Suppr超能文献

多重免疫斑点法在自动化 COVID-19 血清学检测结果不一致时的应用。

Usefulness of a multiplex immunodot in case of discordant results between automated COVID-19 serological assays.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Scientific Research Pole of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2021 Jun;292:114129. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114129. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, the only reliable test for COVID-19 diagnosis is RT-qPCR. Serological assays have been widely used to increase the detection sensitivity of infected population. Hereby, we report the performance of a new pan-IgG multiplex Enzyme Immunoassay (immunodot) method for exploration of discrepant SARS-COV-2 serological results.

METHODS

A retrospective study on 38 residual serum samples from recovered COVID-19 subjects with discordant serological results on Roche and Snibe platforms, were reanalyzed on a new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay, namely COVIDOT-TEST, in order to find the source of discrepancies and to evaluate the latter method. All samples were analyzed on the BlueDiver® Instrument and all strips were read by the BlueScan® Scanner using Dr DOT® Software.

RESULTS

Based on our data, subject samples showed specific IgG reactions on ≥  2 different antigens on immunodot strips. Of these 38 samples, 97.4 % of samples showed specific IgG reaction against S1 + S2 antigens, 89.5 % showed against RBD antigen, 86.8 % against S2 antigen reaction on the COVIDOT-TEST kit. Specific IgG-S1 antigen and IgG-N antigen reactions were detected in 73.7 % and 65.8 % of the samples, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay method appeared to be a reliable assay to confirm suspicious COVID-19 serological screening results.

摘要

背景

目前,COVID-19 诊断的唯一可靠检测方法是 RT-qPCR。血清学检测已被广泛用于提高感染人群的检测灵敏度。在此,我们报告了一种新的 pan-IgG 多重酶免疫吸附测定(免疫斑点)方法用于探索 SARS-COV-2 血清学结果不一致的性能。

方法

对罗氏和新柏平台检测结果不一致的 38 例康复 COVID-19 患者的残留血清样本进行回顾性研究,在新的半自动化 pan-IgG 免疫斑点酶免疫吸附测定(COVIDOT-TEST)上重新分析,以寻找差异的来源并评估后者方法。所有样本均在 BlueDiver®仪器上进行分析,所有条带均使用 BlueScan®扫描仪和 Dr DOT®软件进行读取。

结果

根据我们的数据,受试者样本在免疫斑点条上显示出针对≥2 种不同抗原的特异性 IgG 反应。在这 38 个样本中,97.4%的样本对 S1+S2 抗原显示出特异性 IgG 反应,89.5%对 RBD 抗原,86.8%对 COVIDOT-TEST 试剂盒的 S2 抗原显示出特异性 IgG 反应。分别在 73.7%和 65.8%的样本中检测到特异性 IgG-S1 抗原和 IgG-N 抗原反应。

结论

新的半自动化 pan-IgG 免疫斑点酶免疫吸附测定方法似乎是一种可靠的方法,可用于确认可疑的 COVID-19 血清学筛查结果。

相似文献

3
Analytical characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 EURM-017 reference material.分析 SARS-CoV-2 EURM-017 参考物质的特性。
Clin Biochem. 2022 Mar;101:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.12.009. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

5
Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections.新冠病毒与 SARS 感染的血清学鉴别。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1497-1505. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951.
7
The Promise and Peril of Antibody Testing for COVID-19.新冠病毒抗体检测的前景与风险
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1881-1883. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6170.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验