López-Valverde Nansi, Macedo-de-Sousa Bruno, López-Valverde Antonio, Ramírez Juan Manuel
Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Institute for Occlusion and Orofacial Pain, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Polo I-Edifício Central Rua Larga, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;10(4):360. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040360.
Titanium (Ti) dental implant failure as a result of infection has been established at 40%, being regarded as one of the most habitual and untreatable problems. Current research is focused on the design of new surfaces that can generate long-lasting, infection-free osseointegration. The purpose of our study was to assess studies on Ti implants coated with different antibacterial surfaces, assessing their osseointegration. The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were electronically searched for in vivo studies up to December 2020, selecting six studies that met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) criteria and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's (SYRCLE's) risk of bias tool. Although all the included studies, proved greater osseointegration capacity of the different antibacterial surfaces studied, the methodological quality and experimental models used in some of them make it difficult to draw predictable conclusions. Because of the foregoing, we recommend caution when interpreting the results obtained.
因感染导致的钛(Ti)牙种植体失败率已达40%,被视为最常见且难以治疗的问题之一。当前的研究集中在能够实现持久、无感染骨整合的新表面设计上。我们研究的目的是评估关于涂覆不同抗菌表面的钛种植体的研究,评估其骨整合情况。通过电子检索PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库,查找截至2020年12月的体内研究,筛选出六项符合纳入标准的研究。使用ARRIVE(动物研究:体内实验报告)标准和实验动物实验系统评价中心(SYRCLE)的偏倚风险工具对所选研究的质量进行评估。尽管所有纳入研究均证明所研究的不同抗菌表面具有更强的骨整合能力,但其中一些研究的方法学质量和所使用的实验模型使得难以得出可预测的结论。基于上述情况,我们建议在解释所得结果时要谨慎。