• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利新冠疫情首个创伤期内新闻界对死亡的否认

Journalistic Denial of Death during the Very First Traumatic Period of the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Solomon Sheldon, Rostellato Daniele, Testoni Ines, Calabrese Fiorella, Biasco Guido

机构信息

Psychology Department, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.

Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;11(3):41. doi: 10.3390/bs11030041.

DOI:10.3390/bs11030041
PMID:33806901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8004840/
Abstract

Exactly one year ago, between February and March 2020, the COVID-19 infection went from an epidemic confined to China to a worldwide pandemic that was particularly lethal in Italy. This study examined the media accounts during that period by analysing the representation of death-related constructs in Corriere della Sera, the most widely read newspaper in Italy. A textual and thematic analysis of articles published between period A (epidemic: 23 January-22 February 2020) and period B (pandemic: 23 February-31 March 2020) was conducted using Nvivo-11. A total of 141 articles comprising 48,524 words were collected. The most utilised words and meanings linked to COVID-19 were computed. In the rank distribution, 'China' and 'virus' were the terms most frequently used in both periods. The terms 'death' and 'dead' were completely absent in period A and appeared in the 535th position in period B. The term 'dead' was used primarily to indicate the number of deceased. From a Terror Management Theory perspective, it is possible that the minimal reference to death-related issues was a reflection of death denial and a manifestation of efforts to deny death to manage terror. These findings highlight the ambiguities and ambivalence surrounding any issue pertaining to death; on the one side, undue alarmism may provoke exaggerated reactions, such as moral panic, while on the other denial-based messages that minimise references to mortality may reduce safe behaviour during a pandemic.

