• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年的感知养育方式、思维方式和性别对职业决策自我效能的影响：方式与原因？

Perceived parenting styles, thinking styles, and gender on the career decision self-efficacy of adolescents: how & why?

作者信息

Situmorang Dominikus David Biondi, Salim Rose Mini Agoes

机构信息

Department of Guidance and Counseling, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Faculty of Psychology, University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Mar 11;7(3):e06430. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06430. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06430
PMID:33748489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7966998/
Abstract

Career decision self-efficacy (CDSE), i.e., the ability to successfully make important career-related decisions, is influenced by perceived parenting styles, thinking styles, and gender. Thus, this non-experimental study examined the effects of these factors on the CDSE of 617 high school students in Jakarta, Indonesia. According to the measuring instruments (CDSE Scale-Short Form, Parental Authority Questionnaire, and Thinking and Styles Inventory-Revised II), the adolescents' CDSE was influenced by the authoritative and permissive parenting styles, and three types of thinking styles. Moreover, the thinking styles mediated the relationship between the perceived parenting styles and CDSE, while gender acted as a homologizer.

摘要

职业决策自我效能感（CDSE），即成功做出与职业相关重要决策的能力，会受到感知到的养育方式、思维方式和性别的影响。因此，这项非实验性研究考察了这些因素对印度尼西亚雅加达617名高中生职业决策自我效能感的影响。根据测量工具（职业决策自我效能量表简版、父母权威问卷和思维与风格量表修订版二），青少年的职业决策自我效能感受到权威型和放任型养育方式以及三种思维方式的影响。此外，思维方式在感知到的养育方式与职业决策自我效能感之间起中介作用，而性别起到了同质化作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/0df25ce154df/gr18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/d8e401748939/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/362f2d74f69c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/277f562ff731/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/5551947fccbd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/371fff48d3cd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/3c85d4f42afa/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/9a62bdb31662/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/ba6bf036a7e0/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/35d80d17951e/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/301668dc842e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/1f366e8bc99a/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/d215f488b020/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/c4be8a898dd5/gr13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/8e982c3f2550/gr14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/5bb9d74fb5d2/gr15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/a45f8e1e8389/gr16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/b46fadd9e37a/gr17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/0df25ce154df/gr18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/d8e401748939/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/362f2d74f69c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/277f562ff731/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/5551947fccbd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/371fff48d3cd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/3c85d4f42afa/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/9a62bdb31662/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/ba6bf036a7e0/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/35d80d17951e/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/301668dc842e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/1f366e8bc99a/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/d215f488b020/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/c4be8a898dd5/gr13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/8e982c3f2550/gr14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/5bb9d74fb5d2/gr15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/a45f8e1e8389/gr16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/b46fadd9e37a/gr17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/7966998/0df25ce154df/gr18.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived parenting styles, thinking styles, and gender on the career decision self-efficacy of adolescents: how & why?青少年的感知养育方式、思维方式和性别对职业决策自我效能的影响：方式与原因？
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 11;7(3):e06430. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06430. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Career-Specific Parenting Practices and Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Among Chinese Adolescents: The Interactive Effects of Parenting Practices and the Mediating Role of Autonomy.中国青少年特定职业的养育方式与职业决策自我效能感：养育方式的交互作用及自主性的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;10:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00363. eCollection 2019.
3
Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Adolescents' Self-Esteem.养育方式与青少年自尊之间的关系
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2019 Jan;39(2):91-99. doi: 10.1177/0272684X18811023. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
4
How Parenting Styles Link Career Decision-Making Difficulties in Chinese College Students? The Mediating Effects of Core Self-Evaluation and Career Calling.育儿方式如何与中国大学生的职业决策困难相关联？核心自我评价和职业使命感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 19;12:661600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661600. eCollection 2021.
5
Corrigendum to "Perceived parenting styles, thinking styles, and gender on the career decision self-efficacy of adolescents: how & why?" [Heliyon 7 (3) (March 2021) e06430].《“青少年的职业决策自我效能感中的感知养育方式、思维方式与性别：如何及为何？”勘误》[《Heliyon》7（3）（2021年3月）e06430]
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 16;7(4):e06791. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06791. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Relationship between parenting styles and gender role identity in college students.大学生养育方式与性别角色认同之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):250-71. doi: 10.2466/21.09.PR0.114k13w4.
7
Parenting Styles and Parent-Adolescent Relationships: The Mediating Roles of Behavioral Autonomy and Parental Authority.育儿方式与亲子关系：行为自主性和父母权威的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02187. eCollection 2018.
8
Adolescent Perceptions of Parenting Styles in Sweden, Italy and Greece: An Exploratory Study.瑞典、意大利和希腊青少年对养育方式的认知：一项探索性研究。
Eur J Psychol. 2015 May 29;11(2):244-58. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i2.887. eCollection 2015 May.
9
The relationship between parenting styles and self-esteem of medical students with age and gender as moderators.以年龄和性别作为调节变量的医学生养育方式与自尊之间的关系。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 6;86(9):5145-5151. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002432. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Perception of parenting styles by in-school adolescents in South-West Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部在校青少年对养育方式的认知
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2018 Nov 13;32(6):/j/ijamh.ahead-of-print/ijamh-2018-0023/ijamh-2018-0023.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2018-0023.

