• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了生产——以及动物和我。丹麦农业院校的学生如何看待动物福利。

For the Sake of Production-And the Animal, and Me. How Students at Danish Agricultural Colleges Perceive Animal Welfare.

作者信息

Anneberg Inger, Lassen Jesper, Sandøe Peter

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):696. doi: 10.3390/ani11030696.

DOI:10.3390/ani11030696
PMID:33807571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8001740/
Abstract

Farmers' perceptions of animal welfare have been found to affect the way they treat their animals, and there is growing awareness of the range of ethical views today's farmers take on animal welfare. The purpose of this study was to examine how perceptions of animal welfare develop among prospective farmers and farm workers in Denmark during their studies at agricultural colleges. We also examined the experiences of college teachers and their views on the inclusion of animal welfare in livestock courses. Drawing on individual interviews and focus group interviews at four Danish agricultural colleges, we used systematic text condensation to identify three major themes among the students: 1. The importance of balancing welfare and productivity, 2. Concerns about the animal itself, 3. Concerns relating to the students themselves. Our interviews with teachers revealed a growing awareness of the inclusion of animal welfare in Danish agricultural colleges, but also disagreements over the way animal welfare should be understood. We conclude that the education of future farmers in Danish agricultural colleges today embraces animal welfare but should leave more room in the future to introduce students to the issue of market-driven welfare and consumer interest in animal-friendly production.

摘要

研究发现,农民对动物福利的认知会影响他们对待动物的方式,而且如今农民对动物福利所持的一系列伦理观点也日益受到关注。本研究的目的是考察丹麦未来的农民和农场工人在农业院校学习期间,其对动物福利的认知是如何形成的。我们还研究了大学教师的经历以及他们对在畜牧课程中纳入动物福利的看法。通过对丹麦四所农业院校进行的个人访谈和焦点小组访谈,我们运用系统的文本浓缩法,在学生中确定了三个主要主题:1. 平衡福利与生产力的重要性;2. 对动物本身的关注;3. 与学生自身相关的关注。我们与教师的访谈表明,丹麦农业院校对纳入动物福利的认识在不断提高,但在动物福利应如何理解的问题上也存在分歧。我们得出结论,如今丹麦农业院校对未来农民的教育涵盖了动物福利,但未来应留出更多空间,向学生介绍市场驱动的福利以及消费者对动物友好型生产的兴趣问题。

相似文献

1
For the Sake of Production-And the Animal, and Me. How Students at Danish Agricultural Colleges Perceive Animal Welfare.为了生产——以及动物和我。丹麦农业院校的学生如何看待动物福利。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):696. doi: 10.3390/ani11030696.
2
Invited review: Examining farmers' personalities and attitudes as possible risk factors for dairy cattle health, welfare, productivity, and farm management: A systematic scoping review.邀请评论:研究农民的个性和态度作为奶牛健康、福利、生产力和农场管理的潜在风险因素:系统范围审查。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):3805-3824. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15037. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Views of dairy farmers, agricultural advisors, and lay citizens on the ideal dairy farm.奶农、农业顾问和普通市民对理想奶牛场的看法。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1811-1821. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14688. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Dairy farmers' expectations and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: A focus group study.奶农对动物福利建议的期望和接受程度:一项焦点小组研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7385-7397. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15821. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
'Would it sell more pork?' Pig farmers' perceptions of Real Welfare, the welfare outcome component of their farm assurance scheme.“这会增加猪肉销量吗?”——生猪养殖户对其农场保障计划中福利结果部分“真正福利”的看法。
Animal. 2019 Dec;13(12):2864-2875. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000946. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Factors that Influence Farmers' Views on Farm Animal Welfare: A Semi-Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.影响农民对农场动物福利看法的因素:一项半系统综述与主题分析
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 28;10(9):1524. doi: 10.3390/ani10091524.
7
My pigs are ok, why change? - animal welfare accounts of pig farmers.我的猪很好,为什么要改变?-养猪户的动物福利账目。
Animal. 2021 Mar;15(3):100154. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100154. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
Farmers' Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany.农民对动物福利计划设计的偏好:来自德国一项基于选择的联合分析研究的见解
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):704. doi: 10.3390/ani11030704.
9
What Are the Positives? Exploring Positive Welfare Indicators in a Qualitative Interview Study with Livestock Farmers.积极方面有哪些?在一项对畜牧养殖户的定性访谈研究中探索积极的福利指标。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 17;9(9):694. doi: 10.3390/ani9090694.
10
Human-animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming.人畜关系影响养猪业的饲养实践、动物福利和生产力。
Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental Enrichment for Rats and Mice Housed in Laboratories: A Metareview.实验室饲养大鼠和小鼠的环境丰富化:一项元综述。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;12(4):414. doi: 10.3390/ani12040414.

本文引用的文献

1
Veterinary Student Knowledge and Attitudes about Swine Change after Lectures and a Farm Visit.兽医学生在讲座和农场参观后的猪病知识和态度变化。
J Vet Med Educ. 2021 Aug;48(4):492-502. doi: 10.3138/jvme-2019-0160. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
Benchmarking Farm Animal Welfare-A Novel Tool for Cross-Country Comparison Applied to Pig Production and Pork Consumption.衡量农场动物福利——一种用于跨国比较的新工具,应用于生猪生产和猪肉消费
Animals (Basel). 2020 May 31;10(6):955. doi: 10.3390/ani10060955.
3
In Search of the Urban Cowboy: The Need to Incorporate Animal Husbandry into the United States Higher Education Curriculum and Its Implications for Production Animal Welfare.寻找都市牛仔:将畜牧业纳入美国高等教育课程的必要性及其对生产动物福利的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Sep 21;3:84. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00084. eCollection 2016.
4
Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes.为什么大多数欧盟国家的猪都要断尾?根据欧盟立法和动物福利结果,对四种猪舍和管理方案的经济和伦理分析。
Animal. 2016 Apr;10(4):687-99. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002098. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis.系统文本浓缩:一种定性分析策略。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030.
6
A comparison of veterinary students enrolled and not enrolled in an animal-welfare course.对选修和未选修动物福利课程的兽医专业学生的比较。
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Spring;37(1):40-8. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.40.
7
The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: history and prospects.欧盟对蛋鸡传统鸡笼的禁令:历史与前景
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2003;6(2):103-21. doi: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0602_03.
8
Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows.商业奶牛对人类的行为反应及其生产效率。
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Mar 1;66(4):273-288. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00097-0.