摘要

整整一年前,即2020年2月至3月期间,新冠病毒感染从局限于中国的疫情演变成一场全球大流行,在意大利造成了尤为严重的致死情况。本研究通过分析意大利阅读量最大的报纸《晚邮报》中与死亡相关概念的呈现方式,审视了那段时期的媒体报道。使用Nvivo - 11对在A期(疫情期:2020年1月23日至2月22日)和B期(大流行期:2020年2月23日至3月31日)发表的文章进行了文本和主题分析。共收集了141篇文章,总计48524个单词。计算了与新冠病毒相关的最常用词汇和含义。在排名分布中,“中国”和“病毒”是两个时期最常使用的词汇。“死亡”和“死者”这两个词在A期完全没有出现,在B期出现在第535位。“死者”一词主要用于表示死亡人数。从恐惧管理理论的角度来看,对与死亡相关问题的极少提及可能反映了对死亡的否认,以及为应对恐惧而否认死亡的努力表现。这些发现凸显了围绕任何与死亡相关问题的模糊性和矛盾性;一方面,过度的危言耸听可能引发夸大的反应,如道德恐慌,而另一方面,尽量减少对死亡率提及的基于否认的信息可能会降低大流行期间的安全行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e0b/8004840/cb9ee94b07c8/behavsci-11-00041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e0b/8004840/cb9ee94b07c8/behavsci-11-00041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e0b/8004840/cb9ee94b07c8/behavsci-11-00041-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Journalistic Denial of Death during the Very First Traumatic Period of the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.意大利新冠疫情首个创伤期内新闻界对死亡的否认
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;11(3):41. doi: 10.3390/bs11030041.
2
How the Media Places Responsibility for the COVID-19 Pandemic-An Australian Media Analysis.媒体如何界定新冠疫情的责任——一项澳大利亚媒体分析
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;8:483. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00483. eCollection 2020.
3
Immunization and media coverage in Italy: an eleven-year analysis (2007-17).意大利的免疫接种和媒体报道:十一年分析(2007-2017 年)。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(10):2533-2536. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1486156. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Information on the COVID-19 Pandemic in Daily Newspapers' Front Pages: Case Study of Spain and Italy.关于每日报纸头版的 COVID-19 大流行信息:以西班牙和意大利为例的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176330.
5
Understanding terror states of online users in the context of COVID-19: An application of Terror Management Theory.在新冠疫情背景下理解网络用户的恐惧状态:恐怖管理理论的应用
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Dec;125:106967. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106967. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
6
Overview of dreadful consequences of SARS-CoV-2 invasion in Italy from March 2020 to March 2022.2020年3月至2022年3月期间,意大利新冠病毒入侵的可怕后果概述。
Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022;46(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00867-0. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Quality of reporting on the vegetative state in Italian newspapers. The case of Eluana Englaro.意大利报纸对植物人状态报道质量的调查。埃卢安娜·恩格勒罗案例。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 12;6(4):e18706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018706.
8
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
9
Covid-19 Outbreak Progression in Italian Regions: Approaching the Peak by the End of March in Northern Italy and First Week of April in Southern Italy.意大利各地区的新冠疫情进展:北部地区将于 3 月底达到高峰,南部地区将于 4 月初达到高峰。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093025.
10
Concerns over COVID-19 and prejudice: Pre- and during-pandemic in Italy.对 COVID-19 和偏见的担忧:意大利大流行前和大流行期间的情况。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1378-1391. doi: 10.1177/00332941211064814. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Characteristics and Evolution Analysis of Information Dissemination Theme of Social Networks under Emergencies.突发事件下社交网络信息传播主题的动态特征与演化分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;13(4):282. doi: 10.3390/bs13040282.
2
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Food Security and Caused Psychosocial Stress in Selected States of Nigeria.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对尼日利亚部分州的粮食安全造成影响并引发心理社会压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054016.
3
COVID-19 mortality in Brazil, 2020-21: consequences of the pandemic inadequate management.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid Media Misguidance: A Case Report Highlighting the Influence of Media on Patient Medication Decision Making.新冠疫情相关的媒体误导:一则病例报告凸显媒体对患者用药决策的影响
Innov Pharm. 2021 Jan 8;12(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3555. eCollection 2021.
2
How newspaper images position different groups of people in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic: A social representations approach.报纸图像如何将不同人群与新冠疫情相关联进行定位:一种社会表征方法。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul-Aug;31(4):465-494. doi: 10.1002/casp.2515. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Lifting lockdown policies: A critical moment for COVID-19 stigma.
2020 - 2021年巴西的新冠病毒疾病死亡率:疫情管理不善的后果
Arch Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;80(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-01012-z.
4
New Psychological Perspectives on Death and Dying-Between Normality and the COVID-19 Emergency.关于死亡与临终的新心理学视角——在常态与新冠疫情紧急情况之间
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;12(11):414. doi: 10.3390/bs12110414.
5
'You're Not Alone for China': The First Song in Times of COVID-19 to Keep the Faith in a World Crying in Silence.《“你在中国并不孤单”:新冠疫情期间第一首让人在无声哭泣的世界中坚守信念的歌曲》
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;12(4):88. doi: 10.3390/bs12040088.
解除封锁政策:应对新冠病毒污名化的关键时刻。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Dec;15(12):1917-1923. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1825771. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
4
Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition.有效管理 COVID-19 过渡期的十个注意事项。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):677-687. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Exposure to coronavirus news on mainstream media: The role of risk perceptions and depression.主流媒体上接触冠状病毒新闻:风险认知和抑郁的作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):865-874. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12427. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
Lessons learned from HIV can inform our approach to COVID-19 stigma.从艾滋病毒中吸取的经验教训可为我们应对新冠病毒污名化问题提供借鉴。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 May;23(5):e25504. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25504.
7
Creating COVID-19 Stigma by Referencing the Novel Coronavirus as the "Chinese virus" on Twitter: Quantitative Analysis of Social Media Data.在推特上将新型冠状病毒称为“中国病毒”从而制造新冠病毒污名化:社交媒体数据的定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19301. doi: 10.2196/19301.
8
The impact of social media on risk perceptions during the MERS outbreak in South Korea.社交媒体对韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间风险认知的影响。
Comput Human Behav. 2017 Jul;72:422-431. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
How Do We Balance Tensions Between COVID-19 Public Health Responses and Stigma Mitigation? Learning from HIV Research.我们如何平衡新冠疫情公共卫生应对措施与消除污名化之间的矛盾?从艾滋病研究中汲取经验。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jul;24(7):2003-2006. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02856-8.
10
Stop the coronavirus stigma now.现在停止对新冠病毒的污名化。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7802):165. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01009-0.