Lange Elke B, Pieczykolan Aleks, Trukenbrod Hans A, Huestegge Lynn
Max-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.
University of Würzburg, Germany.
J Eye Mov Res. 2018 Aug 20;11(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.11.2.9.
Eye-movement behavior is inherently rhythmic. Even without cognitive input, the eyes never rest, as saccades are generated 3 to 4 times per second. Based on an embodied view of cognition, we asked whether mental processing in visual cognitive tasks is also rhythmic in nature by studying the effects of an external auditory beat (rhythmic background music) on saccade generation in exemplary cognitive tasks (reading and sequential scanning). While in applied settings background music has been demonstrated to impair reading comprehension, the effect of musical tempo on eye-movement control during reading or scanning has not been investigated so far. We implemented a tempo manipulation in four steps as well as a silent baseline condition, while participants completed a text reading or a sequential scanning task that differed from each other in terms of underlying cognitive processing requirements. The results revealed that increased tempo of the musical beat sped up fixations in text reading, while the presence (vs. absence) of the auditory stimulus generally reduced overall reading time. In contrast, sequential scanning was unaffected by the auditory pacemaker. These results were supported by additionally applying Bayesian inference statistics. Our study provides evidence against a cognitive load account (i.e., that spare resources during low-demand sequential scanning allow for enhanced processing of the external beat). Instead, the data suggest an interpretation in favor of a modulation of the oculomotor saccade timer by irrelevant background music in cases involving highly automatized oculomotor control routines (here: in text reading).
眼球运动行为本质上是有节奏的。即使没有认知输入,眼睛也不会静止,因为每秒会产生3到4次扫视。基于认知的具身观,我们通过研究外部听觉节拍(有节奏的背景音乐)对典型认知任务(阅读和顺序扫描)中扫视产生的影响,来探讨视觉认知任务中的心理加工是否本质上也是有节奏的。虽然在应用场景中,背景音乐已被证明会损害阅读理解,但音乐节奏对阅读或扫描过程中眼球运动控制的影响迄今尚未得到研究。我们实施了一个分四步的节奏操纵以及一个安静的基线条件,同时让参与者完成一项文本阅读或一项顺序扫描任务,这两项任务在潜在的认知加工要求方面彼此不同。结果显示,音乐节拍节奏加快会加快文本阅读中的注视速度,而听觉刺激的存在(与不存在相比)总体上会减少阅读时间。相比之下,顺序扫描不受听觉起搏器的影响。这些结果得到了额外应用贝叶斯推理统计的支持。我们的研究提供了证据,反对认知负荷解释(即低需求顺序扫描期间的闲置资源允许对外部节拍进行增强加工)。相反,数据表明在涉及高度自动化眼球运动控制程序的情况下(这里指文本阅读),不相关的背景音乐对眼球运动扫视定时器有调节作用。