引用本文的文献

1
: Using loose parts media to develop social financial education model for early children.利用零散材料媒介为幼儿开发社会金融教育模式。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 14;9(6):e17188. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17188. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The differential item functioning (DIF) testing for the WOCC (Ways of Coping Checklist) instrument based on gender.基于性别的应对方式清单（WOCC）工具的项目功能差异（DIF）测试。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 23;9(4):e14769. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14769. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
The role of career decision self-efficacy as a mediator of peer support on students' career adaptability.

本文引用的文献

1
The issues of transference and countertransference in tele-psychotherapy during COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间远程心理治疗中的移情与反移情问题。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Dec;54:102427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102427. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
Online/Cyber Counseling Services in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Are They Really New?新冠疫情期间的在线/网络咨询服务：它们真的是新事物吗？
J Pastoral Care Counsel. 2020 Oct;74(3):166-174. doi: 10.1177/1542305020948170.
3
Perceived Parenting Styles and Values Development: A Longitudinal Study of Adolescents and Emerging Adults.
职业决策自我效能感作为同伴支持对学生职业适应性影响的中介作用。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 27;9(4):e14911. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14911. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Internet-based parenting intervention: A systematic review.基于互联网的育儿干预：一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 20;9(3):e14671. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14671. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Determinants of academic achievement: How parents and teachers influence high school students' performance.学业成绩的决定因素：父母和教师如何影响高中生的表现。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 3;9(2):e13335. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13335. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Examine the parenting style effect on the academic achievement orientation of secondary school students: The moderating role of digital literacy.审视父母教养方式对中学生学业成就取向的影响：数字素养的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1063682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063682. eCollection 2022.
7
Burnout and resilience during the COVID-19 outbreak: differences between male and female students.新冠疫情期间的职业倦怠与心理韧性：男女学生之间的差异
Heliyon. 2022 Aug;8(8):e10019. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10019. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
The influence of parenting on building character in adolescents.养育方式对青少年性格塑造的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 Apr 27;8(5):e09349. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09349. eCollection 2022 May.
感知的教养方式与价值观发展：青少年和成年初期的纵向研究。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jun;30(2):541-558. doi: 10.1111/jora.12542. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
A cultural accommodation model for cross-cultural psychotherapy: Illustrated with the case of Asian Americans.跨文化心理治疗的文化适应模式：以美籍亚裔为例。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2006 Winter;43(4):410-23. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.410.
5
Parental authority questionnaire.父母权威问卷。
J Pers Assess. 1991 Aug;57(1):110-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_13.
6
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.自我报告测量工具跨文化适应过程指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.