• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证基于常规临床实验室数据的标记物列线图,用于预测肾移植受者 5 年移植物存活率。

Development and validation of routine clinical laboratory data derived marker-based nomograms for the prediction of 5-year graft survival in kidney transplant recipients.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine/Research Centre of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Urology/Organ Transplant Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Mar 26;13(7):9927-9947. doi: 10.18632/aging.202748.

DOI:10.18632/aging.202748
PMID:33795527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064213/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To develop and validate predictive nomograms for 5-year graft survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with easily-available laboratory data derived markers and clinical variables within the first year post-transplant.

METHODS

The clinical and routine laboratory data from within the first year post-transplant of 1289 KTRs was collected to generate candidate predictors. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and LASSO were conducted to select final predictors. X-tile analysis was applied to identify optimal cutoff values to transform potential continuous factors into category variables and stratify patients. C-index, calibration curve, dynamic time-dependent AUC, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate models' predictive accuracy and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Two predictive nomograms were constructed by using 0-6- and 0-12- month laboratory data, and showed good predictive performance with C-indexes of 0.78 and 0.85, respectively, in the training cohort. Calibration curves showed that the prediction probabilities of 5-year graft survival were in concordance with actual observations. Additionally, KTRs could be successfully stratified into three risk groups by nomograms.

CONCLUSIONS

These predictive nomograms combining demographic and 0-6- or 0-12- month markers derived from post-transplant laboratory data could serve as useful tools for early identification of 5-year graft survival probability in individual KTRs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发并验证一种预测模型,通过对移植后 1 年内可获得的实验室数据和临床变量进行分析,预测肾移植受者(KTR)5 年移植物存活率。

方法

本研究收集了 1289 例 KTR 移植后 1 年内的临床和常规实验室数据,以生成候选预测因子。采用单因素和多因素 Cox 分析以及 LASSO 筛选最终预测因子。X-tile 分析用于确定最佳截断值,将潜在的连续变量转化为分类变量,并对患者进行分层。采用 C 指数、校准曲线、时间依赖性动态 AUC、决策曲线分析和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估模型的预测准确性和临床实用性。

结果

本研究使用 0-6 个月和 0-12 个月的实验室数据构建了两个预测列线图,在训练队列中具有良好的预测性能,C 指数分别为 0.78 和 0.85。校准曲线显示,5 年移植物存活率的预测概率与实际观察结果一致。此外,列线图可成功将 KTR 分为三个风险组。

结论

这些预测列线图结合了人口统计学和移植后 0-6 个月或 0-12 个月的标记物,可通过分析移植后实验室数据,为个体 KTR 5 年移植物存活率的早期预测提供有用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/d5fa711d1180/aging-13-202748-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/fd799e8b2548/aging-13-202748-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/f6e0fc688efa/aging-13-202748-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/4209ccf7676f/aging-13-202748-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/533ee39f13f0/aging-13-202748-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/d5fa711d1180/aging-13-202748-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/fd799e8b2548/aging-13-202748-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/f6e0fc688efa/aging-13-202748-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/4209ccf7676f/aging-13-202748-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/533ee39f13f0/aging-13-202748-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d18/8064213/d5fa711d1180/aging-13-202748-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of routine clinical laboratory data derived marker-based nomograms for the prediction of 5-year graft survival in kidney transplant recipients.开发和验证基于常规临床实验室数据的标记物列线图,用于预测肾移植受者 5 年移植物存活率。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Mar 26;13(7):9927-9947. doi: 10.18632/aging.202748.
2
Prediction of graft survival of living-donor kidney transplantation: nomograms or artificial neural networks?活体供肾移植移植物存活的预测:列线图还是人工神经网络?
Transplantation. 2008 Nov 27;86(10):1401-6. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818b221f.
3
Can a Nomogram Help to Predict the Overall and Cancer-specific Survival of Patients With Chondrosarcoma?列线图能否预测软骨肉瘤患者的总生存和癌症特异性生存?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 May;476(5):987-996. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000152.
4
Nomograms for predicting graft function and survival in living donor kidney transplantation based on the UNOS Registry.基于器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记系统的活体供肾移植中预测移植肾功能和存活情况的列线图。
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.164. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
5
Prediction of kidney graft failure using clinical scoring tools.利用临床评分工具预测肾移植失败。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):517-22. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12135. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
A Machine Learning Approach Using Survival Statistics to Predict Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.一种使用生存统计的机器学习方法预测肾移植受者移植物存活率:一项多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):8904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08008-8.
7
Prognostic nomograms and Aggtrmmns scoring system for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with kidney cancer.用于预测肾癌患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的预后列线图及Aggtrmmns评分系统。 需注意,原文中的“Aggtrmmns”可能有误,不太明确其准确含义。
Cancer Med. 2020 Apr;9(8):2710-2722. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2916. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
8
Prediction of cancer-specific survival and overall survival in middle-aged and older patients with rectal adenocarcinoma using a nomogram model.使用列线图模型预测中老年直肠腺癌患者的癌症特异性生存率和总生存率。
Transl Oncol. 2021 Jan;14(1):100938. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100938. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Establishment and validation of prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival for patients with osteosarcoma.骨肉瘤患者总生存和癌症特异性生存预测预后列线图的建立与验证
Neoplasma. 2021 Mar;68(2):434-446. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_200617N639. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
10
Nomograms to predict survival after colorectal cancer resection without preoperative therapy.预测未经术前治疗的结直肠癌切除术后生存率的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2684-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel method to predict white blood cells after kidney transplantation based on machine learning.一种基于机器学习预测肾移植后白细胞的新方法。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 21;10:20552076241288107. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288107. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive review of the impact of tacrolimus intrapatient variability on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation.他克莫司患者内变异对肾移植临床结局影响的综合评价
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):1969-1983. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16002. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation.肾移植的最新进展与临床结果
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):1193. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041193.
3
Increasing Time in Therapeutic Range of Tacrolimus in the First Year Predicts Better Outcomes in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation.
在第一年增加他克莫司的治疗窗时间可预测活体供肾移植的更好结局。
Front Immunol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2912. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02912. eCollection 2019.
4
Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study.移植肾受者移植肾丢失风险预测系统:国际推导和验证研究。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 17;366:l4923. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4923.
5
Machine learning in predicting graft failure following kidney transplantation: A systematic review of published predictive models.机器学习在预测肾移植后移植物失败中的应用:已发表预测模型的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103957. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103957. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
6
Intrapatient Variability of Tacrolimus Exposure in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Novel Marker for Clinical Outcome.实体器官移植中环孢素暴露的患者内变异性:临床转归的新标志物。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):347-358. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1618. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Assessment of serum Tim-3 and Gal-9 levels in predicting the risk of infection after kidney transplantation.评估血清 Tim-3 和 Gal-9 水平预测肾移植后感染风险。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Oct;75:105803. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105803. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts acute allograft rejection in kidney transplantation; a retrospective study.高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测肾移植中的急性移植物排斥反应:一项回顾性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Apr 18;49(2):525-530. doi: 10.3906/sag-1811-41.
9
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.报告和解读决策曲线分析:研究人员指南。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
Development and future deployment of a 5 years allograft survival model for kidney transplantation.开发和未来部署一个 5 年的同种异体移植物肾移植存活模型。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Aug;24(8):855-862. doi: 10.1111/nep.13488. Epub 2019 Apr 30.