• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似 COVID-19 住院患者鼻咽喉拭子联合检测的诊断性能。

Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19.

机构信息

BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05976-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-05976-1
PMID:33823800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022129/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential to guide treatment and limit spread of the virus. The combined nasal and throat swab is used widely, but its diagnostic performance is uncertain.

METHODS

In a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the combined nasal and throat swab with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in consecutive patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19. Diagnostic performance of the index and serial tests was evaluated for a primary outcome of confirmed or probable COVID-19, and a secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing. The diagnosis was adjudicated by a panel, who recorded clinical, laboratory and radiological features blinded to the test results.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1368 consecutive patients (median age 68 [interquartile range, IQR 53-80] years, 47% women) who underwent a total of 3822 tests (median 2 [IQR 1-3] tests per patient). The primary outcome occurred in 36% (496/1368), of whom 65% (323/496) and 35% (173/496) had confirmed and probable COVID-19, respectively. The index test was positive in 255/496 (51%) patients with the primary outcome, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 51.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.8 to 54.1%) and 99.5% (95% CI 99.0 to 99.8%). Sensitivity increased in those undergoing 2, 3 or 4 tests to 60.1% (95% CI 56.7 to 63.4%), 68.3% (95% CI 64.0 to 72.3%) and 77.6% (95% CI 72.7 to 81.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of the index test was 78.9% (95% CI 74.4 to 83.2%) for the secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients admitted to hospital, a single combined nasal and throat swab with RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 has excellent specificity, but limited diagnostic sensitivity for COVID-19. Diagnostic performance is significantly improved by repeated testing.

摘要

背景

准确诊断疑似 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者对于指导治疗和限制病毒传播至关重要。联合鼻咽拭子检测被广泛应用,但诊断性能不确定。

方法

在苏格兰的二级和三级保健医院进行的一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究中,我们评估了连续入院疑似 COVID-19 患者的联合鼻咽拭子与逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)的诊断性能。主要结局是确诊或可能的 COVID-19,次要结局是连续检测确诊的 COVID-19。诊断由一个小组裁定,他们记录了临床、实验室和影像学特征,而不了解测试结果。

结果

我们纳入了 1368 例连续患者(中位数年龄 68 [四分位距,IQR 53-80] 岁,47%为女性),共进行了 3822 次检测(中位数每位患者 2 [IQR 1-3] 次)。主要结局发生在 36%(496/1368)的患者中,其中 65%(323/496)和 35%(173/496)为确诊和可能的 COVID-19。在 496 例主要结局患者中,指数检测阳性 255 例,其敏感性和特异性分别为 51.4%(95%置信区间 [CI] 48.8 至 54.1%)和 99.5%(95% CI 99.0 至 99.8%)。进行 2、3 或 4 次检测的患者敏感性分别提高至 60.1%(95% CI 56.7 至 63.4%)、68.3%(95% CI 64.0 至 72.3%)和 77.6%(95% CI 72.7 至 81.9%)。在连续检测确诊 COVID-19 的次要结局中,指数检测的敏感性为 78.9%(95% CI 74.4 至 83.2%)。

结论

在住院患者中,单次联合鼻咽拭子 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 具有极好的特异性,但 COVID-19 的诊断敏感性有限。重复检测可显著提高诊断性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/090c68f1f979/12879_2021_5976_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/3cf9f80da087/12879_2021_5976_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/0c1a452beff4/12879_2021_5976_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/4360b5eecbf5/12879_2021_5976_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/090c68f1f979/12879_2021_5976_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/3cf9f80da087/12879_2021_5976_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/0c1a452beff4/12879_2021_5976_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/4360b5eecbf5/12879_2021_5976_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cabc/8022525/090c68f1f979/12879_2021_5976_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19.疑似 COVID-19 住院患者鼻咽喉拭子联合检测的诊断性能。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05976-1.
2
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
3
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.使用口腔、前鼻和鼻咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Throat Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Tonsils: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.从扁桃体采集或不采集样本的咽喉拭子对 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 12;13:e47446. doi: 10.2196/47446.
5
Dynamic profile of RT-PCR findings from 301 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study.中国武汉 301 例 COVID-19 患者的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测结果动态特征:一项描述性研究。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jun;127:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104346. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
6
COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests With Self-Collected vs Health Care Worker-Collected Nasal and Throat Swab Specimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial.COVID-19 抗原快速检测试剂:与自我采集和医护人员采集的鼻腔和咽喉拭子标本的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2344295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44295.
7
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.
8
Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling.联合咽喉/鼻腔拭子取样与鼻咽取样对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测效果相当。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;40(1):193-195. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03972-y. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同采样方法在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Comparative evaluation of swabbing sites for Omicron variant detection in PCR testing.针对奥密克戎变异株检测的 PCR 试验中拭子采样部位的比较评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jan;111(1):116577. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116577. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diagnostic Performance of Various Clinical Specimens for the Detection of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of RT-PCR Studies.用于检测新型冠状病毒肺炎的各种临床标本的诊断性能:逆转录聚合酶链反应研究的荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193057.
2
Transcriptional Profiling and Machine Learning Unveil a Concordant Biosignature of Type I Interferon-Inducible Host Response Across Nasal Swab and Pulmonary Tissue for COVID-19 Diagnosis.转录谱分析和机器学习揭示了 COVID-19 诊断中鼻腔拭子和肺组织中 I 型干扰素诱导的宿主反应的一致生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 22;12:733171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.733171. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity of RT-PCR testing of upper respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study.住院患者中SARS-CoV-2上呼吸道样本RT-PCR检测的敏感性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Feb 1;5:254. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16342.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.使用 OpenSAFELY 分析与 COVID-19 相关死亡的因素。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study.
Clinical predictors of late SARS-CoV-2 positivity in Italian internal medicine wards.
意大利内科病房中新冠病毒2型晚期阳性的临床预测因素
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Jan;52(1):e13705. doi: 10.1111/eci.13705. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
使用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议住院的 20133 例英国新冠患者的特征:前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1985.
4
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2.解读新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)诊断检测结果
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259.
5
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China, January-March 2020: retrospective cohort study.2020 年 1 月至 3 月在中国浙江省感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者的病毒载量动态和疾病严重程度:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 21;369:m1443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1443.
7
Diagnostic Performance of CT and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis.CT 与逆转录聚合酶链反应检测 2019 年冠状病毒病的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E145-E155. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201343. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study.预测 SARS-CoV-2 引起的 COVID-19 肺炎患者死亡率的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 7;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00524-2020. Print 2020 May.
9
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
Stability issues of RT-PCR testing of SARS-CoV-2 for hospitalized patients clinically diagnosed with COVID-19.SARS-CoV-2 的 RT-PCR 检测在临床上诊断为 COVID-19 的住院患者中的稳定性问题。
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):903-908. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25786. Epub 2020 Apr 5.