• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用机器学习算法的四种压疮预测模型中,随机森林模型具有最高的准确率。

The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

作者信息

Song Jie, Gao Yuan, Yin Pengbin, Li Yi, Li Yang, Zhang Jie, Su Qingqing, Fu Xiaojie, Pi Hongying

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Mar 18;14:1175-1187. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S297838. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S297838
PMID:33776495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7987326/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct the pressure ulcer prediction models, respectively. A total of 19 variables are included, and the importance of screening variables is evaluated. Meanwhile, the performance of the prediction models is evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The experimental results show that the four pressure ulcer prediction models all achieve good performance. Also, the AUC values of the four models are all greater than 0.95. Besides, the comparison of the four models indicates that RF model achieves a higher accuracy for the prediction of pressure ulcer.

CONCLUSION

This research verifies the feasibility of developing a management system for predicting nursing adverse event based on big data technology and machine learning technology. The random forest and decision tree model are more suitable for constructing a pressure ulcer prediction model. This study provides a reference for future pressure ulcer risk warning based on big data.

摘要

目的

构建预测压疮护理不良事件的机器学习模型,寻找能准确预测压疮发生的最优模型。

患者与方法

回顾性纳入5814例患者,其中1673例发生压疮事件。分别采用支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型构建压疮预测模型。共纳入19个变量,并评估筛选变量的重要性。同时,对预测模型的性能进行评估和比较。

