Suppr超能文献

40%Miswak 漱口水与 0.12%洗必泰漱口水治疗牙龈炎效果的对比评价:一项盲法、随机临床试验。

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of 40% Miswak Mouthwash and 0.12% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Treating Gingivitis: A Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Apr 9;19:229-233. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b1179501.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of a 40% miswak compared to a 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients aged 20-55 years who attended the Periodontics Clinics at the College of Dentistry, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq, were allocated into 2 groups to use either 40% miswak mouthwash or 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate Kin Gingival (Laboratorios KIN) twice daily for 2 months. Gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices were assessed.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the effectiveness of miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwashes in terms of gingivitis. The means of gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices using miswak mouthwash were 1.2, 0.4, and 0.53, respectively, i.e. indicating lower effectiveness, than when 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash was used (0.87, 0.43, 0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Miswak mouthwash is a good oral hygiene agent especially for long-term use even if its efficacy is lower than chlorhexidine mouthwash.

摘要

目的

评估 40%的斯瓦特与 0.12%洗必泰漱口水的效果。

材料和方法

共有 60 名年龄在 20-55 岁之间的患者,他们在伊拉克巴格达的伊拉克大学牙科学院牙周病诊所就诊,被分配到两组,分别使用 40%的斯瓦特漱口水或 0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定 Kin Gingival(Laboratorios KIN),每天两次,持续两个月。评估了牙龈、出血和菌斑指数。

结果

在牙龈炎方面,斯瓦特和洗必泰漱口水的效果有统计学上的显著差异。使用斯瓦特漱口水的牙龈、出血和菌斑指数的平均值分别为 1.2、0.4 和 0.53,即效果较低,而使用 0.12%洗必泰漱口水时的平均值分别为 0.87、0.43 和 0.23。

结论

斯瓦特漱口水是一种良好的口腔卫生剂,特别是对于长期使用,即使其功效低于洗必泰漱口水。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2c8/11640706/7ddb5c985781/ohpd-19-229-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验