Departamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Departamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Brazil.
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;9:623521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.623521. eCollection 2021.
Over the last months, mathematical models have been extensively used to help control the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Although extremely useful in many tasks, most models have performed poorly in forecasting the pandemic peaks. We investigate this common pitfall by forecasting four countries' pandemic peak: Austria, Germany, Italy, and South Korea. Far from the peaks, our models can forecast the pandemic dynamics 20 days ahead. Nevertheless, when calibrating our models close to the day of the pandemic peak, all forecasts fail. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis revealed the main obstacle: the misestimation of the transmission rate. Inverse uncertainty quantification has shown that significant changes in transmission rate commonly precede a peak. These changes are a key factor in forecasting the pandemic peak. Long forecasts of the pandemic peak are therefore undermined by the lack of models that can forecast changes in the transmission rate, i.e., how a particular society behaves, changes of mitigation policies, or how society chooses to respond to them. In addition, our studies revealed that even short forecasts of the pandemic peak are challenging. Backward projections have shown us that the correct estimation of any temporal change in the transmission rate is only possible many days ahead. Our results suggest that the distance between a change in the transmission rate and its correct identification in the curve of active infected cases can be as long as 15 days. This is intrinsic to the phenomenon and how it affects epidemic data: a new case is usually only reported after an incubation period followed by a delay associated with the test. In summary, our results suggest the phenomenon itself challenges the task of forecasting the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic when only epidemic data is available. Nevertheless, we show that exciting results can be obtained when using the same models to project different scenarios of reduced transmission rates. Therefore, our results highlight that mathematical modeling can help control COVID-19 pandemic by backward projections that characterize the phenomena' essential features and forward projections when different scenarios and strategies can be tested and used for decision-making.
在过去的几个月里,数学模型被广泛用于帮助控制全球的 COVID-19 大流行。虽然在许多任务中非常有用,但大多数模型在预测疫情高峰期方面表现不佳。我们通过预测奥地利、德国、意大利和韩国这四个国家的疫情高峰期来研究这个常见的陷阱。在远离高峰期的情况下,我们的模型可以提前 20 天预测疫情动态。然而,当我们在接近疫情高峰期的那天校准模型时,所有的预测都失败了。不确定性量化和敏感性分析揭示了主要障碍:传播率的错误估计。反不确定性量化表明,在高峰期之前,传播率通常会发生显著变化。这些变化是预测疫情高峰期的关键因素。由于缺乏能够预测传播率变化的模型,即特定社会的行为方式、缓解政策的变化或社会如何选择应对这些变化的模型,因此对疫情高峰期的长期预测受到了阻碍。此外,我们的研究还表明,即使是对疫情高峰期的短期预测也具有挑战性。回溯预测使我们认识到,只有在许多天前,才能正确估计传播率的任何时间变化。我们的结果表明,在传播率变化及其在活跃感染病例曲线上的正确识别之间的距离可能长达 15 天。这是由于现象本身及其对传染病数据的影响:新病例通常只有在潜伏期后,并且在与检测相关的延迟后才会被报告。总之,我们的研究结果表明,当仅使用传染病数据进行预测时,现象本身就对预测 COVID-19 大流行高峰期的任务构成了挑战。然而,我们表明,当使用相同的模型来预测不同的低传播率情景时,可以获得令人兴奋的结果。因此,我们的结果强调了数学建模可以通过回溯预测来帮助控制 COVID-19 大流行,这些预测可以描述现象的基本特征,以及通过不同情景和策略的前向预测来帮助决策。