Suppr超能文献

40%Miswak 漱口水与 0.12%洗必泰漱口水治疗牙龈炎效果的对比评价:一项盲法、随机临床试验。

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of 40% Miswak Mouthwash and 0.12% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Treating Gingivitis: A Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Apr 9;19:229-233. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b1179501.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of a 40% miswak compared to a 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients aged 20-55 years who attended the Periodontics Clinics at the College of Dentistry, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq, were allocated into 2 groups to use either 40% miswak mouthwash or 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate Kin Gingival (Laboratorios KIN) twice daily for 2 months. Gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices were assessed.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the effectiveness of miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwashes in terms of gingivitis. The means of gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices using miswak mouthwash were 1.2, 0.4, and 0.53, respectively, i.e. indicating lower effectiveness, than when 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash was used (0.87, 0.43, 0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Miswak mouthwash is a good oral hygiene agent especially for long-term use even if its efficacy is lower than chlorhexidine mouthwash.

摘要

目的

评估 40%的斯瓦特与 0.12%洗必泰漱口水的效果。

材料和方法

共有 60 名年龄在 20-55 岁之间的患者,他们在伊拉克巴格达的伊拉克大学牙科学院牙周病诊所就诊,被分配到两组,分别使用 40%的斯瓦特漱口水或 0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定 Kin Gingival(Laboratorios KIN),每天两次,持续两个月。评估了牙龈、出血和菌斑指数。

结果

在牙龈炎方面,斯瓦特和洗必泰漱口水的效果有统计学上的显著差异。使用斯瓦特漱口水的牙龈、出血和菌斑指数的平均值分别为 1.2、0.4 和 0.53,即效果较低,而使用 0.12%洗必泰漱口水时的平均值分别为 0.87、0.43 和 0.23。

结论

斯瓦特漱口水是一种良好的口腔卫生剂,特别是对于长期使用,即使其功效低于洗必泰漱口水。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2c8/11640706/7ddb5c985781/ohpd-19-229-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验