University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Forensic Assessment, Training, & Research (FAsTR), Madison, WI, USA.
Sex Abuse. 2022 Mar;34(2):227-254. doi: 10.1177/10790632211002858. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
The present study is part of a larger project aiming to more closely integrate theory with empirical research into dynamic risk. It seeks to generate empirical findings with the dynamic risk factors contained in the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version (VRS-SO) that might constrain and guide the further development of Thornton's theoretical model of dynamic risk. Two key issues for theory development are (a) whether the structure of pretreatment dynamic risk factors is the same as the structure of the change in the dynamic risk factors that occurs during treatment, and (b) whether theoretical analysis should focus on individual dynamic items or on the broader factors that run through them. Factor analyses and item-level prediction analyses were conducted on VRS-SO pretreatment, posttreatment, and change ratings obtained from a large combined sample of men (s = 1,289-1,431) convicted and treated for sexual offenses. Results indicated that the latent structure of pretreatment dynamic risk was best described by a three-factor model while the latent structure of change items was two dimensional. Prediction analyses examined the degree to which items were predictive beyond prediction obtained from the broader factor that they loaded on. Results showed that for some items, their prediction appeared to be largely carried by the three broad factors. In contrast, other items seem to operate as funnels through which the broader factors' predictiveness flowed. Implications for theory development implied by these results are identified.
本研究是一个更大项目的一部分,旨在更紧密地将理论与实证研究结合起来,研究动态风险。它旨在利用动态风险因素量表-性犯罪版(VRS-SO)中包含的动态风险因素获得实证发现,这些发现可能会限制和指导桑顿动态风险理论模型的进一步发展。理论发展的两个关键问题是:(a)治疗前的动态风险因素的结构是否与治疗期间动态风险因素的变化结构相同;(b)理论分析是否应侧重于单个动态项目,还是应侧重于贯穿这些项目的更广泛因素。对来自男性(s=1,289-1,431)的大混合样本的 VRS-SO 治疗前、治疗后和变化评分进行了因素分析和项目水平预测分析,这些男性被判犯有性犯罪并接受治疗。结果表明,治疗前动态风险的潜在结构最好用三因素模型来描述,而变化项目的潜在结构是二维的。预测分析检验了项目在其加载的更广泛因素之外的预测程度。结果表明,对于某些项目,它们的预测似乎主要由三个广泛的因素来决定。相比之下,其他项目似乎充当了更广泛因素的预测性的漏斗。这些结果所暗示的理论发展的影响因素被确定。