• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can a pandemic make people more socially conservative? Political ideology, gender roles, and the case of COVID-19.一场大流行会让人们在社会观念上变得更加保守吗?政治意识形态、性别角色与新冠疫情案例
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;51(4):425-433. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12745. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
The Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic Made People Feel Threatened, but Had a Limited Impact on Political Attitudes in the United States.新冠疫情的爆发让人们感到受到威胁,但对美国的政治态度影响有限。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Feb;51(2):284-300. doi: 10.1177/01461672231190233. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
Typologies of people's preexisting political ideology and values would determine their post-pandemic mental health and political behaviors: Evidence from China.人们先前存在的政治意识形态和价值观类型将决定他们在疫情后的心理健康和政治行为:来自中国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1041358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041358. eCollection 2022.
4
Were Americans' Political Attitudes Linked to Objective Threats From COVID-19? An Examination of Data From Project Implicit During Initial Months of the Pandemic.美国人的政治态度与新冠疫情带来的客观威胁有关吗?对疫情最初几个月内“内隐项目”(Project Implicit)数据的考察
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Dec;48(12):1682-1700. doi: 10.1177/01461672211052121. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
5
An Exploration of the Differential Effects of Parents' Authoritarianism Dimensions on Pre-school Children's Epistemic, Existential, and Relational Needs.父母专制主义维度对学前儿童认知、存在和关系需求的差异影响探究
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02079. eCollection 2016.
6
Young people's media use and adherence to preventive measures in the "infodemic": Is it masked by political ideology?年轻人在“信息疫情”中的媒体使用情况及对预防措施的遵守:它是否被政治意识形态所掩盖?
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115596. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115596. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Relationship of political ideology of US federal and state elected officials and key COVID pandemic outcomes following vaccine rollout to adults: April 2021-March 2022.2021年4月至2022年3月美国联邦和州当选官员的政治意识形态与疫苗推出后成年人关键新冠疫情结果的关系
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Dec;16:100384. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100384. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
8
The behavioral immune system and conservatism as predictors of disease-avoidant attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic.行为免疫系统与保守主义作为新冠疫情期间疾病规避态度的预测因素
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110857. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110857. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Exposure and Aversion to Human Transmissible Diseases Predict Conservative Ideological and Partisan Preferences.对人类可传播疾病的接触与厌恶预示着保守的意识形态和党派偏好。
Polit Psychol. 2022 Feb;43(1):65-88. doi: 10.1111/pops.12741. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
10
Individual Differences in Political Ideology and Disgust Sensitivity Affect Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension.政治意识形态和厌恶敏感性的个体差异影响实时口语理解。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 11;12:699071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699071. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The Gendered Toy Choice (GTC): validating a behavioral measure of gendered parenting.性别化玩具选择(GTC):验证一种关于性别化养育方式的行为测量方法。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 29;16:1601339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601339. eCollection 2025.
2
Social influence during public crises: Weekly dynamics and adaptive patterns of conformity to the collective following the COVID-19 outbreak.公共危机期间的社会影响:COVID-19 疫情爆发后民众每周的动态变化及对集体的适应性从众模式
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2500008122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500008122. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Public Attitudes to Immigration in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Little Change in Policy Preferences, Big Drops in Issue Salience.新冠疫情后公众对移民的态度:政策偏好变化不大,问题显著性大幅下降。
Int Migr Rev. 2023 Jun;57(2):557-577. doi: 10.1177/01979183221134272. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Taking Stock and Looking Forward to the Future of Pathogen Politics in Light of New Insights and Recommendations: COVID-19 Threat Was Meaningfully Associated With Support for Liberal Policies in the United States.鉴于新的见解和建议,审视并展望病原体政治的未来:新冠疫情威胁与美国对自由主义政策的支持存在显著关联。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Oct;51(10):2031-2049. doi: 10.1177/01461672241240903. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.数字接触并不能促进幸福感,但面对面接触却能:一项在新冠疫情期间进行的跨国调查。
New Media Soc. 2024 Jan;26(1):426-449. doi: 10.1177/14614448211062164. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
The Covid-19 pandemic as an accelerator of economic worries and labor-related mental health polarization in Germany? A longitudinal interacted mediation analysis with a difference-in-difference comparison.新冠疫情是否加速了德国的经济担忧和与劳动相关的心理健康两极分化?一项采用双重差分比较的纵向交互中介分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 18;23:101469. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101469. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Greater traditionalism predicts COVID-19 precautionary behaviors across 27 societies.传统文化主义预示着 27 个社会的 COVID-19 预防行为。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):4969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29655-0.
8
Positive and negative experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic among lonely and non-lonely populations in Germany.德国孤独和非孤独人群对 COVID-19 大流行的积极和消极体验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;10:1067038. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1067038. eCollection 2022.
9
The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on changes in perceived work pressure for Dutch mothers and fathers.新冠疫情对荷兰父母感知到的工作压力变化的影响。
Gend Work Organ. 2022 Dec 26. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12951.
10
Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward.在 COVID-19 危机期间采取激进措施、不平等加剧和大规模形成:概述及建议的前进道路。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;10:950965. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950965. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Data sharing for novel coronavirus (COVID-19).新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)的数据共享。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):150. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.251561.
2
Ebola salience, death-thought accessibility, and worldview defense: A terror management theory perspective.埃博拉病毒显著性、死亡思维可及性与世界观防御:一个恐怖管理理论视角。
Death Stud. 2017 Oct;41(9):585-591. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1322644. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
3
Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations.寄生虫压力和病原体规避与30个国家政治意识形态的不同维度相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12408-12413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607398113. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Traditional Masculinity and Femininity: Validation of a New Scale Assessing Gender Roles.传统男性气质与女性气质:一种评估性别角色的新量表的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 5;7:956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956. eCollection 2016.
5
Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?感染与选举:埃博拉疫情是否影响了 2014 年美国联邦选举(如果有影响,具体是如何影响的)?
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):595-605. doi: 10.1177/0956797616628861. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
Disgust: evolved function and structure.厌恶:进化的功能和结构。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):65-84. doi: 10.1037/a0030778. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
Why men (and women) do and don't rebel: effects of system justification on willingness to protest.为什么男人(和女人)会反抗和不会反抗:系统辩护对抗议意愿的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Feb;38(2):197-208. doi: 10.1177/0146167211422544. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
8
Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men.令人恶心的气味会降低人们对男同性恋者的喜爱。
Emotion. 2012 Feb;12(1):23-7. doi: 10.1037/a0023984. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
9
Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes.肮脏的自由派!身体清洁的提示会影响道德和政治态度。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):517-22. doi: 10.1177/0956797611402514. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
10
On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis.文化遵从差异的起源:病原体流行假说的四项检验。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;37(3):318-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167210394451.