结果

实验结果表明,四种压疮预测模型均取得了良好的性能。此外,四种模型的AUC值均大于0.95。此外,四种模型的比较表明,RF模型在压疮预测方面具有更高的准确性。

结论

本研究验证了基于大数据技术和机器学习技术开发护理不良事件预测管理系统的可行性。随机森林和决策树模型更适合构建压疮预测模型。本研究为未来基于大数据的压疮风险预警提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/d5fb90e82a1b/RMHP-14-1175-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/0e6b474a48a7/RMHP-14-1175-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/b24603515b10/RMHP-14-1175-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/58bdc857c7a5/RMHP-14-1175-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/d5fb90e82a1b/RMHP-14-1175-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/0e6b474a48a7/RMHP-14-1175-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/b24603515b10/RMHP-14-1175-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/58bdc857c7a5/RMHP-14-1175-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1174/7987326/d5fb90e82a1b/RMHP-14-1175-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.在使用机器学习算法的四种压疮预测模型中,随机森林模型具有最高的准确率。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Mar 18;14:1175-1187. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S297838. eCollection 2021.
2
Prediction of 5-day biochemical oxygen demand in the Buriganga River of Bangladesh using novel hybrid machine learning algorithms.利用新型混合机器学习算法预测孟加拉国布里甘加河的五日生化需氧量。
Water Environ Res. 2022 May;94(5):e10718. doi: 10.1002/wer.10718.
3
The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses.不同机器学习算法对住院患者压力性损伤的预测效果:一项网状Meta分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 2;8(11):e11361. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11361. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor.以胎儿心率作为强预测指标,用于预测体外受精-胚胎移植后早期妊娠丢失的机器学习算法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105624. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105624. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Predictive Modeling for Frailty Conditions in Elderly People: Machine Learning Approaches.老年人衰弱状况的预测建模:机器学习方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 4;8(6):e16678. doi: 10.2196/16678.
6
Application of machine learning approaches for osteoporosis risk prediction in postmenopausal women.机器学习方法在绝经后妇女骨质疏松症风险预测中的应用。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Oct 23;15(1):169. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00802-8.
7
To Establish an Early Prediction Model for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using Machine Learning Algorithm.使用机器学习算法建立重症急性胰腺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征的早期预测模型。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 21;12(5):1718. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051718.
8
Comparing different algorithms for the course of Alzheimer's disease using machine learning.使用机器学习比较阿尔茨海默病病程的不同算法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9715-9724. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2013.
9
Development and head-to-head comparison of machine-learning models to identify patients requiring prostate biopsy.开发并对头对头比较机器学习模型,以识别需要进行前列腺活检的患者。
BMC Urol. 2021 May 16;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00849-w.
10
Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.优化神经网络在医学数据集上的应用:以新生儿呼吸暂停预测为例的研究
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a decision tree model for prediction of insomnia risk among ischemic stroke convalescence patients.缺血性中风恢复期患者失眠风险预测决策树模型的开发与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2841. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24025-z.
2
Machine Learning-Guided Screening and Molecular Docking for Proposing Naturally Derived Drug Candidates Against MERS-CoV 3CL Protease.机器学习引导的筛选和分子对接,用于提出抗中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒3CL蛋白酶的天然衍生候选药物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 26;26(7):3047. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073047.
3
Electronic-Medical-Record-Driven Machine Learning Predictive Model for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: Development and External Validation.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing Inpatient Pressure Injury Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Techniques.使用机器学习技术构建住院患者压力性损伤预测模型
Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 Aug;38(8):415-423. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000604.
2
Machine Learning For Tuning, Selection, And Ensemble Of Multiple Risk Scores For Predicting Type 2 Diabetes.用于调整、选择和整合多个风险评分以预测2型糖尿病的机器学习
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Nov 5;12:189-198. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S225762. eCollection 2019.
3
Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size.
基于电子病历驱动的医院获得性压疮机器学习预测模型:开发与外部验证
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1175. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041175.
4
Developmental validation of an mRNA-cSNP profiling panel for body fluids identification and individualization.用于体液鉴定和个体化的mRNA-cSNP分析面板的发育验证。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03434-0.
5
Artificial Intelligence Methods for Diagnostic and Decision-Making Assistance in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.慢性伤口诊断与决策辅助的人工智能方法:一项系统综述
J Med Syst. 2025 Feb 19;49(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02153-8.
6
Development of Machine-learning Model to Predict Anticoagulant Use and Type in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using Coagulation Parameters.利用凝血参数开发机器学习模型以预测老年创伤性脑损伤患者的抗凝剂使用情况及类型
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Feb 15;65(2):61-70. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0066. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
7
Machine learning for urban land use/ cover mapping: Comparison of artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine, a case study of Dilla town.用于城市土地利用/覆盖制图的机器学习:人工神经网络、随机森林和支持向量机的比较——以迪拉镇为例
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 12;10(20):e39146. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39146. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
8
Machine learning predictive modeling for condemnation risk assessment in antibiotic-free raised broilers.用于无抗生素饲养肉鸡淘汰风险评估的机器学习预测模型
Poult Sci. 2024 Dec;103(12):104270. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104270. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
9
Combined analysis of the microbiome and metabolome to reveal the characteristics of saliva from different diets: a comparison among vegans, seafood-based omnivores, and red meat (beef and lamb) omnivores.微生物组和代谢组的联合分析以揭示不同饮食的唾液特征:纯素食者、以海鲜为主的杂食者和红肉(牛肉和羊肉)杂食者之间的比较。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1419686. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1419686. eCollection 2024.
10
Stacked hybridization to enhance the performance of artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of water quality index in the Bagh river basin, India.堆叠杂交以增强人工神经网络(ANN)在印度巴格河流域水质指数预测中的性能。
Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31085. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31085. eCollection 2024 May 30.
机器学习算法在有限样本量下的验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365. eCollection 2019.
4
Depression recognition using machine learning methods with different feature generation strategies.使用不同特征生成策略的机器学习方法进行抑郁识别。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Aug;99:101696. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods.基于机器学习的方法预测晚发型子痫前期的模型开发。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 23;14(8):e0221202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221202. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparison of machine learning models for seizure prediction in hospitalized patients.机器学习模型在住院患者癫痫预测中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Jul;6(7):1239-1247. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50817. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
A fine-grained Chinese word segmentation and part-of-speech tagging corpus for clinical text.一个用于临床文本的细粒度中文分词和词性标注语料库。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 9;19(Suppl 2):66. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0770-7.
8
Evaluation of Cross-Validation Strategies in Sequence-Based Binding Prediction Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的序列结合预测中交叉验证策略的评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Apr 22;59(4):1645-1657. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00663. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Machine Learning for the Prediction of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus during 5-Year Follow-up in Non-Diabetic Patients with Cardiovascular Risks.机器学习用于预测有心血管风险的非糖尿病患者5年随访期间新发糖尿病
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Feb;60(2):191-199. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.2.191.
10
Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation.压力性溃疡:病理生理学、流行病学、风险因素和表现。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Oct;81(4):881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.069. Epub 2019 Jan 18.