Bhakhri Kunal, Harrison-Phipps K, Harling Leanne, Routledge T
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 10;8:595203. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.595203. eCollection 2021.
The focus of this research is to qualitatively analyse the literature and address the knowledge gap between robotic surgery simulation (RoSS) and core surgical training curriculum. It will compare the effectiveness and the benefits of using robotic simulators in training as compared to the current standard training methods. A qualitative research of literature was carried out with the use of critical analysis formatting to expand the search. The inclusion criteria entailed selecting academic resources that focused on Robotic Surgery Simulation (RoSS) and core surgical curriculum. The Online databases used in the search took into account information retrieval from stakeholders. In this article, we compiled and scrutinized the available relevant literature comparing performance assessments, surgical skills transfer and assessment tools between robotic surgery simulation (RoSS) and current training platforms in open and minimal access surgery. Data that has been published underpins the authenticity of robotic Surgery Simulation (RoSS), based on a combination of observational evaluation and simulation scores. The introduction of robotic surgery simulation (RoSS) has the potential to bring major improvements in the surgical training curriculum. RoSS platforms are more robust in terms of ensuring rapid surgical skills transfer/ acquisition, assessment is standardized, unbiased and the training covers non-technical skills aspects.
本研究的重点是对文献进行定性分析,填补机器人手术模拟(RoSS)与核心外科培训课程之间的知识空白。与当前的标准培训方法相比,本研究将比较使用机器人模拟器进行培训的有效性和益处。采用批判性分析格式对文献进行了定性研究,以扩大搜索范围。纳入标准包括选择专注于机器人手术模拟(RoSS)和核心外科课程的学术资源。搜索中使用的在线数据库考虑了从利益相关者处检索的信息。在本文中,我们汇编并仔细审查了现有的相关文献,比较了机器人手术模拟(RoSS)与开放手术和微创手术当前培训平台之间的性能评估、手术技能转移和评估工具。已发表的数据基于观察性评估和模拟分数的结合,证实了机器人手术模拟(RoSS)的真实性。机器人手术模拟(RoSS)的引入有可能给外科培训课程带来重大改进。RoSS平台在确保快速手术技能转移/获取方面更加强大,评估是标准化、无偏见的,并且培训涵盖非技术技能方面。