一场大流行会让人们在社会观念上变得更加保守吗?政治意识形态、性别角色与新冠疫情案例

Can a pandemic make people more socially conservative? Political ideology, gender roles, and the case of COVID-19.

作者信息

Rosenfeld Daniel L, Tomiyama A Janet

机构信息

Department of Psychology University of California Los Angeles CA USA.

出版信息

J Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;51(4):425-433. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12745. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1111/jasp.12745
PMID:33821034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014651/
Abstract

The first months of 2020 rapidly threw people into a period of societal turmoil and pathogen threat with the COVID-19 pandemic. By promoting epistemic and existential motivational processes and activating people's behavioral immune systems, this pandemic may have changed social and political attitudes. The current research specifically asked the following question: As COVID-19 became pronounced in the United States during the pandemic's emergence, did people living there become more socially conservative? We present a repeated-measures study ( = 695) that assessed political ideology, gender role conformity, and gender stereotypes among U.S. adults before (January 25-26, 2020) versus during (March 19-April 2, 2020) the pandemic. During the pandemic, participants reported conforming more strongly to traditional gender roles and believing more strongly in traditional gender stereotypes than they did before the pandemic. Political ideology remained constant over time. These findings suggest that a pandemic may promote the preference for traditional gender roles.

摘要

2020年的头几个月,随着新冠疫情的爆发,人们迅速陷入了社会动荡和病原体威胁的时期。通过促进认知和生存动机过程以及激活人们的行为免疫系统,这场疫情可能改变了社会和政治态度。当前的研究特别提出了以下问题:在新冠疫情在美国初露端倪期间,居住在那里的人们是否变得更加社会保守?我们呈现了一项重复测量研究(n = 695),该研究评估了美国成年人在疫情之前(2020年1月25日至26日)与疫情期间(2020年3月19日至4月2日)的政治意识形态、性别角色 conformity以及性别刻板印象。在疫情期间,参与者报告称,与疫情之前相比,他们更强烈地遵循传统性别角色,并且更坚定地相信传统性别刻板印象。政治意识形态随时间保持不变。这些发现表明,一场疫情可能会促进对传统性别角色的偏好。