Pohl Julia, Mincu Raluca-Ileana, Mrotzek Simone M, Wakili Reza, Mahabadi Amir A, Potthoff Sophia K, Siveke Jens T, Keller Ulrich, Landmesser Ulf, Rassaf Tienush, Anker Markus S, Totzeck Matthias
West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Medical Faculty, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin (CBF), 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;13(6):1197. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061197.
To evaluate a new electrocardiographic (ECG) score reflecting domains of electrical and structural alterations in therapy-naïve cancer patients to assess their risk of cardiotoxicity.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 134 therapy-naïve consecutive cancer patients in our two university hospitals concerning four ECG score parameters: Contiguous Q-waves, markers of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, QRS duration and JTc prolongation. Cardiotoxicity was assessed after a short-term follow-up (up to 12 months).
Of all the patients ( = 25), 19% reached 0 points, 50% ( = 67) reached 1 point, 25% ( = 33) reached 2 points, 5% ( = 7) reached 3 points and 0.7% reached 4 or 5 points ( = 1 respectively). The incidence of cardiotoxicity ( = 28 [21%]) increased with the ECG score, with 0 points at 0%, 1 point 7.5%, 2 points 55%, 3 points 71% and ≥3 points 50%. In the ROC (Receiver operating curves) analysis, the best cut-off for predicting cardiotoxicity was an ECG score of ≥2 points (sensitivity 82%, specificity 82%, AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.92, < 0.0001) which was then defined as a high-risk score. High-risk patients did not differ concerning their age, LV ejection fraction, classical cardiovascular risk factors or cardiac biomarkers compared to those with a low-risk ECG score.
ECG scoring prior to the start of anti-cancer therapies may help to identify therapy-naïve cancer patients at a higher risk for the development of cardiotoxicity.
评估一种新的心电图(ECG)评分,该评分反映初治癌症患者的电和结构改变领域,以评估其心脏毒性风险。
我们对两所大学医院的134例连续初治癌症患者进行了回顾性分析,涉及四个心电图评分参数:连续Q波、左心室(LV)肥厚标志物、QRS时限和JTc延长。在短期随访(最长12个月)后评估心脏毒性。
在所有患者(n = 134)中,19%(n = 2)得0分,50%(n = 67)得1分,25%(n = 33)得2分,5%(n = 7)得3分,0.7%得4或5分(分别为n = 1)。心脏毒性发生率(n = 28 [21%])随心电图评分增加而升高,0分为0%,1分为7.5%,2分为55%,3分为71%,≥3分为50%。在ROC(受试者工作曲线)分析中,预测心脏毒性的最佳截断值是心电图评分≥2分(敏感性82%,特异性82%,AUC 0.84,95% CI 0.77 - 0.92,P < 0.0001),随后将其定义为高危评分。与低危心电图评分患者相比,高危患者在年龄、左心室射血分数、经典心血管危险因素或心脏生物标志物方面无差异。
在抗癌治疗开始前进行心电图评分可能有助于识别初治癌症患者发生心脏毒性的较高风险。