psychologically safe work environment in which lab members openly collaborate to scrutinize their work and share in accountability for rigorous, compliant research.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers typically receive limited systematic training in how to lead and manage their research teams. Training and education for principal investigators should include essential leadership and management practices and strategies that support doing high-quality research with integrity.

摘要

简介

在研究规定和可接受的实践范围内进行严格的科学探究,需要负责人来领导和管理研究过程和人员。本研究探讨了被提名的卓越和诚信研究典范的调查人员用来进行严谨、可重复的研究并遵守研究规定的实践。

方法

采用定性研究设计,我们采访了在美国顶尖研究型大学和美国国立卫生研究院院内研究计划工作的 52 位首席研究员。我们征集了符合两个标准的研究人员提名:(1)他们是联邦资助的研究人员,从事高质量、高影响力的研究,(2)具有专业精神和诚信的声誉。每位研究员都收到了一份最初的提名,既满足这两个标准,又至少有一个额外的认可来证实标准 2。一个研究人员小组和我们的研究团队审查了提名,以选择被邀请参与的决赛选手。“研究典范”的队列包括在不同科学领域取得卓越成就的研究人员。半结构化访谈问题要求他们描述他们用来培养严谨性和法规遵从性的常规做法。我们使用归纳主题分析来识别常见做法。

结果

典范确定了一组核心的 8 种实践,并提供了实施这些实践的策略。这些实践包括定期召开团队会议、鼓励共同拥有、提供监督、确保充分培训、培养对合规的积极态度、仔细审查数据和发现,以及遵循标准操作规程。最重要的是,这些实践的使用旨在营造一个心理安全的工作环境,使实验室成员能够公开合作,仔细审查他们的工作,并共同承担严谨、合规研究的责任。

结论

研究人员通常在如何领导和管理他们的研究团队方面接受有限的系统培训。对主要研究员的培训和教育应包括基本的领导和管理实践以及策略,以支持具有诚信的高质量研究。

相似文献

6
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

4
Biosafety, biosecurity, and bioethics.生物安全、生物安保和生物伦理。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun;42(1):137-167. doi: 10.1007/s40592-024-00204-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.关于何为良好研究文化的范围综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 14;13:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1. eCollection 2024.
8
Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.管理科学实验室中的伦理决策和角色冲突。
Account Res. 2024 Nov;31(8):1198-1221. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2236553. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
Does science have a bullying problem?科学领域存在霸凌问题吗?
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7733):616-618. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07532-5.
3
Cultivating the Human Dimension in Research.培养研究中的人文维度。
Mol Cell. 2018 Oct 18;72(2):207-210. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.015.
4
Health tips for research groups.研究团队的健康小贴士。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):302-304. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05146-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验