Suppr超能文献

感知家庭管理困扰量表的心理测量效度。

Psychometric validity of the Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale.

作者信息

Sato Iori, Sakka Mariko, Muramoto Miyuki, Ikeda Mari

机构信息

Unit of Research for Family Quality of Life Reporting, Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Child and Family Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, The Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18069-9.

Abstract

Home management of the home and family, including household chores, childrearing, caregiving and shopping, can be a burden, especially when the person or a family member is ill or affected by psychological or social issues. We developed a subjective indicator of this burden, the self-report, five-item, five-point Likert scale "Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale". Here, we evaluated the psychometric validity of the scale, using an online questionnaire survey among members of the Japanese Association for Research in Family Nursing. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the unidimensional structure (CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.028, SRMR = 0.007). Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. Mean score was higher among participants with childrearing responsibilities than in those without (n = 198, mean = 10.3, SD = 5.24, vs. n = 312, mean = 6.4, SD = 4.59; p < 0.001), and among those with caregiving responsibilities than in those without (n = 81, mean = 9.6, SD = 5.11, vs. n = 829, mean = 7.6, SD = 5.21; p = 0.002). Score was independently associated with Kessler-6 score (B = 0.33, β = 0.331, p < 0.001) and mediated the negative effects of childrearing/caregiving. The Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale demonstrated sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, including known-groups and convergent validity. Test-retest reliability and generalizability to general populations awaits further research.

摘要

家庭和家庭事务的管理,包括家务、育儿、照顾他人和购物,可能会成为一种负担,尤其是当个人或家庭成员生病或受到心理或社会问题影响时。我们开发了一种衡量这种负担的主观指标,即自我报告的、包含五个条目的五点李克特量表“感知家庭管理困扰量表”。在此,我们通过对日本家庭护理研究协会成员进行在线问卷调查,评估了该量表的心理测量效度。验证性因素分析支持单维结构(CFI = 0.999,RMSEA = 0.028,SRMR = 0.007)。克朗巴哈系数和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数分别为0.92和0.93。有育儿责任的参与者的平均得分高于没有育儿责任的参与者(n = 198,平均值 = 10.3,标准差 = 5.24,对比n = 312,平均值 = 6.4,标准差 = 4.59;p < 0.001),有照顾他人责任的参与者的平均得分高于没有照顾他人责任的参与者(n = 81,平均值 = 9.6,标准差 = 5.11,对比n = 829,平均值 = 7.6,标准差 = 5.21;p = 0.002)。得分与凯斯勒6项心理困扰量表得分独立相关(B = 0.33,β = 0.331,p < 0.001),并介导了育儿/照顾他人的负面影响。感知家庭管理困扰量表表现出足够的结构效度、内部一致性和构想效度,包括已知群体效度和收敛效度。重测信度以及对一般人群的可推广性有待进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验