Yin Shi, Zhang Nan
College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000 China.
School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001 China.
Nonlinear Dyn. 2021;104(3):2865-2900. doi: 10.1007/s11071-021-06385-4. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
To enhance the effectiveness of epidemic prevention (EP) in urban sustainability transformation, joint prevention and control mechanism should be established to prevent and control the COVID-19 epidemic. The interurban multi-agent EP strategy, as a key component of this mechanism, includes the spontaneous EP model, the superior leading EP model, and the collaborative EP model. In this study, firstly, the theoretical mechanism of the interurban multi-agent EP strategy was analyzed. Then, we proposed a three-party differential game model including factors such as the risk coefficient for the virus infection and EP experience teaching. Finally, prevention strategies, prevention efficiency, and prevention losses were compared under the three models based on theoretical analysis and numerical analysis. The results of this study are as follows. COVID-19 EP should be guided by a model of central government (CG) leadership, interurban collaboration, and social participation. The CG and urban governments (UGs) should comprehensively carry out COVID-19 EP from various aspects, including EP experience teaching, mass EP comfort, the utilization rate of EP funds, and the ability to implement strategies. During the course of the COVID-19 EP, when the CG and UGs transition from spontaneous EP model to a higher-level EP model, the UG's EP efforts will be enhanced. Under the collaborative EP model, the CG and UGs undergo the highest levels of EP effort. Compared with spontaneous EP model, the superior leading EP model can promote a Pareto improvement for all parties. From the perspective of total loss, the collaborative EP model is superior to the other two EP models. This study not only provides practical guidance for coordinating interurban relationships and enabling multi-agents to fully form joint forces, but also provides theoretical support for the establishment of an interurban joint EP mechanism under unified leadership.
为提高城市可持续发展转型中疫情防控的有效性,应建立联合防控机制以防控新冠疫情。城市间多主体疫情防控策略作为该机制的关键组成部分,包括自发防控模式、上级主导防控模式和协同防控模式。在本研究中,首先分析了城市间多主体疫情防控策略的理论机制。然后,我们提出了一个三方微分博弈模型,其中包括病毒感染风险系数和疫情防控经验教学等因素。最后,基于理论分析和数值分析,比较了三种模式下的防控策略、防控效率和防控损失。本研究结果如下。新冠疫情防控应以中央政府领导、城市间协作和社会参与的模式为指导。中央政府和城市政府应从疫情防控经验教学、民众疫情防控舒适度、疫情防控资金利用率和策略实施能力等多个方面全面开展新冠疫情防控工作。在新冠疫情防控过程中,当中央政府和城市政府从自发防控模式转变为更高层次的防控模式时,城市政府的防控力度将得到增强。在协同防控模式下,中央政府和城市政府的防控力度达到最高水平。与自发防控模式相比,上级主导防控模式可以促进各方的帕累托改进。从总损失的角度来看,协同防控模式优于其他两种防控模式。本研究不仅为协调城市间关系、使多主体充分形成合力提供了实践指导,也为在统一领导下建立城市间联合疫情防控机制提供了理论支持。