• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于Ia/Ib期试验的无曲线贝叶斯决策理论设计,同时考虑安全性和有效性结果。

A curve free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for phase Ia/Ib trials considering both safety and efficacy outcomes.

作者信息

Fan Shenghua, Lee Bee Leng, Lu Ying

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, 94542, CA, USA.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Jose State University, San Jose, 95192, CA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Biosci. 2020 Jul;12(2):146-166. doi: 10.1007/s12561-020-09272-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1007/s12561-020-09272-5
PMID:33815623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014959/
Abstract

A curve-free, Bayesian decision-theoretic two-stage design is proposed to select biological efficacious doses (BEDs) for phase Ia/Ib trials in which both toxicity and efficacy signals are observed. No parametric models are assumed to govern the dose-toxicity, dose-efficacy, and toxicity-efficacy relationships. We assume that the dose-toxicity curve is monotonic non-decreasing and the dose-efficacy curve is unimodal. In the phase Ia stage, a Bayesian model on the toxicity rates is used to locate the maximum tolerated dose. In the phase Ib stage, we model the dose-efficacy curve using a step function while continuing to monitor the toxicity rates. Furthermore, a measure of the goodness of fit of a candidate step function is proposed, and the interval of BEDs associated with the best fitting step function is recommended. At the end of phase Ib, if some doses are recommended as BEDs, a cohort of confirmation is recruited and assigned at these doses to improve the precision of estimates at these doses. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed design has desirable operating characteristics across different shapes of the underlying true toxicity and efficacy curves.

摘要

本文提出了一种无曲线的贝叶斯决策理论两阶段设计方法,用于在同时观察到毒性和疗效信号的Ia/Ib期试验中选择生物有效剂量(BED)。我们不假设参数模型来描述剂量-毒性、剂量-疗效和毒性-疗效关系。我们假设剂量-毒性曲线是单调非递减的,剂量-疗效曲线是单峰的。在Ia期,使用关于毒性率的贝叶斯模型来确定最大耐受剂量。在Ib期,我们使用阶跃函数对剂量-疗效曲线进行建模,同时继续监测毒性率。此外,还提出了一种衡量候选阶跃函数拟合优度的方法,并推荐了与最佳拟合阶跃函数相关的BED区间。在Ib期结束时,如果某些剂量被推荐为BED,则招募一组确认队列并将其分配到这些剂量,以提高这些剂量估计的精度。大量的模拟研究表明,所提出的设计在不同形状的潜在真实毒性和疗效曲线上具有理想的操作特性。

相似文献

1
A curve free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for phase Ia/Ib trials considering both safety and efficacy outcomes.一种用于Ia/Ib期试验的无曲线贝叶斯决策理论设计,同时考虑安全性和有效性结果。
Stat Biosci. 2020 Jul;12(2):146-166. doi: 10.1007/s12561-020-09272-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.一种用于确定I/II期临床试验最佳生物学剂量的稳健两阶段设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):27-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.7082. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.一种用于I/II期临床试验的稳健贝叶斯剂量探索设计。
Biostatistics. 2016 Apr;17(2):249-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv040. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.一种适应性多阶段I期剂量探索设计,纳入了来自多个治疗周期的连续疗效和毒性数据。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):271-286. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Design considerations and analysis planning of a phase 2a proof of concept study in rheumatoid arthritis in the presence of possible non-monotonicity.在存在可能的非单调性的情况下,类风湿关节炎 2a 期概念验证研究的设计考虑因素和分析计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0416-3.
6
Bayesian optimization for estimating the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I clinical trials.用于估计I期临床试验中最大耐受剂量的贝叶斯优化方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Feb 15;21:100753. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100753. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.斯坦因:用于无缝I/II期临床试验的简单毒性和疗效区间设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4106-4120. doi: 10.1002/sim.7428. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
A simple Bayesian decision-theoretic design for dose-finding trials.一种简单的贝叶斯决策理论设计用于剂量发现试验。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 10;31(28):3719-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.5438. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
9
Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.在I/II期临床试验中使用毒性和疗效优势比的贝叶斯剂量探索。
Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):777-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x.
10
Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.多种I期肿瘤学设计的统计操作特征的系统比较。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Nov 24;5:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.006. eCollection 2017 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced safety and efficacy of protease-regulated CAR-T cell receptors.增强了受蛋白酶调控的嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞受体的安全性和有效性。
Cell. 2022 May 12;185(10):1745-1763.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.041. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.设计剂量探索性 I 期临床试验:与统计学家讨论的十大问题。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;5:317-324. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00379. eCollection 2021 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial.在配对试验中实施EffTox剂量探索设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 20;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0381-x.
2
Determinants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.分子靶向药物推荐的2期剂量的决定因素。
Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;123(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30579. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.一种用于确定I/II期临床试验最佳生物学剂量的稳健两阶段设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):27-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.7082. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
A curve-free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for two-agent Phase I trials.用于双代理一期试验的无曲线贝叶斯决策理论设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(1):34-43. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2016.1148713. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Optimal Dosing for Targeted Therapies in Oncology: Drug Development Cases Leading by Example.肿瘤靶向治疗的最佳剂量:以药物研发案例为例。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 15;22(6):1318-24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1295. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety.开展早期临床试验以确定最佳剂量和安全性。
Mol Oncol. 2015 May;9(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
7
A new approach to designing phase I-II cancer trials for cytotoxic chemotherapies.一种针对细胞毒性化疗设计I-II期癌症试验的新方法。
Stat Med. 2014 Jul 20;33(16):2718-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.6124. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
8
A simple Bayesian decision-theoretic design for dose-finding trials.一种简单的贝叶斯决策理论设计用于剂量发现试验。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 10;31(28):3719-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.5438. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
9
Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.复杂早期临床试验的贝叶斯模型与决策算法
Stat Sci. 2010 May;25(2):227-244. doi: 10.1214/09-STS315.
10
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.I期癌症临床试验中的剂量递增方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.