Suppr超能文献

三果汤、[此处原文缺失内容]与洗必泰漱口水对牙龈炎的比较评价:一项随机对照临床试验。

Comparative Evaluation of Triphala, , and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Penmetsa Gautami S, B Vivek, Bhupathi Arun P, Rani P Sudha, B V Subbareddy, M V Ramesh

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Nano Technology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):333-337. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_583_18.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two herbal mouthwashes in comparison with Chlorhexidine mouthwash on gingivitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, where in 60 patients were randomly allocated into three study groups: Triphala mouthwash (Group A), mouthwash (Group B), and Chlorhexidine mouthwash (Group C). All groups were treated with scaling and asked to rinse with respective mouthwashes twice daily for 1 month. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding index (BI) were recorded at baseline, 15 days, and 30 days, respectively.

RESULTS

Our results suggested that Triphala group effectively demonstrated a higher reduction in GI and BI index scores compared to group ( ≤ 0.005) and the effect is equivocal to the reduction seen with Chlorhexidine group. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the mouthwashes in reduction of PI scores ( > 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study evidenced Triphala to be superior in the reduction of plaque, gingival inflammation, and bleeding compared to that of . However, the results of our study also indicated that Triphala was as effective as chlorhexidine mouthwash in its ability in reducing plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation, and bleeding. Furthermore, Triphala is relatively free of side effects compared to that of chlorhexidine.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估两种草药漱口水与氯己定漱口水相比对牙龈炎的疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项三盲随机对照临床试验,60名患者被随机分为三个研究组:三果汤漱口水组(A组)、[此处原文缺失漱口水名称]漱口水组(B组)和氯己定漱口水组(C组)。所有组均接受龈上洁治,并要求每天用各自的漱口水漱口两次,持续1个月。分别在基线、15天和30天记录临床参数,如菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和出血指数(BI)。

结果

我们的结果表明,与[此处原文缺失漱口水名称]组相比,三果汤组在GI和BI指数评分上的降低更为显著(P≤0.005),且效果与氯己定组相当。然而,在PI评分降低方面,各漱口水之间未观察到统计学显著差异(P>0.005)。

结论

我们的研究结果证明,与[此处原文缺失漱口水名称]相比,三果汤在减少菌斑、牙龈炎症和出血方面更具优势。然而,我们的研究结果还表明,三果汤在减少菌斑积聚、牙龈炎症和出血方面与氯己定漱口水效果相当。此外,与氯己定相比,三果汤相对没有副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd83/7145231/a6babd2bf8ab/CCD-10-333-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验