Sirirak Noppavut, Sangkum Premsant, Phengsalae Yada, Kongchareonsombat Wisoot, Leenanupunth Charoen, Ratanapornsompong Wattanachai, Ketsuwan Chinnakhet
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Mar 23;13:147-154. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S304221. eCollection 2021.
The Size, Topography, Obstruction, Number, and Evaluation of Hounsfield units (S.T.O.N.E.) scoring system has been proposed as a novel prognostic surgical classification for urolithiasis in predicting success rate and complications.
We carried out an externally validated S.T.O.N.E. score on rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (rURS).
The data of patients who had undergone rURS between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center were audited retrospectively. The S.T.O.N.E. score was calculated based on factors determined through preoperative computed tomography images and was analyzed in association with stone-free rate (SFR), operating time, surgical complications, and length of stay (LOS).
A total of 155 patients were included in the study with a median stone size of 10 mm (7-12) and a median S.T.O.N.E. score of 9 (8-10). The overall SFR was 89.68%. SFRs were 100.0%, 97.83%, and 77.42% in low (5), moderate (6-9), and high (10-13) score groups, respectively. The S.T.O.N.E. score ( = 0.002) and stone size ( = 0.037) were predictive factors for SFR in multivariate analysis. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the S.T.O.N.E. score and operative time, LOS, and presence of complications ( = 0.22, = 0.006; = 0.30, < 0.001; and = 0.27, < 0.001, respectively). The area under the curve of the receiving operator characteristics' curve for the S.T.O.N.E. score was 0.815.
The S.T.O.N.E. scoring system is simple and effective in predicting postoperative outcomes; therefore, this score would be a valuable tool in clinical planning for every patient who undergoes rURS.
结石大小、位置、梗阻情况、数量及亨氏单位评估(S.T.O.N.E.)评分系统已被提出,作为一种用于预测成功率和并发症的新型尿石症手术预后分类方法。
我们对硬性输尿管镜碎石术(rURS)进行了外部验证的S.T.O.N.E.评分。
回顾性分析2012年至2019年在一家三级转诊中心接受rURS治疗的患者数据。根据术前计算机断层扫描图像确定的因素计算S.T.O.N.E.评分,并与结石清除率(SFR)、手术时间、手术并发症和住院时间(LOS)进行关联分析。
本研究共纳入155例患者,结石中位大小为10mm(7 - 12),S.T.O.N.E.评分中位数为9(8 - 10)。总体SFR为89.68%。低(5分)、中(6 - 9分)、高(10 - 13分)评分组的SFR分别为100.0%、97.83%和77.42%。多因素分析中,S.T.O.N.E.评分(P = 0.002)和结石大小(P = 0.037)是SFR的预测因素。此外,S.T.O.N.E.评分与手术时间、LOS及并发症的发生之间存在显著相关性(分别为P = 0.22,P = 0.006;P = 0.30,P < 0.001;P = 0.27,P < 0.001)。S.T.O.N.E.评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.815。
S.T.O.N.E.评分系统在预测术后结果方面简单有效;因此,该评分对于每一位接受rURS治疗的患者的临床规划将是一个有价值的工具。