• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 评分和炎症生物标志物在预测癌症终末期患者生存中的作用。

The role of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL scores and inflammatory biomarkers in predicting survival in terminally ill patients with cancer.

机构信息

Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, 5-Nakauchi-cho, Misasagi, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8414, Japan.

Department of Pharmacy, Tachibana Medical Corporation Higashisumiyoshi-Morimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08049-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08049-3
PMID:33757453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7988985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical use of patient-reported outcomes as compared to inflammatory biomarkers for predicting cancer survival remains a challenge in palliative care settings. We evaluated the role of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative scores (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and the inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin (Alb), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for survival prediction in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

This was an observational study in terminally ill patients with cancer hospitalized in a palliative care unit between June 2018 and December 2019. Patients' data collected at the time of hospitalization were analyzed. Cox regression was performed to examine significant factors influencing survival. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate cut-off values for predicting survival within 3 weeks, and a log-rank test was performed to compare survival curves between groups divided by the cut-off values.

RESULTS

Totally, 130 patients participated in the study. Cox regression suggested that the QLQ-C15-PAL dyspnea and fatigue scores and levels of CRP, Alb, and NLR were significantly associated with survival time, and cut-off values were 66.67, 66.67, 3.0 mg/dL, 2.5 g/dL, and 8.2, respectively. The areas under ROC curves of these variables were 0.6-0.7. There were statistically significant differences in the survival curves between groups categorized using each of these cut-off values (p < .05 for all cases).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the assessment of not only objective indicators for the systemic inflammatory response but also patient-reported outcomes using EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL is beneficial for the prediction of short-term survival in terminally ill patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

与炎症生物标志物相比,患者报告的结局在预测癌症生存方面在姑息治疗环境中的临床应用仍然是一个挑战。我们评估了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 15 项姑息治疗评分(EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL)和炎症生物标志物 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白蛋白(Alb)和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在晚期癌症患者生存预测中的作用。

方法

这是一项观察性研究,纳入了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在姑息治疗病房住院的晚期癌症终末期患者。分析了患者住院时收集的数据。使用 Cox 回归分析检查影响生存的显著因素。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以估计预测 3 周内生存的截断值,并使用对数秩检验比较按截断值划分的组之间的生存曲线。

结果

共有 130 名患者参与了这项研究。Cox 回归表明,QLQ-C15-PAL 呼吸困难和疲劳评分以及 CRP、Alb 和 NLR 水平与生存时间显著相关,截断值分别为 66.67、66.67、3.0mg/dL、2.5g/dL 和 8.2。这些变量的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.6-0.7。使用这些截断值对每个组进行分类时,生存曲线存在统计学差异(所有情况 p <.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,评估不仅包括系统炎症反应的客观指标,还包括使用 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 评估患者报告的结局,这有助于预测晚期癌症患者的短期生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60b/7988985/7a1b2642731d/12885_2021_8049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60b/7988985/7a1b2642731d/12885_2021_8049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60b/7988985/7a1b2642731d/12885_2021_8049_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL scores and inflammatory biomarkers in predicting survival in terminally ill patients with cancer.EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 评分和炎症生物标志物在预测癌症终末期患者生存中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08049-3.
2
Symptom clusters and their influence on prognosis using EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL scores in terminally ill patients with cancer.终末期癌症患者 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 评分的症状群及其对预后的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):135-143. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06380-w. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Comparison of Patient Self-Reported Quality of Life and Health Care Professional-Assessed Symptoms in Terminally ill Patients With Cancer.比较癌症终末期患者的自我报告生活质量和医疗保健专业人员评估的症状。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Mar;38(3):283-290. doi: 10.1177/1049909120944157. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life score as a prognostic indicator of survival in patients with far advanced cancer.EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 生活质量评分作为晚期癌症患者生存预后的预测指标。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jul;22(7):1941-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2173-8. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
5
Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care.验证用于评估姑息治疗患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版。
Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):889-96. doi: 10.1002/pon.1801. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
6
Cross-cultural verification of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire in mainland China.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C15-PAL问卷在中国内地的跨文化验证
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):401-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315593671. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Which symptoms and problems do advanced cancer patients admitted to specialized palliative care report in addition to those included in the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL? A register-based national study.除 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 中包含的症状和问题外,接受专科姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者还报告了哪些症状和问题?一项基于登记的全国性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1725-1735. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04976-x. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Quality of Life in a Hospice: A Validation of the Croatian Version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL.临终关怀中的生活质量:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C15-PAL克罗地亚语版本的验证
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1085-1090. doi: 10.1177/1049909118760781. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life scores in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy.EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 生活质量评分在接受姑息性放疗的晚期癌症患者中的应用。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Apr;20(4):841-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1160-6. Epub 2011 May 3.
10
Evaluating the Thresholds for Clinical Importance of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL in Patients Receiving Palliative Treatment.评估 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 在接受姑息治疗的患者中的临床重要性阈值。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;24(3):397-404. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0159. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Dyadic effects of perceived burden and psychological distress on quality of life among Chinese advanced cancer patients and their caregivers.中国晚期癌症患者及其照顾者中,感知负担与心理困扰对生活质量的二元效应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96861-3.
2
Depression, performance status, and discontinued treatment mediate an association of curability belief with prognosis in advanced cancer patients.抑郁、身体状况和治疗中断会影响可治愈信念与晚期癌症患者预后之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 24;14(1):29098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80687-6.
3
Global quality of life and mortality risk in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Patient Self-Reported Quality of Life and Health Care Professional-Assessed Symptoms in Terminally ill Patients With Cancer.比较癌症终末期患者的自我报告生活质量和医疗保健专业人员评估的症状。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Mar;38(3):283-290. doi: 10.1177/1049909120944157. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Associations between baseline symptom burden as assessed by patient-reported outcomes and overall survival of patients with metastatic cancer.基线症状负担与转移性癌症患者总体生存的相关性,该负担通过患者报告的结局来评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Mar;29(3):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05623-6. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
癌症患者的全球生活质量和死亡风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2631-2643. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03691-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Survival Prediction of Patients Who Were Terminally Ill Using the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL Scores and Laboratory Test Values.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C15-PAL评分和实验室检查值对晚期患者进行生存预测
Palliat Med Rep. 2023 Aug 1;4(1):202-207. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0015. eCollection 2023.
Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes from international randomised clinical trials on cancer: a systematic review.
癌症国际随机临床试验中患者报告结局的预后价值:系统评价。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):e685-e698. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30656-4.
4
Nutritional Laboratory Markers in Malnutrition.营养不良中的营养实验室指标
J Clin Med. 2019 May 31;8(6):775. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060775.
5
Prognostication in advanced cancer: update and directions for future research.晚期癌症的预后:更新及未来研究方向。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):1973-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04727-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
6
Can the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio be beneficial in predicting lymph node metastasis and promising prognostic markers of gastric cancer patients? Tumor maker retrospective study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值能否有助于预测胃癌患者的淋巴结转移和作为有前途的预后标志物?肿瘤标志物回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
7
The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with advanced inoperable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.全身炎症反应在预测晚期不可切除癌症患者预后中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Aug;116:134-146. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio has a prognostic value for patients with terminal cancer.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对晚期癌症患者具有预后价值。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 May 16;14:148. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0904-7.
9
Clinical Implications of C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Marker in Advanced Cancer Patients in Palliative Care Settings.C反应蛋白作为姑息治疗环境中晚期癌症患者预后标志物的临床意义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.025. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment.癌症恶病质、机制与治疗。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Apr 15;7(4):17-29. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i4.17.