冠状病毒亚属内ACE2使用的进化史。
The evolutionary history of ACE2 usage within the coronavirus subgenus .
作者信息
Wells H L, Letko M, Lasso G, Ssebide B, Nziza J, Byarugaba D K, Navarrete-Macias I, Liang E, Cranfield M, Han B A, Tingley M W, Diuk-Wasser M, Goldstein T, Johnson C K, Mazet J A K, Chandran K, Munster V J, Gilardi K, Anthony S J
机构信息
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 S. 4th St, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA.
出版信息
Virus Evol. 2021 Feb 5;7(1):veab007. doi: 10.1093/ve/veab007. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and SARS-CoV-2 are not phylogenetically closely related; however, both use the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in humans for cell entry. This is not a universal sarbecovirus trait; for example, many known sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-1 have two deletions in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein that render them incapable of using human ACE2. Here, we report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda that are phylogenetically intermediate to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate via in vitro studies that they are also unable to utilize human ACE2. Furthermore, we show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives. We show that the lineage that includes SARS-CoV-2 is most likely the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and that recombination with at least one virus from this group conferred ACE2 usage to the lineage including SARS-CoV-1 at some time in the past. We argue that alternative scenarios such as convergent evolution are much less parsimonious; we show that biogeography and patterns of host tropism support the plausibility of a recombination scenario, and we propose a competitive release hypothesis to explain how this recombination event could have occurred and why it is evolutionarily advantageous. The findings provide important insights into the natural history of ACE2 usage for both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and a greater understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms that shape zoonotic potential of coronaviruses. This study also underscores the need for increased surveillance for sarbecoviruses in southwestern China, where most ACE2-using viruses have been found to date, as well as other regions such as Africa, where these viruses have only recently been discovered.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒1(SARS-CoV-1)和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)在系统发育上并非密切相关;然而,两者都利用人类的血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)受体进入细胞。这并非普遍的沙贝病毒特征;例如,许多与SARS-CoV-1相关的已知沙贝病毒在刺突蛋白的受体结合域有两个缺失,这使得它们无法利用人类ACE2。在此,我们报告了来自卢旺达和乌干达的一种新型沙贝病毒的三个序列,它们在系统发育上处于SARS-CoV-1和SARS-CoV-2之间,并通过体外研究证明它们也无法利用人类ACE2。此外,我们表明,沙贝病毒中观察到的ACE2使用模式,最好的解释不是SARS-CoV-2的重组,而是SARS-CoV-1及其亲属的重组。我们表明,包括SARS-CoV-2的谱系很可能是最初使用ACE2的谱系,并且在过去的某个时候,与该组中至少一种病毒的重组赋予了包括SARS-CoV-1的谱系使用ACE2的能力。我们认为,诸如趋同进化等其他情况则远没有这么简洁;我们表明生物地理学和宿主嗜性模式支持重组情况的合理性,并且我们提出了一个竞争释放假说,以解释这种重组事件是如何发生的以及为什么它在进化上具有优势。这些发现为SARS-CoV-1和SARS-CoV-2使用ACE2的自然历史提供了重要见解,并更深入地了解了塑造冠状病毒人畜共患病潜力的进化机制。这项研究还强调了加强对中国西南部沙贝病毒监测的必要性,迄今为止在那里发现了大多数使用ACE2的病毒,以及非洲等其他地区,这些病毒最近才在那里被发现。
相似文献
Virus Evol. 2021-2-5
bioRxiv. 2021-1-22
Front Microbiol. 2023-2-23
Cell Host Microbe. 2023-12-13
引用本文的文献
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2025-1-14
Nat Commun. 2024-10-14
PLoS Pathog. 2024-9
本文引用的文献
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020-8-21
Nature. 2020-3-30