Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Apr 9;19:229-233. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b1179501.
To assess the effectiveness of a 40% miswak compared to a 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash.
A total of 60 patients aged 20-55 years who attended the Periodontics Clinics at the College of Dentistry, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq, were allocated into 2 groups to use either 40% miswak mouthwash or 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate Kin Gingival (Laboratorios KIN) twice daily for 2 months. Gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices were assessed.
There were statistically significant differences between the effectiveness of miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwashes in terms of gingivitis. The means of gingival, bleeding, and plaque indices using miswak mouthwash were 1.2, 0.4, and 0.53, respectively, i.e. indicating lower effectiveness, than when 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash was used (0.87, 0.43, 0.23, respectively).
Miswak mouthwash is a good oral hygiene agent especially for long-term use even if its efficacy is lower than chlorhexidine mouthwash.
评估 40%的斯瓦特与 0.12%洗必泰漱口水的效果。
共有 60 名年龄在 20-55 岁之间的患者,他们在伊拉克巴格达的伊拉克大学牙科学院牙周病诊所就诊,被分配到两组,分别使用 40%的斯瓦特漱口水或 0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定 Kin Gingival(Laboratorios KIN),每天两次,持续两个月。评估了牙龈、出血和菌斑指数。
在牙龈炎方面,斯瓦特和洗必泰漱口水的效果有统计学上的显著差异。使用斯瓦特漱口水的牙龈、出血和菌斑指数的平均值分别为 1.2、0.4 和 0.53,即效果较低,而使用 0.12%洗必泰漱口水时的平均值分别为 0.87、0.43 和 0.23。
斯瓦特漱口水是一种良好的口腔卫生剂,特别是对于长期使用,即使其功效低于洗必泰漱口水。