Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 15;287:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Assessment of sitting has been challenging and nuances in the length of sitting are often missed.
The present study assessed total, short and prolonged sitting time, and number of breaks from sitting, and their association with anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Adults (M=59.1 years) in three studies (n=1,574) wore the activPAL accelerometer (thigh) to obtain a measure of sitting, and the Actigraph accelerometer (hip) for estimating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L (for health state and utility scores). Generalised linear modelling tested associations.
Total and prolonged sitting were associated with higher depression [total: β = 0.132 (0.010, 0.254); prolonged: β = 0.178 (0.053, 0.304)] and worse HRQoL health state scores [(total: β = -0.985 (-1.471, -0.499); prolonged: β = -0.834 (-1.301, -0.367)] and utility scores [(total: β = -0.008 (-0.012, -0.003); prolonged: β = -0.008 (-0.012, -0.004)], after controlling for covariates. MVPA was associated with better HRQoL health state and utility scores [health state: β =0.554 (0.187, 0.922); utility: β = 0.001 (0.001, 0.002)]. Total and prolonged sitting were associated with a 14% increased odds of being in the borderline/abnormal category for depression. No interactions were observed between MVPA status (active vs. inactive) and total or prolonged sitting. Anxiety was unrelated to any sitting variable.
Device-based measures of both total and prolonged sitting time were associated with depression and health-related quality of life, but not anxiety.
评估坐姿一直具有挑战性,并且坐姿的细微差别常常被忽略。
本研究评估了总坐姿时间、短时间坐姿时间和长时间坐姿时间,以及坐姿中断次数,并将其与焦虑、抑郁和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)联系起来。三项研究中的成年人(M=59.1 岁)佩戴 activPAL 加速度计(大腿)以获取坐姿测量值,并用 Actigraph 加速度计(臀部)估计中等到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表评估焦虑,使用 EQ-5D-5L(用于健康状况和效用评分)评估 HRQoL。广义线性模型检验了关联。
总坐姿时间和长时间坐姿时间与较高的抑郁水平相关[总坐姿时间:β=0.132(0.010,0.254);长时间坐姿时间:β=0.178(0.053,0.304)],以及较差的 HRQoL 健康状况评分[总坐姿时间:β=-0.985(-1.471,-0.499);长时间坐姿时间:β=-0.834(-1.301,-0.367)]和效用评分[总坐姿时间:β=-0.008(-0.012,-0.003);长时间坐姿时间:β=-0.008(-0.012,-0.004)],在控制了协变量后。MVPA 与更好的 HRQoL 健康状况和效用评分相关[健康状况:β=0.554(0.187,0.922);效用:β=0.001(0.001,0.002)]。总坐姿时间和长时间坐姿时间与抑郁处于边缘/异常类别的可能性增加 14%有关。在 MVPA 状态(活跃与不活跃)与总坐姿时间和长时间坐姿时间之间没有观察到交互作用。焦虑与任何坐姿变量都无关。
基于设备的总坐姿时间和长时间坐姿时间测量值与抑郁和健康相关生活质量相关,但与焦虑无关。